Re: Bugs marked incomplete

2008-09-02 Thread Chris Coulson
2008/9/2 Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:54:21AM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote: > > On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > > First, afaik automatic-expiration is not enabled for Ubuntu. It tracks > > > when bugs will expire

Re: Bugs marked incomplete

2008-09-02 Thread Bryce Harrington
On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 08:04:43AM +0100, Chris Coulson wrote: > Unfortunately, some triagers do just close bugs when they are marked ready > to expire, without actually checking whether the reporter provided the > requested information. I have re-opened one such report recently, although I > don't

Re: Bugs marked incomplete

2008-09-02 Thread James Westby
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 23:32 +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote: > Hello, > > Bugs that are marked incomplete and subsequently get a reply from the > original reporter often stay in the incomplete status. This means they > automatically get closed even though the needed info was provided. I > think it would

PackageKit: Call for testing

2008-09-02 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
The APT backend for PackageKit [1] has made a lot of progress recently in the 0.3.x series. It nearly supports all features of PackageKit. Highlights of the 0.3.x series are: * Search for codecs and mime type handlers * Local file installation * Change log for updates * G

CDBS and upstream changelogs

2008-09-02 Thread Pär Andersson
Hi, I recently discovered a missing upstream changelog in a package, and after some confusion I found that it was caused by CDBS. Here is the relevant CDBS changelog: cdbs (0.4.49ubuntu3) hardy; urgency=low ... * debhelper.mk.in: Do not install upstream changelogs by default. They are hug

Re: Intrepid compatibility with C3 CPUs

2008-09-02 Thread Oliver Grawert
hi, On Mo, 2008-08-18 at 19:31 +0100, Sam Tygier wrote: > Hi > > The current intrepid test releases will not boot on machines with Via C3 > CPUs. At boot the message: > > "This kernel requires the following features not present on the CPU: cmov > Unable to boot - please use a kernel appropriate

Re: CDBS and upstream changelogs

2008-09-02 Thread Martin Pitt
Pär Andersson [2008-09-02 12:57 +0200]: > I realize that I am probably not the mentioned "ordinary user". However I do > find it very annoying to have to manually download huge source packages just > to read what have changed in a newly installed version of a package. We deliberately made this

Re: Bugs marked incomplete

2008-09-02 Thread Brian Murray
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:32:20PM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote: > Hello, > > Bugs that are marked incomplete and subsequently get a reply from the > original reporter often stay in the incomplete status. This means they > automatically get closed even though the needed info was provided. I > think i

Re: Bugs introduced in GCC?

2008-09-02 Thread Colin Watson
On Sun, Aug 17, 2008 at 06:32:41PM -0400, Richard M. Stallman wrote: > Are the statements below true? > Is the Ubuntu patch really 5 MB? It is, although bear in mind that that includes a large volume of packaging infrastructure; 1.3 MB of files in the Ubuntu patch have nothing to do with patching

Re: Bugs marked incomplete

2008-09-02 Thread (``-_-´´) -- Fernando
Olá James e a todos. On Tuesday 02 September 2008 10:28:50 James Westby wrote: > I have seen this feature in a list of the launchpad teams possible plans for > LP 3.0, so it may be something that happens soon. I guess Bugs should work as Answers does. Once the OP replies, it changes the state, u

Re: Bugs marked incomplete

2008-09-02 Thread Thomas Novin
On Mon, 2008-09-01 at 23:32 +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote: > Bugs that are marked incomplete and subsequently get a reply from the > original reporter often stay in the incomplete status. This means they > automatically get closed even though the needed info was provided. I > think it would be a good i

Re: OpenOffice 3 and Firefox 3.1 in Intrepid?

2008-09-02 Thread Matthias Klose
Vishal Rao schrieb: > What about other packages like Eclipse (which currently shows at 3.2) did you package 3.4? very cool! where can I find the package? Matthias -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubunt

Re: PackageKit: Call for testing

2008-09-02 Thread Luke L
It's packagekit-gnome, not 'gnome-packagekit'. Worked fine for me. Are we supposed to be critiquing the software? It was a bit minimalist, and the frames in the windows are not resize-able. It doesn't seem as full featured as Synaptic, though it has a good look to it. It's info area is better laid

Re: PackageKit: Call for testing

2008-09-02 Thread Sebastian Heinlein
Am Dienstag, den 02.09.2008, 23:50 -0500 schrieb Luke L: > It's packagekit-gnome, not 'gnome-packagekit'. > > Worked fine for me. Are we supposed to be critiquing the software? It > was a bit minimalist, and the frames in the windows are not > resize-able. It doesn't seem as full featured as Synap