On Monday 17 September 2007 06:11:01 Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Murat Gunes wrote:
> > You may want to file a bug in the ubuntu-cdimage product at Launchpad if
> > you feel the warning should be in some other form and/or made more explicit.
>
> Fair enough. Done: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu-cd
Bryce <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That really does not make any sense if thats the case. What is the
> point in making daily images available for testing if know one is
> going to be able to use them?
You can always burn them on a DVD, or use it in a VM like qemu or
vmware.
--
Gruesse/greeti
On Mon, 2007-09-17 at 07:37 +0300, Murat Gunes wrote:
> Not many daily images end up oversized. If it were a substantial
> percentage of all images, you'd have a point. With the current state of
> things, people can wait a day, or two at worst, or use the image from a
> day or two before (I think
Hi,
Scott Ritchie [2007-09-16 20:57 -0700]:
> The latest nightly ISO for AMD64 is too large to burn - even with
> overburning enabled. The end result is that I can't test it.
>
> Is this a simple bug, or are nightly images allowed to get too large?
> Did something large creep in recently?
They
Murat Gunes wrote:
> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> In this case it didn't - I didn't even come across a warning.
>
> In http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20070914/ I can clearly see that
> there are two files that end with .OVERSIZED; I guess the capitalization
> is to draw attention to the fact.
Scott Ritchie wrote:
> In this case it didn't - I didn't even come across a warning.
In http://cdimage.ubuntu.com/daily-live/20070914/ I can clearly see that
there are two files that end with .OVERSIZED; I guess the capitalization
is to draw attention to the fact. You could also check for the
Murat Gunes wrote:
> Bryce wrote:
>> That really does not make any sense if thats the case. What is the
>> point in making daily images available for testing if know one is going
>> to be able to use them?
>
> Not many daily images end up oversized. If it were a substantial
> percentage of all
Scott Ritchie wrote:
> Perhaps the build script should throw up a warning somewhere. Otherwise
> there's almost no point to having them.
Also note that when testing in a VM, the images can be used regardless
of the size.
m.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubunt
Bryce wrote:
> That really does not make any sense if thats the case. What is the
> point in making daily images available for testing if know one is going
> to be able to use them?
Not many daily images end up oversized. If it were a substantial
percentage of all images, you'd have a point. W
That really does not make any sense if thats the case. What is the point in
making daily images available for testing if know one is going to be able to
use them?
On 9/17/07, Murat Gunes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Scott Ritchie wrote:
> > The latest nightly ISO for AMD64 is too large to burn
Murat Gunes wrote:
> Scott Ritchie wrote:
>> The latest nightly ISO for AMD64 is too large to burn - even with
>> overburning enabled. The end result is that I can't test it.
>>
>> Is this a simple bug, or are nightly images allowed to get too large?
>> Did something large creep in recently?
>>
>>
Scott Ritchie wrote:
> The latest nightly ISO for AMD64 is too large to burn - even with
> overburning enabled. The end result is that I can't test it.
>
> Is this a simple bug, or are nightly images allowed to get too large?
> Did something large creep in recently?
>
> Either way, it seems like
12 matches
Mail list logo
