On Mar 21, 2014 4:13 AM, "Colin Watson" wrote:
>
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:45:14PM -0500, Victor Thompson wrote:
> > Colin Watson wrote:
> > > Given the choice, which is better: to have slightly more frequent
> > > breakage, but have key engineers be fresh and able to work on urgent
> > > probl
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 09:45:14PM -0500, Victor Thompson wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> > Given the choice, which is better: to have slightly more frequent
> > breakage, but have key engineers be fresh and able to work on urgent
> > problems that come their way every so often; or to have our key
>
>
>
> Given the choice, which is better: to have slightly more frequent
> breakage, but have key engineers be fresh and able to work on urgent
> problems that come their way every so often; or to have our key
> engineers concentrate hard every day to make sure as few regressions as
> possible slip
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 03:43:02PM -0300, Gustavo Boiko wrote:
> The only problem is that this doesn't scale. While one big feature lands
> (say, Qt 5.2), there are at least five or more others being developed and
> maybe even proposed. So we pick one of those to land, and then while we are
> in th
* Ricardo Salveti de Araujo wrote:
> We had lavc / ffmpeg and had to remove because of licensing
> issues. Even if we add them back, software decoding is
> currently broken, so it wouldn't help.
Bummer.
> We're only doing hardware decoding, so it might be indeed a bug
> in our gst-hybris sta
Hi
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 2:51 PM, Sebastien Bacher wrote:
> Le 20/03/2014 18:38, Bill Filler a écrit :
>
> we block changes from getting into our proposed images quite frequently
>> which seems wrong because we are so concerned about promoting it to released
>>
>
> Hey Bill,
>
> I agree with
Le 20/03/2014 18:38, Bill Filler a écrit :
we block changes from getting into our proposed images quite
frequently which seems wrong because we are so concerned about
promoting it to released
Hey Bill,
I agree with part of what you are saying. On one hand it feels like we
are sometime too ca
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 1:30 PM, Leo Arias wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Paul Larson
> wrote:
>>
>> Do we have a clearly documented "acceptance criteria" for promoting an
>> image? It seems to me that would help avoid some of the ambiguity in
>> situations like these.
>
>
> The accep
On 03/20/2014 12:30 PM, Leo Arias wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Paul Larson
> mailto:paul.lar...@canonical.com>> wrote:
>
> Do we have a clearly documented "acceptance criteria" for promoting an
> image? It seems to me that would help avoid some of the ambiguity in
> situat
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:44 AM, Ricardo Salveti de Araujo <
ricardo.salv...@canonical.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Michał Sawicz
> wrote:
> > On 20.03.2014 09:24, Selene Scriven wrote:
> >> I've also noticed that our media player doesn't seem to support
> >> very many video co
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 7:34 AM, Paul Larson wrote:
> Do we have a clearly documented "acceptance criteria" for promoting an
> image? It seems to me that would help avoid some of the ambiguity in
> situations like these.
>
The acceptance criteria it's easy. IMO, if a bug affects one of the
impor
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 5:58 AM, Michał Sawicz
wrote:
> On 20.03.2014 09:24, Selene Scriven wrote:
>> I've also noticed that our media player doesn't seem to support
>> very many video codecs. I had difficulty finding videos it can
>> actually play. This most likely isn't a regression, but it'd
Do we have a clearly documented "acceptance criteria" for promoting an
image? It seems to me that would help avoid some of the ambiguity in
situations like these.
