Hi,
With the current trend in Debian to move out of DSA into RSA [1], and
considering the theoretical (and probably correct) attack just presented
[2], what are we planning to do?
I am curious about the potential impacts -- compatibility, cost (both
CPU-wise and conversion-wise), and proposed Ub
On Fri, 2009-07-03 at 12:36 -0400, Andrew SB wrote:
> >
> > I like this. So maybe a rating system more along the lines of, "Did
> > this answer fix your problem?", instead of, "Digg it".
>
> Some thoughts:
>
> This sounds just like Launchpad Answers to me. How would the idea
> you're talking abo
On Wed, 2009-07-08 at 12:47 -0400, Evan wrote:
>
> The only issue I can find with this approach is that many new
> users are
> coming from windows. Have you tried using windows "help"? It
> does use
> an approach similar to this, and I would be afra
On Thu, 2009-07-09 at 08:13 +0800, Onno Benschop wrote:
> My experience in this scenario is that if you go down the path of
> individual pairing that paired support person becomes the single
> contact
> point for that user from then on. It happens today when a support
> request gets resolved the us
On Sat, 2009-08-01 at 19:49 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> I've found a bug (or maybe it's a feature request) in apt (or maybe it's
> in software-properties-gtk). I'd like to get people's opinions about
> where this is best reported, and what the report should say.
>
> When you add a repository
On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 17:56 +0200, Michael Bienia wrote:
> On 2009-08-01 19:49:33 +0100, Andrew Sayers wrote:
> > When you add a repository to your computer, then remove that repository,
> > it's not obvious how to downgrade packages that are no longer available.
>
> Downgrades are not supported,
On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 01:08 +0300, Dmitrijs Ledkovs wrote:
> 2009/8/1 Andrew Sayers :
> > When you add a repository to your computer, then remove that repository,
> > it's not obvious how to downgrade packages that are no longer available.
> >
>
> https://edge.launchpad.net/~xorg-edgers/+archive/p
For the record, this is the CD available on cdimages.ubuntu.com, dated of
20090929-2. This was the latest daily CD this morning (US-CDT time).
A brief introduction.
My laptop has been going through version upgrades since Hardy; I have been
running Karmic on it since pretty much the start. From la
Brendan Miller wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2009 at 1:06 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
>
>> There are millions of Ubuntu users, but only hundreds of developers...
>>
>
> The issue is that there is no one triaging incoming bugs, so the bug
> tracker has turned into a black hole for users. I'm sayi
Paul Smith wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-08 at 12:30 -0800, Brendan Miller wrote:
>
>> This bug more or less makes apt-get unusable on 64 bit systems and has
>> been in for a long time now:
>>
>> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/402833
>>
>
> Is this still a problem in Karmic? I don't hav
Brendan Miller wrote:
> Ah, Ok. I haven't updated any of my systems to 9.10, so I didn't
> realize that 32 bit compatibility had been removed... Given that, I
> probably just won't update since it would break adobe air and all my
> third party stuff...
>
>
I am afraid there is a misunderstanding
On 01/05/2010 02:56 PM, Patrick Freundt wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 5, 2010 at 9:43 PM, Remco wrote:
>
>> You can start a topic on ubuntuforums.org if you're not comfortable with IRC.
>>
> Just so I get this straight - you aswell as Brian Murray suggest, that
> bug reporting can not be handled wi
On 01/08/10 00:58, Marco Pallotta wrote:
> 2010/1/7 Charlie Kravetz :
>
>>
>> Ubuntu bugsquad already has a policy that workarounds should be
>> identified and moved into the bug description. If that was happening,
>> it should be easy to grab the section labeled "WORKAROUND:", right?
>>
>
Amahdy wrote:
> Maybe I'm missing something here (like I said in my early first post), but I
> even don't know how to set a total delivery for all messages sent here, I
> only receive a digest and there is no option to receive
> instant-notification, although I believe mailman has this option but m
On Fri, 05 Mar 2010 13:54:48 -0500
Ben Gamari wrote:
> Excerpts from Patrick Goetz's message of Fri Mar 05 13:27:52 -0500
> 2010:
> > So of course it only took a little digging to discover that smbd
> > and nmbd are now services started separately, and that (bizarrely)
> > there is now a winbind
On Wed, 24 Mar 2010 05:46:16 +
daen...@gmail.com wrote:
>This survey should take you only about two minutes
> and is designed to understand the computer usage of Ubuntu users and
> devs. Thank you in advance for your time.
Good.
Now, what is the objective? Where will resu
On Sat, 27 Mar 2010 17:59:10 -0700 (PDT)
Bruce Miller wrote:
Hello Bruce,
> I am not an Ubuntu developer; I learn a lot, however, from lurking on
> this list. If this is not the right forum to raise this issue, I
> would be grateful for a pointer in a better direction.
