On 02/06/2017 03:43 AM, Gianfranco Costamagna wrote:
> Hello Ubuntu Security Team,
>
>> tcpdump (4.7.4-1ubuntu1) wily; urgency=low
>> -- Gianfranco Costamagna Fri, 29 May
>> 2015 20:13:33 +0200
>
> since this happen to be me doing the merges...
> lets do this:
>
> apparently Debian used 4.9.
Hello Ubuntu Security Team,
> tcpdump (4.7.4-1ubuntu1) wily; urgency=low
> -- Gianfranco Costamagna Fri, 29 May
> 2015 20:13:33 +0200
since this happen to be me doing the merges...
lets do this:
apparently Debian used 4.9.0 to stable-release update tcpdump.
They might have their good reasons
Hello Ubuntu Security Team,
> tcpdump (4.7.4-1ubuntu1) wily; urgency=low
> -- Gianfranco Costamagna Fri, 29 May
> 2015 20:13:33 +0200
since this happen to be me doing the merges...
lets do this:
apparently Debian used 4.9.0 to stable-release update tcpdump.
They might have their good reasons
The vulnerabilities can be found here:
https://isc.sans.edu/forums/diary/Multiple+Vulnerabilities+in+tcpdump/22017/
When it comes to the backport updates, how can I tell if backport has
updated the specific software I need updated?
On Sat, Feb 4, 2017 at 5:16 AM, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Fri, Fe
