Re: linux kernel version 5.15.0-69

hi, Am Samstag, dem 01.04.2023 um 12:47 +0200 schrieb harald.font...@gmx.net: > Do you recommend upgrading the kernel manually? it does not ask you to "upgrade the kernel manually" it just tells you that the upgrade happened but the kernel will only be able to be used after a reboot of the machin

linux kernel version 5.15.0-69

Dear all, I am new to managing servers – I “rented” a Linux Server from IONOS that I have to manage it myself. While installing some packages I got this warning: I ran “sudo apt-get dist-upgrade” but it didn’t do any upgrades. I am on Ubuntu 22.04.2 LTS and extended security upgrade

Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

n a >courtroom nor do I personally have any code in the linux kernel. It's not my domain, but seemingly Ubuntu provides AppArmor and no GRSecurity at all. However, the problem with this person aren't the concerns. It's the tone of voice and that there isn't an evidence for a

Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

>>> argue and swear it's fine till hell freezes over and get very angry > >>> when > >>> someone with a legal background informs them otherwise. > >>> > >>> I think many people are not aware of the violation because it's onl

Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

I'm listening to your responses, and responding myself. You call me a spammer. Which is a libel. Would you like me to file over it? On 2017-06-15 16:05, Wade Smart wrote: Whoever this person is, not only is s/he spamming multiple lists here, there are several over lists where Im getting the s

Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

urity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? Why does no one care that Brad Spengler (seemingly aswell as PaxTeam) of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? Why does no one care that Brad Spengl

Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

ecurity pulled the sourcecode: it was almost a moot point before then with no real damage. Such is no-longer the case. On 2017-06-15 15:43, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:34:06PM +, aconcernedfoss...@airmail.cc wrote: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is b

Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

a joint action. On 2017-06-15 15:58, Rik van Riel wrote: On Thu, 2017-06-15 at 15:34 +, aconcernedfoss...@airmail.cc wrote: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly  violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? He is also violating the license gra

Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

If Mr Spengler would like to market a non-re-distributable hardened kernel, he can write his own kernel from scratch. Currently he is marketing a non-redistributable derivative work of the Linux Kernel. He prevents customers of his from redistributing the derivative work by threatening a non

Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

GRSecurity is such a non-standalone derivative work, so the Linux Licensing terms absolutely do apply (it's a patch that snakes through the whole of the Linux Kernel source tree, touching everything like a vine). Here's a quick rundown: - GRSecurity

Re: [kernel-hardening] Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

it was almost a moot point before then with no real damage. Such is no-longer the case. On 2017-06-15 15:43, Greg KH wrote: On Thu, Jun 15, 2017 at 03:34:06PM +, aconcernedfoss...@airmail.cc wrote: Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of t

Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel?

Why does no one care that Brad Spengler of GRSecurity is blatantly violating the intention of the rightsholders to the Linux Kernel? He is also violating the license grant, Courts would not be fooled by his scheme to prevent redistribution. The license grant the Linux Kernel is distributed

ABI changes analysis for the Linux kernel

Hello, This is a tracker of ABI changes in the new upstream releases of the Linux kernel (defconfig, x86_64): https://abi-laboratory.pro/tracker/timeline/linux/ The tracker performs backward binary compatibility analysis of all public exported symbols and data types (declared in the ".ks

re: bcmwl-kernel-source and linux kernel 4.7

it looks like IEEE80211_BAND_2GHZ/IEEE80211_BAND_5GHZ, has been renamed to NL80211_BAND_2GHZ/NL80211_BAND_5GHZ i have tested the below patch on my machine, and i am able to successfully build, and use, my wireless adapter with it diff --git a/src/wl/sys/wl_cfg80211_hybrid.c b/src/wl/sys/wl_cfg8

Re: GRSecurity Closes Stable Patch of Linux Kernel, Your opinion?

