Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Call for testing: experimental 4.4.2 based images

2014-02-03 Thread Davide Depau
Hello guys, I'm new to this mailing list. I have a Nexus 7 2013 WiFi, and I'm interested in testing Ubuntu Touch; I actually tried it a few days ago. I'm also interested in development for Ubuntu Touch: I would like to help porting the Kivy toolkit to Ubuntu Touch. My problem, however, is that

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Where are the AOSP 4.4.2 repos? [was: Call for testing: experimental 4.4.2 based images]

2014-02-03 Thread Ricardo Salveti de Araujo
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 9:07 PM, f69m wrote: > Hello! > >> As some of you already know, I'm currently porting our Android code >> base to 4.4.2 (we're currently based on 4.2.2), and enabling support >> for a few additional devices (not all are officially supported though, >> but I'm happy to help t

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Executing binaries from click packages, under confinement

2014-02-03 Thread Michał Sawicz
On 03.02.2014 22:51, Jamie Strandboge wrote: Is this true? Doesn't the untrusted app call out to the trusted online accounts which is not part of this lifecycle group, and then online accounts calls the plugin? The unconfined app talks to online accounts over DBus; I'm not sure how online account

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 03.02.2014

2014-02-03 Thread Paul Larson
160 finished up testing a bit ago, and 161 is in progress now. There were quite a few failures of 160 on maguro but no opportunity to rerun anything before 161 kicked off. Only 2 failures on mako (notes-app which has had a few failures on/off lately, and a systemsettle test after calculator). 3 cr

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 03.02.2014

2014-02-03 Thread Didier Roche
Le 03/02/2014 20:18, David Barth a écrit : Le 03/02/2014 14:36, Didier Roche a écrit : Ok, some follow up: the image #162 failed to build due to ubuntu-html5-theme package that was supposed to not be uploaded that entered the archive, making the Touch image not buildable. Can you provide a po

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Executing binaries from click packages, under confinement

2014-02-03 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On 02/03/2014 03:10 PM, Michał Sawicz wrote: > On 03.02.2014 17:44, Jamie Strandboge wrote: >> At this point, I think I would suggest just using aa-exec-click, but note by >> doing so it will not be under application lifecycle since it is isn't running >> under upstart. I'm not sure how much of a c

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Executing binaries from click packages, under confinement

2014-02-03 Thread Ted Gould
On Mon, 2014-02-03 at 18:05 +0200, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > I'm now facing the choice of how to implement all the above; my original > idea was to execute the plugin with aa-exec-click, but before jumping on > that solution I'd like to double check with a wider audience. I've been > told that the

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 03.02.2014

2014-02-03 Thread Michał Sawicz
On 03.02.2014 19:17, Didier Roche wrote: However, dogfooding on that image showed another regression (click apps, when installed, are redirecting to a wrong installation slot). After some bisecting in images and then in packages, we found the unity8 version creating it (even trying versions that

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Executing binaries from click packages, under confinement

2014-02-03 Thread Michał Sawicz
On 03.02.2014 17:44, Jamie Strandboge wrote: At this point, I think I would suggest just using aa-exec-click, but note by doing so it will not be under application lifecycle since it is isn't running under upstart. I'm not sure how much of a concern this is. It is conceivable app authors could ab

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 03.02.2014

2014-02-03 Thread David Barth
Le 03/02/2014 14:36, Didier Roche a écrit : Ok, some follow up: the image #162 failed to build due to ubuntu-html5-theme package that was supposed to not be uploaded that entered the archive, making the Touch image not buildable. Can you provide a pointer to the build failure? I'd like to kno

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 03.02.2014

2014-02-03 Thread Didier Roche
Le 03/02/2014 18:17, Didier Roche a écrit : Hey, The regression hunting continued today. We had multiple random application tests failing on the 3 images over the week-end. The issue was in the image from Friday. We found that the applications doesn't seem to randomly starts even on mako an

[Ubuntu-phone] Landing team 03.02.2014

2014-02-03 Thread Didier Roche
Hey, The regression hunting continued today. We had multiple random application tests failing on the 3 images over the week-end. The issue was in the image from Friday. We found that the applications doesn't seem to randomly starts even on mako and upstart-app-launch was reverted to last goo

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Porting]Need help

2014-02-03 Thread ryan
Edit make files to remove that part so you can get a bootable image Looks like you don't have that file. (Could be a bad link to file) On 3 February 2014 16:24:25 GMT+00:00, Lukas Krotovic wrote: >Well, I tried it and got all needed files, but another error occurred. > >device/samsung/ancora/cam

