What (who?) is the right mechanism to re-point a country-level Ubuntu
archive DNS entry, after we have confirmed agreement from the hosting
organisation?
Many thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel J Blueman
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubs
On 22 July 2013 16:34, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> What (who?) is the right mechanism to re-point a country-level Ubuntu
> archive DNS entry, after we have confirmed agreement from the hosting
> organisation?
>
Information about becoming country mirror is at:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Mirrors
Includ
By large, developers are uninterested in this, but it is important for
users and where we use Ubuntu.
Anyone care to comment on how we can progress this?
On 15 July 2013 13:32, Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> From earlier feedback, there were no overriding reasons why package
> sources should be enabl
On Tuesday, July 23, 2013 11:02:00 AM Daniel J Blueman wrote:
> By large, developers are uninterested in this, but it is important for
> users and where we use Ubuntu.
>
> Anyone care to comment on how we can progress this?
I think most developers would believe the current situation is appropriat
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 01:51:46AM -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think most developers would believe the current situation is appropriate.
I disagree.
> By default users have the same access to source and binary packages and for a
> free software distribution, that is the ethically correct
(pardon the top-posting)
I think the slight reduction in ethics (relevant mainly to developers)
is a good trade to help deployability in the real world. We'll leave
sources enabled by default for development releases.
For the other 99% of users, where practicality is more important than
immediate
