Re: [Ubuntu-phone] OTA 9 - breaking changes

2016-01-31 Thread Zsombor Egri
QtQuick Controls wasn't in between the APIs we officially support. On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 3:43 PM, Pat McGowan wrote: > This was a result of webbrowser-app removing a direct dependency on > qml-module-qtquick-dialogs and it was not otherwise seeded. What I am > unsure of is whether the qtquickc

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] OTA 9 - breaking changes

2016-01-30 Thread Pat McGowan
This was a result of webbrowser-app removing a direct dependency on qml-module-qtquick-dialogs and it was not otherwise seeded. What I am unsure of is whether the qtquickcontrols were generally intended to be part of the supported api. Will check on it Pat On Sat, Jan 30, 2016 at 7:16 AM, Tim Sü

[Ubuntu-phone] OTA 9 - breaking changes

2016-01-30 Thread Tim Süberkrüb
Hey everyone, with OTA 9 some Qt/QtQuick packages where dropped and are not included in the image anymore. This includes: * qml-module-qtquick-dialogs:armhf * qml-module-qtquick-privatewidgets:armhf (see http://people.canonical.com/~lzemczak/landing-team/ota/ota-9.commitlog) In my case,

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] OTA-9 some new bugs

2016-01-29 Thread Bill Filler
Thanks for the feedback and please see my comments below for the bugs that my team is responsible for On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Krzysztof Tataradziński < ktatar...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > 2016-01-28 22:51 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Tataradziński : > >> Hello, >> >> I'm right after full wipe (with

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] OTA-9 some new bugs

2016-01-28 Thread lgd
Am 28.01.2016 um 22:51 schrieb Krzysztof Tataradziński: > b) Flash don't work while taking photos, even when I 'force' to use it > in options. Info: On bq E4.5 with OTA-9 it works. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone Post to : ubuntu-phone@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : h

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] OTA-9 some new bugs

2016-01-28 Thread Krzysztof Tataradziński
2016-01-28 22:51 GMT+01:00 Krzysztof Tataradziński : > Hello, > > I'm right after full wipe (with --bootstrap option), image with OTA-9, to > do some 'clean' tests and found some new bugs. > > 1. Regarding > https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1521159 > bug expanded - I

[Ubuntu-phone] OTA-9 some new bugs

2016-01-28 Thread Krzysztof Tataradziński
Hello, I'm right after full wipe (with --bootstrap option), image with OTA-9, to do some 'clean' tests and found some new bugs. 1. Regarding https://bugs.launchpad.net/canonical-devices-system-image/+bug/1521159 bug expanded - I found one person in my favorite tab in phone that was there some tim

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] OTA-9 Update not applying

2016-01-28 Thread Peter Spiers
Hello, In terms of writeable mode, I've not done anything with this device. I've not long received it from new from BQ.The device updated from OTA-4 (pre-installed) to 8.5 without any issues. I'll send over these file, you might be able to make little more sense of this than I. Many thanks 

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] OTA-9 Update not applying

2016-01-28 Thread Sergio Schvezov
El 28/01/16 a las 12:14, Peter Spiers escribió: > Hello, > > Good to see OTA-9 available, however I'm having difficulties with > applying thus update to my BQ E5 Phone. > The update is shown as available and I've downloaded it. It installed > it. The process run through to the spinning Ubuntu logo

[Ubuntu-phone] OTA-9 Update not applying

2016-01-28 Thread Peter Spiers
Hello, Good to see OTA-9 available, however I'm having difficulties with applying thus update to my BQ E5 Phone.The update is shown as available and I've downloaded it. It installed it. The process run through to the spinning Ubuntu logo and the phone restarts back to the UI. When checking the s

[Ubuntu-phone] OTA 9

2016-01-26 Thread Wayne Ward
I've been running proposed to get rockwork running but my phone just keeps crashing on phone calls and basically everything! Is ota9 nu available if I full flash the phone back in the morning to the standard version on the Bq aquaris 4.5? Its driving me mad! Wayne :) -- Sent using Dekko from

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ota 9

2016-01-22 Thread Pat McGowan
It defaults to keeping data unless you add --wipe or --bootstrap On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:23 AM, Bruce Griffis wrote: > Do you need to do the --k option to keep data? Or when you flash, does it > default to keeping your apps and data? > > On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Pat McGowan > wrote:

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ota 9

2016-01-22 Thread Pat McGowan
Also see https://developer.ubuntu.com/en/start/ubuntu-for-devices/image-channels/ On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Pat McGowan wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Wayne Ward wrote: > >> Ive im currently running proposed will i still get the OTA 9 update when >> released >> sorry for

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ota 9

2016-01-22 Thread Bruce Griffis
Do you need to do the --k option to keep data? Or when you flash, does it default to keeping your apps and data? On Fri, Jan 22, 2016 at 10:14 AM, Pat McGowan wrote: > > > On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Wayne Ward wrote: > >> Ive im currently running proposed will i still get the OTA 9 update

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] ota 9

2016-01-22 Thread Pat McGowan
On Thu, Jan 21, 2016 at 3:09 PM, Wayne Ward wrote: > Ive im currently running proposed will i still get the OTA 9 update when > released > sorry for the silly question to some! > No you wouldn't since you are not in that channel and already have later software from proposed as it has updates not

[Ubuntu-phone] ota 9

2016-01-21 Thread Wayne Ward
Ive im currently running proposed will i still get the OTA 9 update when released sorry for the silly question to some! also now im on proposed can i switch back to current after the OTA 9 i switched to proposed to get rockwork running and the fixes in OTA 9 fix all that so dont need to run prop

[Ubuntu-phone] OTA-9 milestone dates

2015-11-17 Thread Łukasz 'sil2100' Zemczak
Hello everyone, Since OTA-8 is almost out of the door, we would like to share with everyone the currently scheduled dates for OTA-9. * String/Feature Freeze - 5th of January 2016 * Final Freeze - 8th of January 2016 * Planned release date - 20th of January 2016 As you can see there's quite so