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:26 AM, Rick Spencer
wrote:
> I agree with Jamie on this one. A music player on a phone or tablet is a
> pr
I agree with Jamie on this one. A music player on a phone or tablet is a
pretty critical app, and this bug would make it not annoying, but unusable
in most situations. I'd be surprised if we thought that the image was good
enough to promote with such a regression, especially before we understand
t
Le 20/03/2014 12:11, Dave Morley a écrit :
On 20/03/14 06:51, Didier Roche wrote:
Le 19/03/2014 23:54, Victor Thompson a écrit :
Could we hold off on promoting the image until this bug is resolved as
well: https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1292306
I believe it should be a blocker since
On 03/20/2014 06:38 AM, Jean-Baptiste Lallement wrote:
> Le 20/03/2014 12:11, Dave Morley a écrit :
>> On 20/03/14 06:51, Didier Roche wrote:
>>> Le 19/03/2014 23:54, Victor Thompson a écrit :
Could we hold off on promoting the image until this bug is resolved as
well: https://bugs.launch
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 8:11 AM, Dave Morley wrote:
> On 20/03/14 06:51, Didier Roche wrote:
>> Le 19/03/2014 23:54, Victor Thompson a écrit :
>>> Could we hold off on promoting the image until this bug is resolved as
>>> well: https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1292306
>>> I believe it sho
On 20/03/14 06:51, Didier Roche wrote:
> Le 19/03/2014 23:54, Victor Thompson a écrit :
>> Could we hold off on promoting the image until this bug is resolved as
>> well: https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1292306
>> I believe it should be a blocker since it affects the lifecycle of the
>> m
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 6:38 AM, Nicholas Skaggs
wrote:
>>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-calendar-app/+bug/1293489
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-calendar-app/+bug/1294181
>
> https://code.launchpad.net/~nskaggs/ubuntu-calendar-app/standalone-ap-for-1293489/+merge/211854
> https://co
Le 19/03/2014 18:26, Didier Roche a écrit :
* sudoku-app has still one test failure (Alan/Jean-Baptiste):
A flaky AP test failure:
http://ci.ubuntu.com/smokeng/trusty/touch/mako/245:20140318.2:20140304/7250/sudoku_app/919515/
-> this one is on the non blocker list as it wasn't part of the CI
dash
On 20.03.2014 09:24, Selene Scriven wrote:
> I've also noticed that our media player doesn't seem to support
> very many video codecs. I had difficulty finding videos it can
> actually play. This most likely isn't a regression, but it'd be
> awfully nice if we could add in the full lavc / ffmp
* Didier Roche wrote:
> #246:
> ...
Just a short note about today's images. Image 247 had a small
regression which broke thumbnails (in the video carousel,
possibly elsewhere too). We got a fix tested from silo though,
and the fix seems to be included in image 248.
I've also noticed that ou
Le 19/03/2014 23:54, Victor Thompson a écrit :
Could we hold off on promoting the image until this bug is resolved as
well: https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1292306
I believe it should be a blocker since it affects the lifecycle of the
music-app.
Victor
I'll let QA decides if this i
On 03/19/2014 06:30 PM, Robert Park wrote:
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Didier Roche wrote:
** Blocking issues for image promotion **
* flaky test failure on calendar-app (Alan/Jean-Baptiste):
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-calendar-app/+bug/1293489
-> Chris pushed a fix for it. We are
Could we hold off on promoting the image until this bug is resolved as
well: https://bugs.launchpad.net/music-app/+bug/1292306
I believe it should be a blocker since it affects the lifecycle of the
music-app.
Victor
--
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-phone
Post to : ubuntu-phone@l
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 10:26 AM, Didier Roche wrote:
> ** Blocking issues for image promotion **
> * flaky test failure on calendar-app (Alan/Jean-Baptiste):
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-calendar-app/+bug/1293489
> -> Chris pushed a fix for it. We are waiting for a review and release.
Thi
On Wed, Mar 19, 2014 at 11:26 AM, Didier Roche wrote:
> ** Non blocking new issues since last promoted image (doesn't impact user
> experience or really rare bug) **
> * messaging app flaky test (Bill):
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/messaging-app/+bug/1293610
> -> put under that category as we di
On 03/19/2014 12:26 PM, Didier Roche wrote:
...
> * click-apparmor and apparmor-easyprof-ubuntu image tests failing with new
> ofono* (Jamie)
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/qa-regression-testing/+bug/1294667
> -> only impact testing, not user visible but understood now and getting fixed.
>
This is r
Hey,
good progress today to get to a Qt 5.2 first promotable image. We still
have some issues, but tried to categorize them to see if user-experience
wise and without lowering our testing level, we can promote an image soon.
We are still double checking all incoming and try to converge landin
29 matches
Mail list logo
