On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 9:49 PM, Jan Claeys wrote:
> Op dinsdag 28-04-2009 om 22:09 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Marius
> Gedminas:
> > Why is it a bug? According to Matthew Garrett, to save power, you
> > want to finish executing a task as soon as possible, which means
> > running for a shorte
Op dinsdag 28-04-2009 om 22:09 uur [tijdzone +0300], schreef Marius
Gedminas:
> Why is it a bug? According to Matthew Garrett, to save power, you
> want to finish executing a task as soon as possible, which means
> running for a shorter time at 100% speed.
That won't save power for an application
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 3:09 PM, Marius Gedminas wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:18:42PM -0400, Evan wrote:
> > I just updated to from Intrepid to Jaunty, and I noticed something
> curious.
> > I believe this is a bug, but even if it isn't, I thought it should be
> > raised.
> >
> > If a cpu
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:18:42PM -0400, Evan wrote:
> I just updated to from Intrepid to Jaunty, and I noticed something curious.
> I believe this is a bug, but even if it isn't, I thought it should be
> raised.
>
> If a cpu (or core) is set to "Ondemand" and an application with a high nice
> va
Reposting to full list. Sorry Felipe.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:05 PM, Felipe Figueiredo wrote:
> Evan wrote:
> > I just updated to from Intrepid to Jaunty, and I noticed something
> > curious. I believe this is a bug, but even if it isn't, I thought it
> > should be raised.
> >
> > If a cpu (or c
I just updated to from Intrepid to Jaunty, and I noticed something curious.
I believe this is a bug, but even if it isn't, I thought it should be
raised.
If a cpu (or core) is set to "Ondemand" and an application with a high nice
value is running:
- In intrepid, the cpu remained scaled down
- In j