Hi, there were already discussions about violations of the GPL on Linux audio lists, but I have forgotten if it's allowed to provide the source to customers only. IMO it doesn't matter what's allowed and what isn't allowed, there's an ethical commitment to keep source code open. Another issue is t

GRSecurity Closes Stable Patch of Linux Kernel, Your opinion?

patches, which are wholely derivative works of the linux kernel, have been brought closed. This is how to "un-GPL" a work, 101. That is what has happened, effectivly: they got around your intent that derivative works be open, like the linux kernel, except this time they are not even di

Major Page Fault Handler in the Linux Kernel

Hi Dear Ubuntu developers and kernel hackers, I am wondering where is the major page fault handler. I wrote an algorithm to minimize page faults in the kernel. So I need to record something whenever a page fault happens. I currently record a page fault happen at do_page_fault(...) in arch/x86/mm/

Re: Linux Kernel

On Fri, Jun 4, 2010 at 5:05 AM, Volovikov Taras wrote: > Which version of the kernel you plan to include in Ubuntu 10.10? > I believe that if you want to use btrfs, the better it will be 2.6.35 or > later. https://lists.ubuntu.com/archives/ubuntu-devel/2010-May/030764.html -- Ubuntu-devel-discu

Linux Kernel

Which version of the kernel you plan to include in Ubuntu 10.10? I believe that if you want to use btrfs, the better it will be 2.6.35 or later. -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinf

Re: Linux kernel debug information missing from Intrepid

Hi, On Friday 31 October 2008 21.55.39 Martin Pitt wrote: > In Intrepid it is now marked as a "debug symbol" package and lands at > > http://ddebs.ubuntu.com/pool/main/l/linux/ The packages is not installable using APT as they are missing from the ddebs repository Packages file. Also the meta-

Re: Linux kernel debug information missing from Intrepid

Hi Stefano, Stefano Doni [2008-10-29 20:27 +0100]: >first of let me congratulate on the Intrepid release, you made a great > work, as usual! Thanks! > I would like to bring to your attention though that Intrepid seems to lack > the linux-image-debug package. This is needed in order to use t

Linux kernel debug information missing from Intrepid

Hello guys, first of let me congratulate on the Intrepid release, you made a great work, as usual! I would like to bring to your attention though that Intrepid seems to lack the linux-image-debug package. This is needed in order to use the Systemtap utility. I've filed a bug here: https://bug

Re: Upgrading Hardy Heron 8.04 Beta to Linux kernel .16 breaks it; it won't boot.

Olá Jim. On Wednesday 16 April 2008 13:53:28 Jim and Judi Harris wrote: > Please also send a URL describing how to "change your grub boot options to > remove the splash so you can see the errors etc. better", as I see no such > help anywhere, including in the GRUB Manual at > > > > > > Sincerely,

Re: Upgrading Hardy Heron 8.04 Beta to Linux kernel .16 breaks it; it won't boot.

Am 16.04.2008 um 14:53 schrieb Jim and Judi Harris: > ubuntu-users - > Ubuntu user technical support, not for general discussions > > and my Ubuntu is the free version so I am not under a "user technical > support" agreement? Your Ubuntu is

Re: Upgrading Hardy Heron 8.04 Beta to Linux kernel .16 breaks it; it won't boot.

On Wed, Apr 16, 2008 at 8:53 AM, Jim and Judi Harris <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Thanks to Todd and Henrik. No, Henrik, I don't have a TV card; there is > nothing but a GeForce 2 video card added to the mobo. > > Todd, how can I run any of what you say if it won't boot? Do I do all that > work

Re: Upgrading Hardy Heron 8.04 Beta to Linux kernel .16 breaks it; it won't boot.

Thanks to Todd and Henrik. No, Henrik, I don't have a TV card; there is nothing but a GeForce 2 video card added to the mobo. Todd, how can I run any of what you say if it won't boot? Do I do all that work on the older version? What about the startup/boot log that I presume is generated during the

Re: Upgrading Hardy Heron 8.04 Beta to Linux kernel .16 breaks it; it won't boot.

