On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 01:54:21AM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > First, afaik automatic-expiration is not enabled for Ubuntu. It tracks
> > when bugs will expire but doesn't close them without human action.
> >
>
> Ok
Null Ack wrote:
> On 27th of June I asked the MOTU mail list what it was and advised
> "The correct way to do this is to file a bug against the package and
> tag it "upgrade"." Since I've done this for 6+ bugs.
This is indeed the documented current process.
> Yesterday I filed two bugs comply
On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 11:44 PM, Bryce Harrington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> First, afaik automatic-expiration is not enabled for Ubuntu. It tracks
> when bugs will expire but doesn't close them without human action.
>
Ok, so what does expiring mean then?
> So... I think this isn't a problem.
Gday folks,
Can I please be clarified on what the correct process is for package
update requests?
On 27th of June I asked the MOTU mail list what it was and advised
"The correct way to do this is to file a bug against the package and
tag it "upgrade"." Since I've done this for 6+ bugs.
Yesterday
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 11:32:20PM +0200, Wouter Stomp wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Bugs that are marked incomplete and subsequently get a reply from the
> original reporter often stay in the incomplete status. This means they
> automatically get closed even though the needed info was provided. I
> think i
> What should be
> considered obsolete (mini itx boards with C3s are still for sale
> http://www.mini-itx.com/store/?c=2 so if Via have stopped building them
> it can't have been long ago).
cmov was introduced:
By Intel: 1 Nov 1995. All Pentium Pro/P2 onwards
By AMD: Mid 1999 onwards with AMD K
Hello,
Bugs that are marked incomplete and subsequently get a reply from the
original reporter often stay in the incomplete status. This means they
automatically get closed even though the needed info was provided. I
think it would be a good idea to automatically change the status to
new once a ne
Philip Wyett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> We have two libavcodec packages, libavcodec51 in main and
> libavcodec1d in universe. A quick delve into the package shows that
> lbavcodec51 is a stripped package to disable anything mpeg and bad,
> but if you go by the package description you see in sy
Olá Vishal e a todos.
On Sunday 31 August 2008 07:00:23 Vishal Rao wrote:
> What is the latest status of the possibility of including FF 3.1 by default
> in Intrepid?
You can add fta ppa to your sources, and give FF3.1 a try.
https://launchpad.net/~fta/+archive
--
BUGabundo :o)
(``-_-´´)
On Mon, Sep 01, 2008 at 08:18:18AM +0100, Sam Tygier wrote:
> Colin Watson wrote:
> >On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:49:27AM -0400, M G wrote:
> >>Subject: Intrepid compatibility with C3 CPUs #5212
> >
> >Are you referring to a particular bug here?
> >https://launchpad.net/bugs/5212 is something quite d
Colin Watson wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 21, 2008 at 01:49:27AM -0400, M G wrote:
>> Subject: Intrepid compatibility with C3 CPUs #5212
>
> Are you referring to a particular bug here?
> https://launchpad.net/bugs/5212 is something quite different.
MG's message got detached from the start of the thread.
11 matches
Mail list logo
