Visit this website ...
http://asher256-repository.tuxfamily.org/index.php?page=home&lang=en
It'll bring you firefox 2.0 on dapper via apt !
It's a repository with some programs which are not included in some ubuntu
versions ... like firefox 2.0 in dapper.
--
Mehdi Dogguy
http://dogguy.org
GNU/Lin
hi
http://www.ubuntu.com
is realy neat.
bye Thilo
--
i am on Ubuntu 2.6 KDE
- some friend of mine
gpg key: 0x4A411E09
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discus
On 3/18/07, Mehdi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Visit this website ...
> http://asher256-repository.tuxfamily.org/index.php?page=home&lang=en
> It'll bring you firefox 2.0 on dapper via apt !
> It's a repository with some programs which are not included in some ubuntu
> versions ... like firefox 2.0
oh yes i didn't mentioned it but you can also install a language extension !
and you'll have your firefox with what ever language you want.
--
Mehdi Dogguy
http://dogguy.org
GNU/Linux user #371248
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsub
Thilo Six wrote the following on 18.03.2007 12:21:
> hi
>
> http://www.ubuntu.com
>
> is realy neat.
and what realy good is that visited links are much better readable even when
"underline links" is turned off.
Thanks ;)
>
>
> bye Thilo
--
i am on Ubuntu 2.6 KDE
- some friend of mine
gpg
Mehdi wrote the following on 18.03.2007 12:32:
> oh yes i didn't mentioned it but you can also install a language
> extension ! and you'll have your firefox with what ever language you want.
>
> --
> Mehdi Dogguy
...and you forget to mention that users who install that firefox should
request sup
no ... i didn't because it's no so important .. asher does only compile
packages for dapper and other versions, he did not change the source code !
so in case of bugs, you'll refer to mozilla ! that's my point of view !
--
Mehdi Dogguy
http://dogguy.org
GNU/Linux user #371248
--
Ubuntu-devel-dis
Mehdi wrote the following on 18.03.2007 13:16:
> no ... i didn't because it's no so important .. asher does only compile
> packages for dapper and other versions, he did not change the source
> code ! so in case of bugs, you'll refer to mozilla ! that's my point of
> view !
sorry i think you didn´
i never had a problem with that.
i never thought that it was so important to you ...
anyway, if you don't like this manner of adding programs on your disto,
don't use it. that's all !
i'm sorry but if you look at the other repositories for debian or ubuntu
packages, they don't give always assitanc
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 02:35:14PM +0100, Mehdi wrote:
> i never had a problem with that.
> i never thought that it was so important to you ...
> anyway, if you don't like this manner of adding programs on your disto, don't
> use it. that's all !
> i'm sorry but if you look at the other repositorie
Mehdi wrote:
> i never had a problem with that.
> i never thought that it was so important to you ...
> anyway, if you don't like this manner of adding programs on your disto,
> don't use it. that's all !
The problem is that you are recommending packages without also
mentioning that support for
http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/The_QEMU_Accelerator_KQEMU_Module_is_Open_Source
Should kqemu be in fesity+1 when it's released?
--
Alec Wright
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listin
Hello, I'm a new ubuntu-deve-discuss user, I've just signed in.
My name is Nicolò, I'm from Italy and I'm graduated at informatics engineering.
I own an asus laptop and I run ubuntu on it. I've been using ubuntu since a lot
of time, and I think that it is great.
My request goes to the acpi-suppor
On 3/18/07, Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is a big deal only because of the sheer volume of support requests
> repositories like this generate to ubuntu.
Mozilla.com should really offer a deb for all major distros for all
their versions, IMHO.
A tar.gz is not good enough.
/Chris
--
On 3/16/07, Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I fail to see why UC[34] would require unauthenticated access.
> > Passwords do not take long to enter. I can enter my secure password in
> > around 1sec, no more than 2sec. And a simple password of say '123',
> > while not in any means secure is a
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:54:35PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
> http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/The_QEMU_Accelerator_KQEMU_Module_is_Open_Source
> Should kqemu be in fesity+1 when it's released?
kqemu is already in feasty. But it's still at the non GPL version, so
it's in multiverse. Look for the kq
On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 19:01 +0100, Mikael Eriksson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:54:35PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
> > http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/The_QEMU_Accelerator_KQEMU_Module_is_Open_Source
> > Should kqemu be in fesity+1 when it's released?
>
> kqemu is already in feasty. But it's
Christoffer Sørensen wrote:
> On 3/18/07, Mike Fedyk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> It is a big deal only because of the sheer volume of support requests
>> repositories like this generate to ubuntu.
>
> Mozilla.com should really offer a deb for all major distros for all
> their versions, IMHO.
>
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:59:54PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 19:01 +0100, Mikael Eriksson wrote:
> > On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:54:35PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
> > > http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/The_QEMU_Accelerator_KQEMU_Module_is_Open_Source
> > > Should kqemu be in fe
Mikael Eriksson wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:59:54PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
>> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 19:01 +0100, Mikael Eriksson wrote:
>>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:54:35PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/The_QEMU_Accelerator_KQEMU_Module_is_Open_Source
>>
On 3/18/07, Mark Reitblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'm sorry that you're having this problem, but this is not the
> appropriate place to get help on this. Please file a bug against
> ndiswrapper: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ndiswrapper/+filebug
> . Feel free to email me the bug n
On 3/18/07, Mark Reitblatt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The problem you are describing sounds like a different bug than the one
> reported here. Please open another bug, and put all of that info in
> there. Feel free to let me know the number of the new bug report.
ok, it's bug 93566.
regards,
-
t u wrote:
> Mikael Eriksson wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 06:59:54PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
>>> On Sun, 2007-03-18 at 19:01 +0100, Mikael Eriksson wrote:
On Sun, Mar 18, 2007 at 03:54:35PM +, Alec Wright wrote:
> http://www.digg.com/linux_unix/The_QEMU_Accelerator_KQEMU_Module_
On 3/12/07, Mehdi Dogguy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I just want to know if it is planned to a gui to configure dual screens [1]
> like in other distros (like fedora) ?
> Because, for the moment, the operation is not so "user-friendly" and a lot
> of persons will appreciate to have th
24 matches
Mail list logo