Hi, Do you have a TV card? I have a TV card and i think this is why it fails. If you try to boot one of the newer kernels 15 or 16 in recovery mode you may see some hints about it being the TV card. I get a full stop right after some messages about Hauppauge and modprobe exiting abnormally. I do

Re: Upgrading Hardy Heron 8.04 Beta to Linux kernel .16 breaks it; it won't boot.

@lists.ubuntu.com Sent: Tue, 15 Apr 2008 12:01:20 -0600 Subject: Upgrading Hardy Heron 8.04 Beta to Linux kernel .16 breaks it; it won't boot. Hi. This is my first post to this kind of list. I'm not a Linux newbie but close to it. I've been using Ubuntu for the last few years (

Re: Upgrading Hardy Heron 8.04 Beta to Linux kernel .16 breaks it; it won't boot.

Hi Jim, This is something that I would recommend report a bug on at: https://launchpad.net/ubuntu >From your description it sounds like it is a kernel problem, so look for the appropriate linux package. Make sure you have the latest available and then you should provide some more information in

Upgrading Hardy Heron 8.04 Beta to Linux kernel .16 breaks it; it won't boot.

Hi. This is my first post to this kind of list. I'm not a Linux newbie but close to it. I've been using Ubuntu for the last few years (and tried a few other versions before that), but mostly as a "Typical Windows User", where I focus mostly on using the applications, not the OS. Anyway, perhaps bec

Re: URGENT !!! : [USN-464-1] Linux kernel vulnerabilities

On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 11:22:30PM +0200, Thilo Six wrote: > Matt Zimmerman wrote the following on 27.05.2007 22:48 > > >> now i > >> $ aptitude install linux-image-2.6.20-16-generic > >> > >> and now nvidia is broken !! > > > > You installed the new kernel, but forgot to install the correspondin

Re: URGENT !!! : [USN-464-1] Linux kernel vulnerabilities

Matt Zimmerman wrote the following on 27.05.2007 22:48 >> now i >> $ aptitude install linux-image-2.6.20-16-generic >> >> and now nvidia is broken !! > > You installed the new kernel, but forgot to install the corresponding > restricted-modules package. sorry if i exaggerated a bit but i got thi

Re: URGENT !!! : [USN-464-1] Linux kernel vulnerabilities

On Sun, May 27, 2007 at 10:31:37AM +0200, Thilo Six wrote: > now i > $ aptitude install linux-image-2.6.20-16-generic > > and now nvidia is broken !! You installed the new kernel, but forgot to install the corresponding restricted-modules package. -- - mdz -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing lis

Re: [USN-464-1] Linux kernel vulnerabilities

On Sat, May 26, 2007 at 11:27:45PM +0200, Thilo Six wrote: > Hello > > The kernel security update [USN-464-1] is missing s.th. This is known to the security team, and being worked on. -- - mdz -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsub

Re: URGENT !!! : [USN-464-1] Linux kernel vulnerabilities

Thilo Six wrote the following on 27.05.2007 10:31 > Thilo Six wrote the following on 26.05.2007 23:27 >> Hello >> >> The kernel security update [USN-464-1] is missing s.th. >> >> $ sudo aptitude show linux-generic | grep depend >> Depends: linux-image-generic, linux-restricted-modules-generic >> >>

URGENT !!! : [USN-464-1] Linux kernel vulnerabilities

Thilo Six wrote the following on 26.05.2007 23:27 > Hello > > The kernel security update [USN-464-1] is missing s.th. > > $ sudo aptitude show linux-generic | grep depend > Depends: linux-image-generic, linux-restricted-modules-generic > > $ sudo aptitude show linux-image-generic | grep depen > Dep

Re: [USN-464-1] Linux kernel vulnerabilities

Hello The kernel security update [USN-464-1] is missing s.th. $ sudo aptitude show linux-generic | grep depend Depends: linux-image-generic, linux-restricted-modules-generic $ sudo aptitude show linux-image-generic | grep depen Depends: linux-image-2.6.20-15-generic ^