On Fri, Nov 20, 2009 at 6:27 PM, Chris Jones <chrisjo...@comcen.com.au> wrote: > Ok, this is really starting to bug me. Why is the "tree" package not > installed by default in Ubuntu? Other distros such as Fedora have it > installed by default. > > I know it's easy enough to install at only ~500kb, but it irks me as > it's a command I use all the time and I think it is just something/a > command that should be included without the user having to install it. > > Cheers.
I think we all have our personal pet packages we would like to have installed by default, and all our answers would be a bit different from each other. Mine are "flip" and "vim" (instead of the default vim-tiny...). There is just so much space available to whatever become the Ubuntu default, and every kb counts; and it's not like the extra few seconds to install them in the few cases during the year I setup a system totally from scratch will kill me. -- Daniel Robitaille -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
