Murat Gunes wrote: > Bryce wrote: >> That really does not make any sense if thats the case. What is the >> point in making daily images available for testing if know one is going >> to be able to use them? > > Not many daily images end up oversized. If it were a substantial > percentage of all images, you'd have a point. With the current state of > things, people can wait a day, or two at worst, or use the image from a > day or two before (I think jidgo is not an option with the live CDs, but > should be usable with the alternate CD; I'd be happy if someone could > confirm this). It's not realistic to expect all uploads to be concerted > to such an extent as to be able to meet a certain maximum size on a > daily basis. > > Scott Ritchie wrote: >> Perhaps the build script should throw up a warning somewhere. Otherwise >> there's almost no point to having them. > > I think it creates files that end with .OVERSIZED corresponding to the > image that ends up being oversized. > > m. > >
In this case it didn't - I didn't even come across a warning. Honestly it would be best if no image was made, rather than an unburnable one. Nothing wrong with skipping a few days when the nightly isn't buildable. Thanks, Scott Ritchie -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