[Ubuntu-phone] Executing binaries from click packages, under confinement

2014-02-03 Thread Alberto Mardegan
Hi all! One of the tasks I'm working on in Online Accounts is support for account plugins (those bits of code which are responsible to create/edit accounts for a specific provider, e.g. facebook) to be installed as click packages. For security reasons, the Online Accounts (from now on, "OA") ser

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Executing binaries from click packages, under confinement

2014-02-03 Thread Jamie Strandboge
On 02/03/2014 11:05 AM, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > Hi all! > One of the tasks I'm working on in Online Accounts is support for > account plugins (those bits of code which are responsible to create/edit > accounts for a specific provider, e.g. facebook) to be installed as > click packages. > > For

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Porting]Need help

2014-02-03 Thread Lukas Krotovic
Well, I tried it and got all needed files, but another error occurred. device/samsung/ancora/camerahal/cameraHAL.cpp:39:31: fatal error: ui/legacy/Overlay.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. make: *** [/home/lukas/Builds/ubuntu-phone/out/target/product/ancora/obj/SHARED_LIBRAR

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Question about off-topic comments in core-apps code

2014-02-03 Thread Michel RENON
Hi, Le 03/02/2014 14:45, Michael Spencer a écrit : Hello, I'm very sorry if that comment offended you in any way. I'd be happy to remove that if Canonical wants, but let me point out several things about that code. First, that code was not written for Canonical or the File Manager. It was writ

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Question about off-topic comments in core-apps code

2014-02-03 Thread Michel RENON
Hi, Le 03/02/2014 14:45, Michael Spencer a écrit : Hello, I'm very sorry if that comment offended you in any way. I'd be happy to remove that if Canonical wants, but let me point out several things about that code. First, that code was not written for Canonical or the File Manager. It was writ

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Question about off-topic comments in core-apps code

2014-02-03 Thread Michael Spencer
Thanks Alan for the answer. I'm leaving right now for work for a few hours, but I'll submit a MP as soon as I get back to remove the comments. Sorry for offending you, Michel, and anyone else. Thanks, Michael On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Alan Pope wrote: > Hi Michael, Michel, > > Firstly,

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Question about off-topic comments in core-apps code

2014-02-03 Thread Alan Pope
Hi Michael, Michel, Firstly, thank's Michel for raising this issue. I fully appreciate the issue and you did the right thing raising it on this list. Michael, thanks for the prompt response explaining the reason the boilerplate is there. On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:45 PM, Michael Spencer wrote: >

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Question about off-topic comments in core-apps code

2014-02-03 Thread Michael Spencer
Hello, I'm very sorry if that comment offended you in any way. I'd be happy to remove that if Canonical wants, but let me point out several things about that code. First, that code was not written for Canonical or the File Manager. It was written for a PERSONAL library of mine called ubuntu-ui-ex

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] Question about off-topic comments in core-apps code

2014-02-03 Thread Manuel de la Pena
On Mon, Feb 3, 2014 at 1:58 PM, Michel RENON wrote: > Hi, > > I noticed a comment in a source file of some core apps : > http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-filemanager-dev/ubuntu- > filemanager-app/trunk/view/head:/VerticalDivider.qml, lines 2:4. > It's obvious that such comment is completely off

[Ubuntu-phone] Question about off-topic comments in core-apps code

2014-02-03 Thread Michel RENON
Hi, I noticed a comment in a source file of some core apps : http://bazaar.launchpad.net/~ubuntu-filemanager-dev/ubuntu-filemanager-app/trunk/view/head:/VerticalDivider.qml, lines 2:4. It's obvious that such comment is completely off-topic in a source code, specially when it's an open-source ap

Re: [Ubuntu-phone] [Porting]Need help

2014-02-03 Thread Florian Will
Hi Lukas, Sounds like you need to extract proprietary files from a working phone. Cyanogenmod usually has a script to pull those files via adb. I don't remember the exact steps, but Google / the cyanogenmod wiki should help. Cheers, Florian Am 03.02.2014 11:45 schrieb "Lukas Krotovic" : > Hi, >

[Ubuntu-phone] [Porting]Need help

2014-02-03 Thread Lukas Krotovic
Hi, I'm trying to port Ubuntu Touch to Samsung Galaxy W but I got this error: make: *** No rule to make target `vendor/samsung/ancora/proprietary/bin/rild', needed by `/ubuntu-phone/out/target/product/ancora/system/bin/rild'. Stop. What can I do? Thanks. -- Mailing list: https://launchpad.