Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 00:31 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>
>> My initial testing showed that this didn't work in all cases I checked.
>> The only reason we need anything at all is backward compatibility.
>> The whole idea here is to get rid of the need to manually load the
>
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-04-08 at 15:24 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>
>> I'm constructing a list of maintainers to include in discussion about a
>> kernel change to the autofs and autofs4 kernel modules that I expect to
>> submit some time in the future. It has the potential to be fair
Hey all,
I am a master CS student and during my little start-up initiative I
encountered a problem, which I believe must also be in the open source
world. How do you decide which feature to implement next? Normally you would
have limited resources and a ton of feature ideas, some of them came from
Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-04-14 at 23:25 +0800, Ian Kent wrote:
>
>> The change I'm planning on proposing is to remove the autofs kernel
>> module and rename the autofs4 module to autofs. This has implications
>> for older modprobe code in init scripts as a MODULE_ALIAS() can't do
On 14/04/09 23:32, Nikolay Kazmin wrote:
> Hey all,
> I am a master CS student and during my little start-up initiative I
> encountered a problem, which I believe must also be in the open source
> world. How do you decide which feature to implement next? Normally you would
> have limited resources
Hi,
This is just a small ”thank you” and also ”just look at that” kind of
post. The thing that should be looked at is:
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/TranslatingUbuntu/JauntyTranslationIssues
Virtually all I18N issues that were a) never fixed in eg. intrepid (or
earlier) b) found out as new (having exi
Olá hakaishi e a todos.
On Monday 06 April 2009 10:45:24 hakai...@web.de wrote:
> Whenever I open a partition the window opens in background. As far as I read
> in some Forums
> people are also annoyed about the POP-UPs that open in background, like the
> info-pop-up
> for rebooting because of s
Hi all,
Once upon a time :-)
Six months ago I filed a bug against Mesa for Ubuntu 8.04.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/283175
I supplied the effects, test case and even a backported patch. This then
gets wishlisted to sit idle for six months until today.
After pain of deal
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 19:20 +0100, Philip Wyett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Once upon a time :-)
>
> Six months ago I filed a bug against Mesa for Ubuntu 8.04.
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/mesa/+bug/283175
>
> I supplied the effects, test case and even a backported patch. This then
>
Hello Philip,
Philip Wyett [2009-04-15 19:20 +0100]:
> After pain of dealing with the RC Mesa in Ubuntu 8.04 ever since, I
> decided to email the technical board about why it and all releases
> should be based on a full release of Mesa + patches only, giving
> developers a clean base to work with.
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 23:01 +0200, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Hello Philip,
>
> Philip Wyett [2009-04-15 19:20 +0100]:
> > After pain of dealing with the RC Mesa in Ubuntu 8.04 ever since, I
> > decided to email the technical board about why it and all releases
> > should be based on a full release of M
On Wed, 2009-04-15 at 23:48 +0100, Mark Shuttleworth wrote:
>
> I think being on an RC, as opposed to a final release, is as awkward
> for us as it is for everyone else. It makes all of our updates harder,
> because the codebase is unique to us, it's not a release that upstream
> cares about. So,
12 matches
Mail list logo
