On Thu, May 03, 2007 at 12:43:07AM -0400, Michael R. Head wrote:
> This appears to be resolved, with standard source and debdiff links for
> each release of the packages. (I don't know when this happened, but when
> I visited the site today, I noticed that the change had been made).
Indeed, this
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 17:13 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:45:12PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
>
> > I'd never heard of it until now. I'm CCing the MOTU Council, who I hope can
> > provide a channel to begin a conversation with them.
>
> At the moment, there's no sou
On Mon, Mar 05, 2007 at 03:45:12PM -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> I'd never heard of it until now. I'm CCing the MOTU Council, who I hope can
> provide a channel to begin a conversation with them.
At the moment, there's no source available with the downloads. The site
maintainer has indicated t
On Mon, 2007-03-05 at 15:45 -0800, Matt Zimmerman wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:16:44PM -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
> > I just came across www.getdeb.net today. The goals appear to be similar
> > to those of the backports project (to provide the latest versions of
> > desktop apps for previ
On Sat, Mar 03, 2007 at 01:16:44PM -0500, Michael R. Head wrote:
> I just came across www.getdeb.net today. The goals appear to be similar
> to those of the backports project (to provide the latest versions of
> desktop apps for previously released versions of Ubuntu).
>
> However, they also have
Michael R. Head a écrit :
> Hi,
>
> I just came across www.getdeb.net today. The goals appear to be similar
> to those of the backports project (to provide the latest versions of
> desktop apps for previously released versions of Ubuntu).
>
> However, they also have a number of packages availabl
