What in this set of updates is making my system reboot?
I dont see anything kernel related in there!
Plus, this set of updates left my system unconfigure, and not even a dpkg
--configure -a is working.
I've open a LP ticket with the ID: #271246
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+bug/271246
--
BU
2008/9/17 (``-_-´´) -- Fernando <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> What in this set of updates is making my system reboot?
> I dont see anything kernel related in there!
> Plus, this set of updates left my system unconfigure, and not even a dpkg
> --configure -a is working.
>
> I've open a LP ticket with the I
Olá Chris e a todos.
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 09:09:24 Chris Coulson wrote:
> It is Network Manager that required you to reboot (apologies if that wasn't
> really what you were asking - I've only caught the tail-end of this
> conversation).
Thanks. And this was the very 1st email to the lis
Hi!
this is an excerpt from the actual popcon dataset sorted by vote
1 perl-base 150701
2 debianutils 150375
...
10popularity-contest145894
this means that popularity-contest was touched/used by 145 894
installations, so they were the one
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 10:54 +0200, Viktor Nagy wrote:
> Hi!
>
> this is an excerpt from the actual popcon dataset sorted by vote
>
> 1 perl-base 150701
> 2 debianutils 150375
> ...
> 10popularity-contest145894
>
> this means that popula
>> Is there an easy way to reject the EULA on the Firefox shipped with
>> Ubuntu and still be able to use the software? Has anyone patched the
>> source code to remove this yet?
>>
*SNIP*
>
>This is on Fedora, but should help:
>http://www.toad.com/gnu/sysadmin/index.html#firefox-eula-sux
Morgan,
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 14:14 +0100, Sean Hodges wrote:
> It seems no'one has looked into this yet, so I will have a look this
> weekend.
There has recently been an announcement from Mozilla that they're going
to fix this. See, for example, the coverage in Groklaw (even if you
don't like Groklaw th
I have treid and used , reinstalled ubuntu many times , I find it a pain to
install software *WITHOUT THE INTERNET *- so I'm currently using debian
because it has over* 21* cds with a HUGE software respitory.
And yes I've tried to install debian packages on ubuntu - the whole
toolchain is messed
Olá jude e a todos.
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 14:27:29 jude ui wrote:
> I have treid and used , reinstalled ubuntu many times , I find it a pain to
> install software *WITHOUT THE INTERNET *- so I'm currently using debian
> because it has over* 21* cds with a HUGE software respitory.
>
> And
Am 17.09.2008 um 15:27 schrieb jude ui:
> I have treid and used , reinstalled ubuntu many times , I find it a
> pain to install software WITHOUT THE INTERNET
As you are discussing with developers: please go ahead, single out
what exactly you have problems with, file a bug for each of the
p
On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 15:13 +0100, =?ISO-8859-1?Q?
(``-=5F-=B4=B4)_--_Fernando _ wrote:
> Olá jude e a todos.
>
> On Wednesday 17 September 2008 14:27:29 jude ui wrote:
> > I have treid and used , reinstalled ubuntu many times , I find it a pain to
> > install software *WITHOUT THE INTERNET *- so
On Wed, Sep 17, 2008 at 02:14:47PM +0100, Sean Hodges wrote:
> >> Is there an easy way to reject the EULA on the Firefox shipped with
> >> Ubuntu and still be able to use the software? Has anyone patched the
> >> source code to remove this yet?
> >>
> *SNIP*
> >
> >This is on Fedora, but should hel
All this talk recently of the boneheads over at Firefox adding an EULA (they
are not usually boneheads, but are this time) has me revisiting an idea that I
had some time ago. My plate is extremely busy right now, so if anyone wants to
steal it, feel free. As a matter of fact, I encourage someo
On Wednesday 17 September 2008 09:22, Paul Smith wrote:
> On Wed, 2008-09-17 at 14:14 +0100, Sean Hodges wrote:
> > It seems no'one has looked into this yet, so I will have a look this
> > weekend.
>
> There has recently been an announcement from Mozilla that they're going
> to fix this. See, for
Am 17.09.2008 um 19:21 schrieb Kevin Fries:
> Next we create a special package we can call ubuntu-desktop-
> licensed that will automatically include all of the licensed and
> commercial software [...]
IMHO, forget it. Neither Microsoft nor Apple nor one of the smaller
vendors will ever all
On 13/09/08 11:48, Martin Owens wrote:
> Technically configuration directories denoted by being hidden
> (suffexed with a '.') are there to hold collections of configuration
> files for the applications which they serve. But there are plenty of
> programs using these directories to store the data r
> I think this idea is extremely valuable and merits robust discussion to
> discover ways to encourage application developers to incorporate this
> way of approaching data storage.
Thank you, I'm not always as coherent as I'd like when I describe my
ideas and knowing it made sense to you gives me
>
> Hi,
>
> I think it would be important to distinguish between a local cache of a
> remote IMAP or CalDAV folder (i.e. Configuration) vs. local mail
> folders, calendars, contact lists, etc. (Data).
>
I agree, I regretted not making a note about cache data. Caches are
temporary stores, if it mak
Shouldn't the Telepathy framework be considered for storing account settings?
Remco
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
Hey all,
If you have any spare time, and feel like testing Ubuntu, the Ubuntu
Release Team would appreciate more testers for the Intrepid Ibex Alpha 6
ISOs. The standard warnings about how it might kill your hard drive,
etc, might apply - but no one's found them this far. These images
should be
Might kill my hard dirve??? In what sense? I'm not touching them!
On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:23 +1000, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> The standard warnings about how it might kill your hard drive,
> etc, might apply - but no one's found them this far.
>
>
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-dev
Nergar wrote:
> On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:23 +1000, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
>
>> The standard warnings about how it might kill your hard drive,
>> etc, might apply - but no one's found them this far.
>>
>
> Might kill my hard dirve??? In what sense? I'm not touching them!
>
Might be referring
On 9/18/08, Jason Crain <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nergar wrote:
> > On Thu, 2008-09-18 at 12:23 +1000, Sarah Hobbs wrote:
> >
> >> The standard warnings about how it might kill your hard drive,
> >> etc, might apply - but no one's found them this far.
> >>
> >
> > Might kill my hard dirve
23 matches
Mail list logo
