Though I think Unity still needs a -lot- of work, I find it much more usable in Oneiric than it was in Natty. I used it for several months before switching to Gnome 3 in Oneiric, whereas I couldn't stand it for a day in Natty. (Keep up the good work.) I can't speak to whether there have been regressions, but I can speak to a marked improvement in overall usability.
--Dane On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 11:50 AM, Bruno Girin <brunogi...@gmail.com> wrote: > On 06/01/12 15:58, Evan Huus wrote: > >> On Fri, Jan 6, 2012 at 10:41 AM, James Haigh<james.r.ha...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> I was a keen Unity fan when Natty came out. However, since Oneiric, >>> Unity is the main reason why I'm still using Natty. >>> >> I find that very interesting. My personal opinion (and the general >> majority opinion, as far as I can tell) is that the Oneiric changes to >> unity were clear improvements. >> > > I second that: I installed Oneiric beta on my new laptop rather than Natty > because Unity in Natty was flaky with my hardware. > > Bruno > > > > -- > Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list > Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.**ubuntu.com<Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com> > Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/** > mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-**discuss<https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss> >
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
