On Oct 27, 2009, at 12:55 PM, Shentino wrote: > Just curious, but would Landscape have any feature set overlap with > what we're talking about here? I read that canonical uses it > commercially. >
This has brought my focus back on the subject line for what we're all replying to. I think it's been stated quite widely now that using a GUI to configure Apache, SMTP, etc is probably unwise (RHEL seems to disagree, but whatever), I don't think it is necessarily a bad thing to have a gui for domain server administration, or essentially what landscape is already doing, at least in part: controlling users, pushing updates, monitoring systems; it may be worth looking at. The Landscape client itself is GPL and could probably be used to reverse engineer a server to control it, if one wanted to do so. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
