On 10-08-31 05:42 PM, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:09:55PM -0700, Jim Kielman wrote:
>>
>> are more then adequate for the average user that is running any
>> services. To answer your questions as to why they have to use a
>> firewall, they don't, it's just something they did
On Tue, Aug 31, 2010 at 05:09:55PM -0700, Jim Kielman wrote:
>
> are more then adequate for the average user that is running any
> services. To answer your questions as to why they have to use a
> firewall, they don't, it's just something they did when they ran
> Windows, and they can't believe
On 10-08-31 08:21 AM, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 07:59 -0700, George Farris wrote:
>>
>> Gufw is in no way suitable for a new user. They have no idea what
>> iptables are or rules for that matter.
>>
>> George
>
> What is the actual use case for a simple and graphical firewa
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 19:35 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> I think working to promote cross desktop adoption of technologies that
> make it easier to interact with data in a consistent, DE independent
> manner, (like Akonadi) will do more to solve this class of problems
> than specification work.
"Martin Owens" wrote:
>
>
>On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 00:19 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
>> For example you are saying that emails should go to the directory
>> specified in user-dirs.[defaults,dirs] but that makes no sense uless
>> we
>> are thinking about $DOCUMENTS/.email_app/. Emails, while
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 00:19 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
> For example you are saying that emails should go to the directory
> specified in user-dirs.[defaults,dirs] but that makes no sense uless
> we
> are thinking about $DOCUMENTS/.email_app/. Emails, while being
> documents, aren't really
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 22:51 +0200, Sebastian Geiger wrote:
> Hi,
Hey Sebastian,
(...)
> I just wanted to bring this up, if there has already been a discussion
> about this, maybe someone can point me to it or let me know about the
> current status about this issue.
This topic shows up from time
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:34 -0400, Martin Owens wrote:
>
> A common mistake which is repeated a few times in the links you provided
> is the part about XDG_DATA_HOME being the location for user files. What
> the specification means by 'user specific data files' is not your
> emails, photographs or
Hey Sebastian,
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 22:51 +0200, Sebastian Geiger wrote:
> I just wanted to bring this up, if there has already been a discussion
> about this, maybe someone can point me to it or let me know about the
> current status about this issue.
XDG underuse and misuse is a pet peeve of
Hi,
has there ever been a discussion about the FreeDesktop Spec for
configuration files. FYI, the spec says to put config files not into the
home folder directly but instead proposes there separate directories:
XDG_DATA_HOME: ~/.local/share
XDG_CONFIG_HOME: ~/.config
XDG_CACHE_HOME: ~/
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 17:21 +0200, Krzysztof Klimonda wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 07:59 -0700, George Farris wrote:
> >
> > Gufw is in no way suitable for a new user. They have no idea what
> > iptables are or rules for that matter.
> >
> > George
>
> What is the actual use case for a simple
On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 07:59 -0700, George Farris wrote:
>
> Gufw is in no way suitable for a new user. They have no idea what
> iptables are or rules for that matter.
>
> George
What is the actual use case for a simple and graphical firewall? Why do
people who have no idea what iptables or rule
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 17:58 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, August 30, 2010 05:49:48 pm George Farris wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:20 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 09:22:40PM -0400, Greg Bair wrote:
> > > > On 08/28/2010 08:35 PM, Robert Holtzman wrot
On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 17:58 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Monday, August 30, 2010 05:49:48 pm George Farris wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:20 -0700, Robert Holtzman wrote:
> > > On Sat, Aug 28, 2010 at 09:22:40PM -0400, Greg Bair wrote:
> > > > On 08/28/2010 08:35 PM, Robert Holtzman wrot
Hi,
I think firestarter is the best of it's kind. I've been using it for three
years and it always dowse the job. we better think in removing UFW than
firestarter
On 2010 8 31 00:59, "Scott Kitterman" wrote:
On Monday, August 30, 2010 05:49:48 pm George Farris wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-08-30 at 14:2
15 matches
Mail list logo
