Re: Question regarding A828_Installer_x64_0.28-Beta

2010-02-12 Thread Evan
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 2:59 AM, David Hunter wrote: > I have the above mentioned driver installed in my system (currently > running Ubuntu 10.04). I find it frustrating that every time I update > the kernel, I have to re-install the driver. is there a way I can > update the driver module without

Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

2010-02-12 Thread Patrick Goetz
I just filed a bug against the 64-bit Karmic (9.10) server edition on bugs.launchpad.net and noticed that the process appears to have regressed considerably. First of all, there is no longer any clear indication on the front page of bugs.launchpad.net about how one goes about filing a bug, even

Quality Control in Ubuntu Server

2010-02-12 Thread Patrick Goetz
Last week I tried to upgrade a battered old Debian server running linux 2.6.3 to a sparkling new machine running Ubuntu Karmic 64-bit AMD server. The old Debian server was working perfectly, but had basically run out of disk space. After 12 hours, I had to concede defeat, and rolled back to t

Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

2010-02-12 Thread Charlie Kravetz
On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 12:17:47 -0600 Patrick Goetz wrote: > I just filed a bug against the 64-bit Karmic (9.10) server edition on > bugs.launchpad.net and noticed that the process appears to have > regressed considerably. > > First of all, there is no longer any clear indication on the front pag

Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

2010-02-12 Thread Brian Murray
On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 12:17:47PM -0600, Patrick Goetz wrote: > I just filed a bug against the 64-bit Karmic (9.10) server edition on > bugs.launchpad.net and noticed that the process appears to have > regressed considerably. > > First of all, there is no longer any clear indication on the fron

Re: Bug reporting for Ubuntu Server? WTF?

2010-02-12 Thread Mario Vukelic
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 11:47 -0700, Charlie Kravetz wrote: > Having used all these methods to file bugs, I have never been stopped > from commenting on the bug report before all of the automatic methods > attached the log files and filled in commentary. I think the problem is that ubuntu-bug excep

remove the myspell-ro package from Lucid

2010-02-12 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
Hi, Until Lucid the Romanian dictionary was received from the myspell-ro package. This package has an old version of the dictionary. In Lucid a new package (hunspell-ro) with newer version of the dictionary was generated from the openoffice.org-dictionaries source package. As the older package is

Re: remove the myspell-ro package from Lucid

2010-02-12 Thread Arne Goetje
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote: > Hi, > > Until Lucid the Romanian dictionary was received from the myspell-ro package. > This package has an old version of the dictionary. > > In Lucid a new package (hunspell-ro) with newer version of the > dictionary was generated from the openoffice.org-dictiona

Re: remove the myspell-ro package from Lucid

2010-02-12 Thread Lucian Adrian Grijincu
On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Arne Goetje wrote: > I have updated the dependencies for language-support-writing-ro already > to include hunspell-ro instead of myspell-ro. So, if nothing else > depends on myspell-ro, it should not be pulled automatically anymore. Ok thanks :) There's just one

Re: remove the myspell-ro package from Lucid

2010-02-12 Thread Arne Goetje
Lucian Adrian Grijincu wrote: > On Sat, Feb 13, 2010 at 6:30 AM, Arne Goetje > wrote: >> I have updated the dependencies for language-support-writing-ro already >> to include hunspell-ro instead of myspell-ro. So, if nothing else >> depends on myspell-ro, it should not be pulled automatically any