I see this in the changelog but no explanation why. I found it very
useful and extremely simple. Why was it removed?
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
The old zeroconf package (I know we're using avahi-autoipd) would
setup a zeroconf address on an interface in addition to any configured
or dhcp address. This worked fine for me. If I understand correctly
the current approach is to configure a link-local address only if no
static address was give
On 12/20/06, Ernst Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because it's buggy and unmaintained I guess? It was a very old version.
There are a good number of bugs logged against it in launchpad (some
of them are dups, I'll se if I can clean some up today) but it's not
unmaintained or old. A new vers
;? What standard?
>
>
> Joel Bryan Juliano wrote:
> On 12/22/06, Andrew Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 12/21/06, Joel Bryan Juliano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > All Ubuntu applications should create directories that it needs, when it
&
> Here are the "what it will take win" points from the essay:
>
> 1. Drivers for all major existing hardware.
> ...
Unfortunately what we need is not drivers for all major existing
hardware but drivers for all major hardware soon to exist. We're
always one step behind (or several) in this
On 12/28/06, Wes Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric and Rob's point there was that whichever 64-bit desktop takes the
> crown, one of the reasons will be because it had 64-bit drivers for all the
> existing hardware out there. Linux actually has an advantage over Windows in
> this regard sinc
On 1/3/07, Joel Bryan Juliano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Gnome HAL Device manager was showing too much "Unknown" entries, which
> is not very helpful for users.
> (optimistic users that is :-), pessimist love it)
>
> I think it should be better if it should hide the entries with Unknown
> str
> I would like to ask the devels not to include Flash 9 in our
> repositories... It is too damn buggy, and it's not worth the bad PR
> Feisty might get with crashing Firefoxes...
Since it's not included in main, or even restricted, it's not going to
change much to remove it from the repositories.
If I understand correctly they're reluctant to move to a new gparted
because of the integration with the installer. There are some
compelling bugs in 0.2.5 though.
On 2/12/07, Jan Claeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems like Feisty still only has GParted 0.2.5, while 0.3.3 should
> fix all k
I always install gnome-backgrounds. There are actually quite a few
GPL (not sure how that applies to photos, but whatever) packages of
excellent backgrounds. Not many are included in the Ubuntu
repositories though.
OpenSuSE has a few I like that can be had from this source rpm
(file-roller shoul
On 3/14/07, Conrad Knauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, what concerns me is that once you enable Remote Desktop there is
> no Notification Area icon indicating that its active and so it can
> easily be forgotten about.
There is in Feisty.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-dis
On 6/7/07, Johannes Kastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On openSuse 10.2 one can get access to the x-server with vnc, which is
> handled directly in the xorg.conf. Seems to be in the package
> xorg-x11-Xvnc-7.1-33.3.
In Ubuntu this is in the vnc4server (universe) package, the file is
/usr/lib/xorg/
On 6/7/07, Johannes Kastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can se a sample file in /usr/share/vnc4-common/examples/
>
> No. I have no directory named /usr/share/vnc4-common/. I only got
> /usr/share/doc/vnc4server and /usr/share/doc/vnc-common, but none of
> them contains a examples-directory.
Y
So did you get it working?
On 6/8/07, Johannes Kastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You'll need to install vnc4-common, which you'll also need to use to
> > create the vnc passwd file.
>
> If I need it for vnc4server to work, why is it not installed
> automatically when I install vnc4server?
>Fro
Would it make sense to promote nspluginwrapper [0] to main for amd64?
openSUSE will be including it in 10.3[1]. It seems a better solution
user-wise than including the still-alpha gnash.
[0] http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/nspluginwrapper/
[1]
http://en.opensuse.org/Factory/News#Changes_
ing a bluetooth mouse (kudos to
the bluez devs!).
My experience with the system-config-printer folks was also very
gratifying. And the work on xserver-xorg-video-intel has not gone
unnoticed on my machine. Many many thanks to you all!
- Andrew Jorgensen
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-
16 matches
Mail list logo
