On Aug 26, 2009, at 6:57 AM, Mat Tomaszewski wrote:
>
> I'd personally hesitate to offer any of the above to my wife, mum, or
> anyone who I know is not deeply into "all things web". Would you? I'm
> very curious what are the experiences of people here, would be great
> to
> hear your stories an
On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Ryan Dwyer wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't matter how much work is involved. Do you think the
>> Linux/Ubuntu community would be willing to change the way system
>> logons work if it meant bug #1 could be completed?
>
> Let us see. To change the way
On Oct 22, 2009, at 2:56 AM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Steven Susbauer wrote:
>>
>> On Oct 21, 2009, at 10:56 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
>>
>>> Ryan Dwyer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> It doesn't matter how much work is involved. Do you think the
On Oct 24, 2009, at 7:25 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> I agree that all networks should be managed by an experienced
>> administrator,
>> but unfortunately a lot of them aren't. We can't change that. Many
>> businesses just want something that works and is easy to manage,
>> even if
>> there are
On Oct 25, 2009, at 2:12 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
And you thing that simple file sharing server based on SMB are
comparable to Mustang GT?
>>>
>>> No. But I think that running a public HTTP server is.
>>
>> Any user can run a public HTTP server without knowing what the hell
>> they are do
On Oct 25, 2009, at 10:25 AM, Dotan Cohen wrote:
>> If you feed yourself through Linux system administration you have an
>> interest in it being inaccessible.
>>
>
> Someone may feed himself by selling used books. He has no interest in
> learning sister admiration whatever that may be. He just wa
On Oct 25, 2009, at 11:10 AM, Chan Chung Hang Christopher wrote:
> Dotan Cohen wrote:
>>> For your information, Linux savvy companies tend to...
>>>
>>
>> Linux-savvy companies are not the issue here. GUI server tools will
>> attract mom 'n pop small businesses as well.
>>
>>
>
>
> Mom and pop sm
On Oct 27, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Shentino wrote:
> Just curious, but would Landscape have any feature set overlap with
> what we're talking about here? I read that canonical uses it
> commercially.
>
This has brought my focus back on the subject line for what we're all
replying to. I think i
On Oct 27, 2009, at 6:53 PM, Christopher Chan wrote:
> Hands up those who know end users that understand tcp/ip enough to
> decide on a static ip for the UDS server that will host the user
> account
> database, the update repository and the monitoring software.
So now you're what, bashing land
