-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 09.01.2012 01:56, James Haigh wrote:
>
> * Super-a, Super-f (possibly others) no longer work. I use these
> frequently to go straight to the relevant part of Dash. One of the
> main features I preferred in Unity over Gnome 2 was the ability to
> st
On 06/01/2012, Evan Huus wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haigh
> wrote:
>> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
>> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
>
> I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the general
> majority o
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 06.01.2012 02:41, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Sorry for the stupid question:
>
> Are you really plan to release ubuntu 12.04 without gnome 3.4 in the
official repository?
>
> I mean, I can understand you prefere unity as default, but IMAO ubuntu
Dear Jeremy I know ubuntu takes "only" 3.2 kernel when 3.3 is out, but there is
a main differences between kernel and gnome:
the major kernel bugs are backported into the older releases, with a SRU in 3.2
release cycle, so you don't have to worry about updates.
In gnome things are quite differen
Though I think Unity still needs a -lot- of work, I find it much more
usable in Oneiric than it was in Natty. I used it for several months
before switching to Gnome 3 in Oneiric, whereas I couldn't stand it for a
day in Natty. (Keep up the good work.) I can't speak to whether there
have been reg
On 06/01/12 15:58, Evan Huus wrote:
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haigh wrote:
I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the general
majority opinion, a
On 6 January 2012 10:41, James Haigh wrote:
> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
>
> It has become a lot less usable, and a bit less elegant (Eg: Ubuntu
> start button thing). Some of the things that drew me to
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Fri, 6 Jan 2012 15:41:21 +
James Haigh wrote:
> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
>
> It has become a lot less usable, and a bit less elegant (Eg: Ubuntu
On 5 January 2012 20:41, Gianfranco Costamagna
wrote:
> Are you really plan to release ubuntu 12.04 without gnome 3.4 in the
> official repository?
>
> I mean, I can understand you prefere unity as default, but IMAO ubuntu
> should provide the latest gnome, like it provides the latest kernel relea
On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haigh wrote:
> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the general
majority opinion, as far as I can tell) is that the On
I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric,
Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty.
It has become a lot less usable, and a bit less elegant (Eg: Ubuntu
start button thing). Some of the things that drew me to Natty have
gone.
It's not the first time that upgradi
Hi Gianfranco,
These links should help you with that :
https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/desktop-p-gnome-version
http://www.omgubuntu.co.uk/2011/11/precisely-what-gnome-version-will-be-in-ubuntu-12-04/
Hope this helps,
Bilal Akhtar.
On Jan 5, 2012 8:42 PM, "Gianfranco Costamagna" <
Sorry for the stupid question:
Are you really plan to release ubuntu 12.04 without gnome 3.4 in the official
repository?
I mean, I can understand you prefere unity as default, but IMAO ubuntu should
provide the latest gnome, like it provides the latest kernel released in the
developing process
13 matches
Mail list logo
