On 9/13/07, Brian Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As Matthew Paul Thomas mentioned in a different e-mail it is important
> to make efficient use of the QA team. While having a lot of bugs in the
> "Incomplete" state would be one way of dealing with bugs with
> insufficient information, it wou
On 10/15/07, John Dong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is not very constructive. All of us here put our heart and effort
> into the distro and comments like this don't help. Exactly what things
> are bug-ridden that need attention? It's one thing to raise awareness of
> last-minute important bugs
On 10/16/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> If you can successfully argue why it's a udev bug, why is this argument
> not in the bug and why is the bug still marked "Incomplete" ?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/udev/+bug/132373
I didn't, I filed against cryptsetup wh
On 10/16/07, Scott James Remnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You mentioned udev in your mailing list post -- clearly you have some
> reason to suspect it should be fixed there, otherwise why mention it
> all?
Because the other person in the bug thought so enough to ask the udev
maintainers opini
On Dec 18, 2007 1:00 AM, Krzysztof Lichota <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why do you think so? I always run system update when I am doing other
> things. And I can notice when installing packages starts, although I
> have 3 GHz CPU.
My personal experience, is that on modern machines, install time i
