On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 5:28 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:27:02AM -0400, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
>> > (It's surprising that you apparently didn't see a dialog informing you
>> > that the installer had crashed. It must hav
On Tue, Jun 30, 2009 at 11:27:02AM -0400, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > (It's surprising that you apparently didn't see a dialog informing you
> > that the installer had crashed. It must have gone down pretty hard.)
>
> Yup. I had no idea that it
On Mon, Jun 29, 2009 at 8:39 PM, Colin Watson wrote:
> (It's surprising that you apparently didn't see a dialog informing you
> that the installer had crashed. It must have gone down pretty hard.)
Yup. I had no idea that it crashed until you just told me :) the same
thing occurred both times I ins
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 09:17:03PM -0400, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> Update: just did a fresh install, using karmic-desktop-amd64.iso.
>
> One more thing I just noticed is that after installation, it takes me
> to the live desktop screen. Any idea why it does this?
That only happens if the installer
On Sat, Jun 27, 2009 at 02:41:37PM -0400, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> > You shouldn't need a fresh install - just showing us the installation
> > logs from the one you have would be useful on its own.
>
> Erm, it looks like /var/log/installer does
Update: just did a fresh install, using karmic-desktop-amd64.iso.
One more thing I just noticed is that after installation, it takes me
to the live desktop screen. Any idea why it does this? It takes a
little bit of time to load the desktop, just so I can reboot.
Shouldn't it offer to reboot after
On Fri, Jun 26, 2009 at 1:51 AM, Colin Watson wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:44:11PM -0400, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Evan Dandrea wrote:
>> > No, I just tested this myself and was unable to reproduce the behavior
>> > you experienced. Are you sure the installa
On Tue, Jun 23, 2009 at 03:15:09PM +, Asif Youssuff wrote:
> I also saw this issue earlier today, after installing from the Karmic
> 64 LiveCD (used USB creator, so it was actually LiveUSB).
>
> Here's a bug report for the crashing in LiveCD phenomenon:
>
> https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 12:44:11PM -0400, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> > No, I just tested this myself and was unable to reproduce the behavior
> > you experienced. Are you sure the installation did not crash near the
> > end, and enough of the sys
I also saw this issue earlier today, after installing from the Karmic
64 LiveCD (used USB creator, so it was actually LiveUSB).
Here's a bug report for the crashing in LiveCD phenomenon:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/ubiquity/+bug/391162
-Asif
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 4:44 PM, Nathan
On Mon, Jun 22, 2009 at 5:18 AM, Evan Dandrea wrote:
> No, I just tested this myself and was unable to reproduce the behavior
> you experienced. Are you sure the installation did not crash near the
> end, and enough of the system was in place to allow you to boot? You
> would not have seen the "i
On Sun, Jun 21, 2009 at 11:41 PM, Nathan Dorfman wrote:
> Just installed karmic alpha 2, and noticed that a few packages that
> should have been removed at install are left behind.
>
> These include gparted, ubiquity, casper and a couple of others.
> Ubiquity's package description even states: Inst
Hi,
Just installed karmic alpha 2, and noticed that a few packages that
should have been removed at install are left behind.
These include gparted, ubiquity, casper and a couple of others.
Ubiquity's package description even states: Installing this package on
a normal system is unlikely to be use
13 matches
Mail list logo