I would say that you are
Hi,
We currently daily build some packages that embed extensive tests in the
build process. I want to extend the tests for either build-time tests or
a binary that runs it.
I am now looking for either:
* packages with extensive tests on build time
* packages that build an extensive test binary
On 11/10/2010 03:12 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I believe that clamav would fit your criteria.
Indeed. Added for both Maverick and Natty.
Thank you, Scott
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify s
On 11/18/2010 09:49 AM, Marc Deslauriers wrote:
>>> Q: What if the openssh-server package is compromised on the ISO?
>>> A: Although this has happened before, it is relatively rare over the
>>> history of Ubuntu. If/when this happens again, we would need to:
>>>a) recommend that people choo
(with the bugSquad/Control admin hat on)
On 12/14/2010 01:56 PM, Andrew Starr-Bochicchio wrote:
>> > 1. Unlike many other excellent automatic responses, this one does not
>> > thank me for my bug report. It implies that for anything to be done
>> > for my bug report, I have to go and follow the in
On 02/23/2011 09:43 AM, Lukas Hejtmanek wrote:
> Hi,
>
> first of all, I'm running bleeding-edge unstable Ubuntu to test new features
> (and report bugs I got).
>
> Now I have the following issue. I tried to unhold mountall from 2.9 version
> and I tried to install 2.22 (the current in unstable).
On 02/11/11 00:25, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 01, 2011 at 05:52:16PM -0400, Martin Pitt wrote:
>>> Here's a link to an article that talks about Fedora's idea:
>>> http://www.h-online.com/open/news/item/Fedora-considers-moving-all-binaries-to-usr-bin-1369642.html?view=print
>>>
>> That w
On 02/04/12 15:27, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, April 02, 2012 08:58:20 PM Dale Amon wrote:
>> Oh and did I mention that some are only accessible
>> by ip or have unique ssh ports for security? I'm
>> not very good at remembering those at 3am.
> That's what ~/.ssh/config is for.
>
So to giv
On Wed, 11 Apr 2012 09:54:55 -0700
Dane Mutters wrote:
> If I might recommend one final thing...can the essence of this
> discussion be somehow posted in an easy-to-find place on Ubuntu's
> various web pages and forums? It would be helpful to have an
> official notice that "this is how it is, a
On Fri, 20 Apr 2012 12:25:24 -0400
Ray McCrum wrote:
>
> This should be an easy fix.
>
> This morning I tried to upgrade my Ubuntu 11.10 to the Ubuntu 12.04
> beta2-desktop-amd64, which did not work.
>
> I went into the Terminal and typed in this Line.
> ''sudo do-release-upgrade
On 27/09/12 07:51, Emmet Hikory wrote:
> Yes, this is contrived, etc. On the other hand, I suspect many
> of us have managed to be both Alice and Bob in a scenario much like
> that above when interrupted in the middle by some significant
> distraction, or just a sufficient span of time.
>
I
On 05/11/12 09:08, Jordon Bedwell wrote:
> This is from my perspective though
> and I have not really followed all too closely since I am the type of
> person to remove what I don't want and block stuff like Canonical's
> NTP and other tracking via our hardware firewalls instead of
> complaining ab
On Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:44:05 +0800
Ma Xiaojun wrote:
> warty-final-ubuntu.png is actually a JPEG file
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubuntu-wallpapers/+bug/296538
>
I thought in UNIX (and Linux, and similar) we did not depend on the
extension of a file name.
signature.asc
Descript
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:19:34 +0200
Xen wrote:
> > FWIW, this is the *only* reply to this thread that I will ever do.
> > I'm too busy following by secret agenda to reply to the other
> > mails...
>
> Rightly so! This is important work you do. You should be proud of it
> ;-).
How about you
On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 22:02:53 +0200
Xen wrote:
> C de-Avillez schreef op 21-07-2016 21:48:
> > On Thu, 21 Jul 2016 14:19:34 +0200
> > Xen wrote:
> >
> >
> >
> >> > FWIW, this is the *only* reply to this thread that I will ever
> >> >
On Mon, 26 Jun 2017 17:48:26 -0400
Jack Howarth wrote:
> Is there any official word from the Ubuntu kernel maintainers about
> their response to this issue just announced on the Debian mailing
> lists?
>
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2017/06/msg00308.html
>
> My understanding from Sys
On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 17:04:59 +
Debian FTP Masters wrote:
> zfs-linux_0.6.5.6-0ubuntu25.dsc: Refers to non-existing file
> 'zfs-linux_0.6.5.6.orig.tar.xz' Perhaps you need to include the file
> in your upload?
>
>
>
> ===
>
> Please feel free to respond to this email if you don't understan
33 matches
Mail list logo
