For what it is worth add me to the list of people happy with PulseAudio. In my opinion we are better off fixing the remaining issues than ripping it out and replacing it with something else.
It feels like this is a case of the few having issues and the resulting noise distracting from a real success. This is not to diminish their frustrations since those are legit but threads like this do not solve anything. On 5/12/10, Flávio Etrusco <flavio.etru...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 3:38 AM, Luke Yelavich <them...@ubuntu.com> wrote: >> On Wed, May 12, 2010 at 06:06:10AM CEST, Shentino wrote: >>> Also, I question the wisdom of having audio specific bluetooth support. >>> >>> My hunches tell me that a proper bluetooth support layer would be better. >> >> What do you mean by proper bluetooth support layer? We already have that, >> and it does a good job of managing bluetooth. While it is possible to use >> bluetooth devices with ALSA, there is no good UI for managing this easily, >> and the interface itslf is clunky. PulseAudio elps a lot by talking >> directly to bluez, the support layer for bluetooth. It is then very easy >> to use bluetooth devices from a user perspective, with a good UI to manage >> things. >> >> Luke > > Ditto. > PulseAudio developers and maintainers maintain (oops) that sound > skipping now is almost always caused be alsa driver issues and these > will be fleshed out - and I tend to agree. > I used to be a big PA hater, but now it's working beautifully for all > but one machine I've tried. (And bluetooth support is fantastic) > Will we just stop this thread, please? > > Best regards, > Flávio > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: > https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss > -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
