ing a bluetooth mouse (kudos to
the bluez devs!).
My experience with the system-config-printer folks was also very
gratifying. And the work on xserver-xorg-video-intel has not gone
unnoticed on my machine. Many many thanks to you all!
- Andrew Jorgensen
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-
Would it make sense to promote nspluginwrapper [0] to main for amd64?
openSUSE will be including it in 10.3[1]. It seems a better solution
user-wise than including the still-alpha gnash.
[0] http://gwenole.beauchesne.info/projects/nspluginwrapper/
[1]
http://en.opensuse.org/Factory/News#Changes_
So did you get it working?
On 6/8/07, Johannes Kastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You'll need to install vnc4-common, which you'll also need to use to
> > create the vnc passwd file.
>
> If I need it for vnc4server to work, why is it not installed
> automatically when I install vnc4server?
>Fro
On 6/7/07, Johannes Kastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > You can se a sample file in /usr/share/vnc4-common/examples/
>
> No. I have no directory named /usr/share/vnc4-common/. I only got
> /usr/share/doc/vnc4server and /usr/share/doc/vnc-common, but none of
> them contains a examples-directory.
Y
On 6/7/07, Johannes Kastl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On openSuse 10.2 one can get access to the x-server with vnc, which is
> handled directly in the xorg.conf. Seems to be in the package
> xorg-x11-Xvnc-7.1-33.3.
In Ubuntu this is in the vnc4server (universe) package, the file is
/usr/lib/xorg/
On 3/14/07, Conrad Knauer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, what concerns me is that once you enable Remote Desktop there is
> no Notification Area icon indicating that its active and so it can
> easily be forgotten about.
There is in Feisty.
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-dis
I always install gnome-backgrounds. There are actually quite a few
GPL (not sure how that applies to photos, but whatever) packages of
excellent backgrounds. Not many are included in the Ubuntu
repositories though.
OpenSuSE has a few I like that can be had from this source rpm
(file-roller shoul
If I understand correctly they're reluctant to move to a new gparted
because of the integration with the installer. There are some
compelling bugs in 0.2.5 though.
On 2/12/07, Jan Claeys <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It seems like Feisty still only has GParted 0.2.5, while 0.3.3 should
> fix all k
> I would like to ask the devels not to include Flash 9 in our
> repositories... It is too damn buggy, and it's not worth the bad PR
> Feisty might get with crashing Firefoxes...
Since it's not included in main, or even restricted, it's not going to
change much to remove it from the repositories.
On 1/3/07, Joel Bryan Juliano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The Gnome HAL Device manager was showing too much "Unknown" entries, which
> is not very helpful for users.
> (optimistic users that is :-), pessimist love it)
>
> I think it should be better if it should hide the entries with Unknown
> str
On 12/28/06, Wes Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Eric and Rob's point there was that whichever 64-bit desktop takes the
> crown, one of the reasons will be because it had 64-bit drivers for all the
> existing hardware out there. Linux actually has an advantage over Windows in
> this regard sinc
> Here are the "what it will take win" points from the essay:
>
> 1. Drivers for all major existing hardware.
> ...
Unfortunately what we need is not drivers for all major existing
hardware but drivers for all major hardware soon to exist. We're
always one step behind (or several) in this
;? What standard?
>
>
> Joel Bryan Juliano wrote:
> On 12/22/06, Andrew Jorgensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On 12/21/06, Joel Bryan Juliano <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > All Ubuntu applications should create directories that it needs, when it
&
On 12/20/06, Ernst Persson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because it's buggy and unmaintained I guess? It was a very old version.
There are a good number of bugs logged against it in launchpad (some
of them are dups, I'll se if I can clean some up today) but it's not
unmaintained or old. A new vers
The old zeroconf package (I know we're using avahi-autoipd) would
setup a zeroconf address on an interface in addition to any configured
or dhcp address. This worked fine for me. If I understand correctly
the current approach is to configure a link-local address only if no
static address was give
I see this in the changelog but no explanation why. I found it very
useful and extremely simple. Why was it removed?
--
Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list
Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com
Modify settings or unsubscribe at:
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
16 matches
Mail list logo
