On Wed, 11 Feb 2009 18:45:10 -0000 (UTC) "Andy Rogers" <ubu...@andyscomp.f9.co.uk> wrote: >>I think that the main reason is time releases of Ubuntu, there is not >enough time to wait for 2.6.29, test, a fix bugs. > > >Hi All > >Iam new to this kind of discussion thing, only been using Ubuntu for >around 9 months and loving it. Not really looked back, and only using >Windows for odd things every other month now. > >Well my opinion on this was that regarding the time frame didn't 2.6.27 >get slipped in at the last minute around Late August/Early September time >for Intrepid and that did not cause any problems. > >I have been using the 2.6.29-RC3 Kernel with Januty and found my bootup >time was approx 5 seconds quicker then 2.6.28 Kernel at the time, and >found no issues at the moment. > >What other goods reasons are there that we can throw in the pot and put >pressue on the developers to consider using this Kernel. > >There is still over 2 1/2 months to got approx before Jaunty is officially >released. > You've had a very different 2.6.27 experience than I have then. Two of the three machines I have running Intrepid here has kernel/firmware realted issues that are regressions from Hardy.
All of these experiences tend to be somewhat hardware specific, so everyone will see it differently. Scott K -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
