Le Sun, 27 Jan 2008 15:21:25 -0500,
"Bryan Quigley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> a écrit :
> why not include it by default early
> on to get more testing?
Indeed +1
--
Patrice Vetsel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Aka/Alias Kagou
https://launchpad.net/people/vetsel-patrice
gpg key: 0x15c094db
signature.asc
Des
On Mon, 2008-01-28 at 00:33 +, Fergal Daly wrote:
> So let me rephrase my points
>
> 1 there are multiple tools which do roughly the same thing - see,
> gnome-open and probably k-something-or-other and no unified location
> for preferences for these tools
We have xdg-open, part of xdg-utils,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Fergal Daly wrote:
>...
On Sun, Jan 27, 2008 at 02:01:56AM +, Fergal Daly wrote:
>
> Seems like you could achieve much the same thing by having command
> (let's call it "o" for open so it's nice and short) that checks the
> mi
Fergal Daly wrote:
> [...]
>
> So let me rephrase my points
>
> 1 there are multiple tools which do roughly the same thing - see,
> gnome-open and probably k-something-or-other and no unified location
> for preferences for these tools
>
> 2 multiple tools which do roughly the same thing is no probl
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:58:00PM +, John Carr wrote:
> > > If the MD5SUMS files are purely for validating downloads[3], could the
> > > completely useless/misleading GPG files be dropped?
> >
> > They are far from useless - they are the only way to validate the hash
> > information based on t
Dear all,
Apache::ASP is a perl implementation of Active Server Pages. The package
libapache-asp-perl was removed from Gutsy with the comment "Package is
Apache 1.x specific which no longer resides in the archive". However, it
is installable and works correctly on Gutsy with Apache 2.2, and we are
Hi Dan,
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 03:02:25PM +, Dan Sheridan wrote:
> I'd like to see this package re-added to Hardy. What is the best
> approach? Should I prepare an updated package with trimmed dependencies
> and upload to REVU? Should it be renamed libapache2-asp-perl?
>
The process to get
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 04:44:05PM +0200, Lars Wirzenius wrote:
> On ti, 2008-01-22 at 19:32 +, Chris Lamb wrote:
> > However, the MD5 digest algorithm is utterly broken
>
> How broken is it? Can one reasonably expect that a well-provisioned
> attacker can create an MD5SUMS file that has the
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 05:20:52PM +, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:28:48AM -0700, Neal McBurnett wrote:
> > > (I'm all in favor of moving to SHA256 or whatever is considered best
> > > practice these days. I've just not heard that MD5 is really as broken as
> > > I think C
On Monday 28 January 2008 10:02, Dan Sheridan wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Apache::ASP is a perl implementation of Active Server Pages. The package
> libapache-asp-perl was removed from Gutsy with the comment "Package is
> Apache 1.x specific which no longer resides in the archive". However, it
> is inst
On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 09:28:48AM -0700, Neal McBurnett wrote:
> > (I'm all in favor of moving to SHA256 or whatever is considered best
> > practice these days. I've just not heard that MD5 is really as broken as
> > I think Chris suggests here.)
>
> One easy thing to do is to also publish sha256
> > If the MD5SUMS files are purely for validating downloads[3], could the
> > completely useless/misleading GPG files be dropped?
>
> They are far from useless - they are the only way to validate the hash
> information based on trust roots that are (or should be) on your
> system already.
>
> Neal
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: RIPEMD160
Neal McBurnett wrote:
|
| That ftpmaster key is already on installed systems, right? I would
| think we could preinstall system keyrings and give instructions that
| would be based on that. Do we not ship the <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> key?
GnuPG's loc
Hi all,
I did a listing of grub. I have installed grub 1.95
aptitude search grub
p ggz-grubby - GGZ
Gaming Zone: chat bot with the ability to play games
p ggz-grubby-dbgsym - debug
symbols for package ggz-
[I've been sending, like the original poster, to both lists, and
different responses from different people have gone to each list. But
we should probably choose just one of these lists to use for this
conversation I'd choose the -devel-discuss list since my postings
to the -devel list have to
15 matches
Mail list logo
