On Mon, Dec 16, 2013, Jamie Strandboge wrote: > To me it makes sense to support one version *per framework* per application. > This gives power to the developer to support what he/she wants[1]. Support the > latest framework only to always stay cutting edge-- fine, but you will likely > have fewer users. Support an earlier framework to get the most users with the > least effort-- fine, but you won't be able to use newer features. Support > multiple frameworks for the best of both worlds-- fine, but you'll have more > maintenance to do.
Exactly. Also, back to the Qt example: we MUST keep support for apps built against Qt 5.0 / old ABI, probably by keeping the old libraries from a forked source package on the device or we need a mean to download this runtime for Clicks built against 13.10. For now, it's not acceptable to have Trusty images that can't run apps built against Saucy SDK. -- Loïc Minier -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
