Hi,
I've run IPv6 on my local network and through a IPv6inIPv4 tunnel for a
while. Here's what I would bring up if I were at UDS on the subject of IPv6 on
Ubuntu:
o One thing I just discovered is that a maverick VM that only has an IPv6 only
connection (and even an IPv6 mirror or apt packag
Mathieu Trudel-Lapierre schreef op za 30-04-2011 om 14:18 [-0400]:
> Well, I didn't mention this precisely because the mirrors and other
> services aren't IPv6 ready,
Some mirrors are IPv6-ready, e.g. the ones operated by BIT
(nl.archive.ubuntu.com aka ubuntuarchive.bit.nl), BelNet (ftp.belnet.be
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 08:24, Chris Jones wrote:
> I'm actually gonna go against the grain and say that I reckon the release of
> Ubuntu 11.04 and Unity is going to benefit Canonical and make them even
> bigger than what they are already.
>
I agree that Unity will help Canonical's OS differentia
On Sat, Apr 30, 2011 at 1:38 PM, Jan Claeys wrote:
> Etienne Goyer schreef op ma 18-04-2011 om 17:03 [-0400]:
>> Any other major roadblock beside the above? I am going to sift
>> through the bugs tagged ipv6 on Launchpad, but if there's anything
>> obvious I missed, please let me know.
>>
>> Fina
Etienne Goyer schreef op ma 18-04-2011 om 17:03 [-0400]:
> Any other major roadblock beside the above? I am going to sift
> through the bugs tagged ipv6 on Launchpad, but if there's anything
> obvious I missed, please let me know.
>
> Finally, a question to consider is whether we want to address
On Sat, 2011-04-30 at 15:24 +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
> I'm actually gonna go against the grain and say that I reckon the
> release of
> Ubuntu 11.04 and Unity is going to benefit Canonical and make them
> even
> bigger than what they are already.
Bigger isn't always better. What we want is a heal
