RE: "tree" package to be included out-of-the-box

2009-11-20 Thread Ethan Baldridge
s.ubuntu.com [mailto:ubuntu- > devel-discuss-boun...@lists.ubuntu.com] On Behalf Of Daniel Robitaille > Sent: Friday, November 20, 2009 8:05 PM > To: ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com > Subject: Re: "tree" package to be included out-of-the-box > > On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6

Re: "tree" package to be included out-of-the-box

2009-11-20 Thread Daniel Robitaille
On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Chris Jones wrote: > Ok, this is really starting to bug me. Why is the "tree" package not > installed by default in Ubuntu? Other distros such as Fedora have it > installed by default. > > I know it's easy enough to install at only ~500kb, but it irks me as > it's

"tree" package to be included out-of-the-box

2009-11-20 Thread Chris Jones
Ok, this is really starting to bug me. Why is the "tree" package not installed by default in Ubuntu? Other distros such as Fedora have it installed by default. I know it's easy enough to install at only ~500kb, but it irks me as it's a command I use all the time and I think it is just something/a