Re: Removal of PulseAudio from Ubuntu

2010-05-13 Thread Darren Albers
For what it is worth add me to the list of people happy with PulseAudio. In my opinion we are better off fixing the remaining issues than ripping it out and replacing it with something else. It feels like this is a case of the few having issues and the resulting noise distracting from a real su

Device label being shown none on Ubuntu server 10.04

2010-05-13 Thread Kaushal Shriyan
Hi, I have not understood about the device label being none on Ubuntu Server 10.04 and on Ubuntu Server 8.04 it appears to be correct. Please help me understand about it. On a 8.04 Ubuntu Server FilesystemTypeSize Used Avail Use% Mounted on /dev/sda1 xfs461G 118G 343G 26% /

Re: Removal of PulseAudio from Ubuntu

2010-05-13 Thread Daniel Hollocher
On Thu, May 13, 2010 at 1:16 PM, Darren Albers wrote: > For what it is worth add me to the list of people happy with > PulseAudio.   In my opinion we are better off fixing the remaining > issues than ripping it out and replacing it with something else. And on that note, I have performed a trivial

Better 3+ monitor support

2010-05-13 Thread John Fano
Hi Everyone, First let me say that you've done fantastic work to get Ubuntu to where it is. Lucid is just awesome, and I'm really looking forward to Unity. So I've been trying for a while to get 3 monitors going in Lucid and keep Compiz-Fusion. After many Google and Ubuntu forum searches I foun