On Tue, 2010-08-31 at 19:35 -0400, Scott Kitterman wrote: > I think working to promote cross desktop adoption of technologies that > make it easier to interact with data in a consistent, DE independent > manner, (like Akonadi) will do more to solve this class of problems > than specification work.
I agree. But isn't that what I was saying? Such guides are for promoting cross desktop adoption of standard tech. Help programmers see how it works quickly? Or did it look like I was suggesting each person develop independent libs? I thought the recent Akonadi diagram on planet ubuntu was very useful. Shame about the 'K' name of the project and the kde location of it's code, would have been nice to have it on github/savanah/launchpad etc. Save a lot of face for a lot of devels in other projects. So who's up for ripping out EDS and replacing it with Akonadi for Narwhal? OK maybe I do know Akonadi isn't a storage mechanism, but at least we could wedge it between EDS and Evolution. Martin, -- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss
