Robbie Williamson wrote:
> This was suggested by some of the platform leads. Some partners not familiar
> with our release process assume that FeatureFreeze is the deadline by which
> they
> can submit their code *for the first time*...that is, they have not made *any*
> public drops to us or anyo
Hello Robbie,
Robbie Williamson [2009-03-04 9:24 -0600]:
> This was suggested by some of the platform leads. Some partners not familiar
> with our release process assume that FeatureFreeze is the deadline by which
> they
> can submit their code *for the first time*...that is, they have not made
On 03/04/2009 09:59 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:46:43 -0600 Robbie Williamson
> wrote:
>> On 03/04/2009 09:28 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>>> On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:24:10 -0600 Robbie Williamson
>>> wrote:
On 03/04/2009 02:42 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Scott Kitter
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:46:43 -0600 Robbie Williamson
wrote:
>On 03/04/2009 09:28 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
>> On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:24:10 -0600 Robbie Williamson
>> wrote:
>>> On 03/04/2009 02:42 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
Scott Kitterman [2009-03-03 16:04 -0500]:
> Could we have some di
On 03/04/2009 09:28 AM, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:24:10 -0600 Robbie Williamson
> wrote:
>> On 03/04/2009 02:42 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>>> Scott Kitterman [2009-03-03 16:04 -0500]:
Could we have some discussion about cutting two weeks off of getting
> new
package
On Wed, 04 Mar 2009 09:24:10 -0600 Robbie Williamson
wrote:
>On 03/04/2009 02:42 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
>> Scott Kitterman [2009-03-03 16:04 -0500]:
>>> Could we have some discussion about cutting two weeks off of getting
new
>>> packages in? I'd like to understand why it was moved back and wh
On 03/04/2009 02:42 AM, Martin Pitt wrote:
> Scott Kitterman [2009-03-03 16:04 -0500]:
>> Could we have some discussion about cutting two weeks off of getting new
>> packages in? I'd like to understand why it was moved back and what problem
>> we are trying to solve. Was there some discussion a
Scott Kitterman [2009-03-03 16:04 -0500]:
> Could we have some discussion about cutting two weeks off of getting new
> packages in? I'd like to understand why it was moved back and what problem
> we are trying to solve. Was there some discussion already of adding an
> earlier "NewPackageUpload
On 03/03/2009, at 22.04, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> Could we have some discussion about cutting two weeks off of getting
> new
> packages in? I'd like to understand why it was moved back and what
> problem
> we are trying to solve. Was there some discussion already of adding
> an
> earlier
On Mon, 02 Mar 2009 13:51:20 -0600 Robbie Williamson
wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>The release schedule for Karmic is now available at
>https://wiki.ubuntu.com/KarmicReleaseSchedule. Over the next couple
months, we
>will be hard at work getting Jaunty ready for release in April. However,
you
>can expect
10 matches
Mail list logo
