-Original Message-
> hi,
> On Do, 2009-02-12 at 14:48 +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > I'd do something like:
>
> > - iterate /sys, looking for the devices
> > - track to their drivers (either by looking at what's loaded, or
> >comparing modalias to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE)
> isnt t
hi,
On Do, 2009-02-12 at 14:48 +, Scott James Remnant wrote:
> I'd do something like:
>
> - iterate /sys, looking for the devices
> - track to their drivers (either by looking at what's loaded, or
>comparing modalias to MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE)
isnt that what MODULES=dep in /etc/initramfs.co
Olá Scott e a todos.
On Thursday 12 February 2009 14:48:11 Scott James Remnant wrote:
> On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:15 +, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> > Hope I dont start a flame war here, but is there any *easy* way for
> > non-devel-but-somewhat-advanced-users to pick the _current_ installe
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 11:15 +, (``-_-´´) -- BUGabundo wrote:
> On Thursday 12 February 2009 00:17:51 Scott James Remnant wrote:
> > This is most likely simply a difference between *your* 2.6.29 config and
> > the Ubuntu 2.6.28 one - I expect you compiled in many of the drivers
> > your compute
Olá Scott e a todos.
On Thursday 12 February 2009 00:17:51 Scott James Remnant wrote:
> This is most likely simply a difference between *your* 2.6.29 config and
> the Ubuntu 2.6.28 one - I expect you compiled in many of the drivers
> your computer needed, and omitted those you didn't
Hope I dont
> This is most likely simply a difference between *your* 2.6.29 config and
> the Ubuntu 2.6.28 one - I expect you compiled in many of the drivers
> your computer needed, and omitted those you didn't
>
> If you used our config, and just tweaked where necessary, I'd be very
> interested to see compar
Null Ack [2009-02-12 4:06 +1100]:
> As do I Scott, but I am careful to distinguish between features and
> fixes. I'd like to know if .29 fixes will be backported into Ubuntu's
> .28 and how the thing will be managed.
They are, and there will be more. E. g. look at 2.6.28-7.18 at
https://launchpad
On Wed, Feb 11, 2009 at 5:37 PM, Null Ack wrote:
> Can I please be advised of why Jaunty will not ship with 2.6.29, and
> that the kernel team has elected to ship on .28?
>
Here is a (short) explanation:
http://blog.redvoodoo.org/2009/02/jaunty-kernel-bits.html
Pretty much the same as what has
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 18:45 +, Andy Rogers wrote:
> I have been using the 2.6.29-RC3 Kernel with Januty and found my bootup
> time was approx 5 seconds quicker then 2.6.28 Kernel at the time, and
> found no issues at the moment.
>
This is most likely simply a difference between *your* 2.6.29
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 08:16:16AM EST, Dan Chen wrote:
> 2.6.29 brings a newer alsa-kernel bump with a corresponding requisite
> userspace alsa-lib bump, which is not quite wise given testing time
> constraints.
>
> The above example is but one thing to consider. While you are always Free to
>
On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 05:45:10AM EST, Andy Rogers wrote:
> What other goods reasons are there that we can throw in the pot and put
> pressue on the developers to consider using this Kernel.
>
> There is still over 2 1/2 months to got approx before Jaunty is officially
> released.
There may be a
2.6.29 brings a newer alsa-kernel bump with a corresponding requisite userspace
alsa-lib bump, which is not quite wise given testing time constraints.
The above example is but one thing to consider. While you are always Free to
use your own kernel, if you do, you should be cognizant of the poten
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:45:10 - (UTC) "Andy Rogers"
wrote:
>>I think that the main reason is time releases of Ubuntu, there is not
>enough time to wait for 2.6.29, test, a fix bugs.
>
>
>Hi All
>
>Iam new to this kind of discussion thing, only been using Ubuntu for
>around 9 months and loving
On Wed, 2009-02-11 at 18:45 +, Andy Rogers wrote:
> >I think that the main reason is time releases of Ubuntu, there is not
> enough time to wait for 2.6.29, test, a fix bugs.
>
>
> Hi All
>
> Iam new to this kind of discussion thing, only been using Ubuntu for
> around 9 months and loving it
>I think that the main reason is time releases of Ubuntu, there is not
enough time to wait for 2.6.29, test, a fix bugs.
Hi All
Iam new to this kind of discussion thing, only been using Ubuntu for
around 9 months and loving it. Not really looked back, and only using
Windows for odd things every
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:04:30 +0100 Surfaz Gemon Meme
wrote:
>>>I think that the main reason is time releases of Ubuntu, there is not
>>>enough time to wait for 2.6.29, test, a fix bugs.
>>
>> If that's the case, I applaud the kernel team's decision to be less
forward
>> leaning this time arounf.
On Thu, 2009-02-12 at 04:06 +1100, Null Ack wrote:
> As do I Scott, but I am careful to distinguish between features and
> fixes. I'd like to know if .29 fixes will be backported into Ubuntu's
> .28 and how the thing will be managed.
It is standard practice for the kernel team to cherry-pick patch
As do I Scott, but I am careful to distinguish between features and
fixes. I'd like to know if .29 fixes will be backported into Ubuntu's
.28 and how the thing will be managed.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://l
>>I think that the main reason is time releases of Ubuntu, there is not
>>enough time to wait for 2.6.29, test, a fix bugs.
>
> If that's the case, I applaud the kernel team's decision to be less forward
> leaning this time arounf.
Sorry, I don't understand you. What I said was only a theory, I do
On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 17:43:35 +0100 Surfaz Gemon Meme
wrote:
>2009/2/11 Null Ack
>>
>> Can I please be advised of why Jaunty will not ship with 2.6.29, and
>> that the kernel team has elected to ship on .28?
>
>I think that the main reason is time releases of Ubuntu, there is not
>enough time to
2009/2/11 Null Ack
>
> Can I please be advised of why Jaunty will not ship with 2.6.29, and
> that the kernel team has elected to ship on .28?
I think that the main reason is time releases of Ubuntu, there is not
enough time to wait for 2.6.29, test, a fix bugs.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing
Can I please be advised of why Jaunty will not ship with 2.6.29, and
that the kernel team has elected to ship on .28?
I'm sure the kernel team are aware of the many driver changes in .29,
but I'm not clear if they they propose to backport those into .28?
What about features? Or any patches that fo
22 matches
Mail list logo
