user-mode-linux in precise

2012-01-29 Thread Ritesh Raj Sarraf
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA512 Hello, There seems to be no user-mode-linux for Precise. Is this intentional? - -- Given the large number of mailing lists I follow, I request you to CC me in replies for quicker response -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.17 (GNU/L

Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files) (imaginative solution/description presented)?

2012-01-29 Thread HSO
2012/1/30, HSO : > Firewall "in to" Network Manager & > NetHogs allgo. form source code "in to" System Monitor, code > > For me - Cool :-) > > Firewall - iptables + Some of part of code fwbuilder can be use ? > > > > -- > > "powiedz mi, a zapomnę, pokaż -- a zapamiętam, pozwól mi działać, a > zroz

Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files) (imaginative solution/description presented)?

2012-01-29 Thread Matthew Paul Thomas
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Robbie Williamson wrote on 29/01/12 21:39: > > On 01/26/2012 11:12 PM, nick rundy wrote: ... >> >> Just to be clear, I'm not asking that an application-firewall >> (as Jason Todd was speaking of) be created to solve this problem. >> I'm totally fine

Re: can we find a solution to bug #820895 (show Process Name in log files) (imaginative solution/description presented)?

2012-01-29 Thread Robbie Williamson
Sounds like nethogs can solve the problem of knowing which processes are currently sucking down bandwidth. As for your indicator idea, I think a simple GUI front-end to nethogs would be the first step. The application could reside with other system apps, and simply be fired up when a user wants t