On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:53 -0500, Benjamin Root wrote:
>> Sounds like to me that it is a finer grained version of "Invalid".
>> The idea being that rather than possibly insulting the OP with an
>> "Invalid" statement, one could mark it as "Opi
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:29:36 Evan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:53 -0500, Benjamin Root wrote:
> >> Sounds like to me that it is a finer grained version of "Invalid".
> >> The idea being that rather than possibly insulting the OP
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:48 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:29:36 Evan wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin wrote:
> > > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:53 -0500, Benjamin Root wrote:
> > >> Sounds like to me that it is a finer grained version of "Invalid
On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:29 -0400, Evan wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:53 -0500, Benjamin Root wrote:
> >> Sounds like to me that it is a finer grained version of "Invalid".
> >> The idea being that rather than possibly insulting the OP wi
Bruno Girin [2010-07-07 18:17 +0100]:
> You do have bugs that are reported that are really a matter of
> opinion as to whether they should be addressed or not.
But that's exactly what "wontfix" is for -- an opinionated choice to
not do something about a bug which could potentially be changed/fixed
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 13:17:19 Bruno Girin wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:48 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:29:36 Evan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin
wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:53 -0500, Benjamin Root wrote:
> > >
On Wed, 07 Jul 2010 18:17:19 +0100
Bruno Girin wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:48 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:29:36 Evan wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin wrote:
> > > > On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 09:53 -0500, Benjamin Root wrote:
> > > >
On 07/07/2010 01:08 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 13:17:19 Bruno Girin wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:48 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:29:36 Evan wrote:
On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 11:21 AM, Bruno Girin
> wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 18:34:41 Micah Gersten wrote:
> On 07/07/2010 01:08 PM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 13:17:19 Bruno Girin wrote:
> >> On Wed, 2010-07-07 at 11:48 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 11:29:36 Evan wrote:
> On Wed,
Forwarding Brian Murray's response from the ubuntu-bugsquad list.
Original Message
Subject: Re: How to use the new Launchpad status?
Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 16:12:22 -0700
From: Brian Murray
Organization: Ubuntu
To: ubuntu-bugsq...@lists.ubuntu.com
On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 10:48:2
What is the reason for stopping development on sunbird?
--
Bob Holtzman
Key ID: 8D549279
"If you think you're getting free lunch,
check the price of the beer"
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify setting
Hello Brian,
Micah Gersten [2010-07-07 20:06 -0500]:
> Forwarding Brian Murray's response from the ubuntu-bugsquad list.
> As an example there might be a bug about Ubuntu bug reports not being
> fixed which will not stay in an Invalid status because that issue
> happens to be an important matter t
12 matches
Mail list logo
