On Oct 22, 2007, at 7:08 AM, Martin Olsson wrote:
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
A confirmation alert is usually the worst possible solution to any
design problem. People treat it as an interruption rather than as a
serious question. (Some horrid Web sites already do this, with
JavaScript alert
Op zondag 21-10-2007 om 11:28 uur [tijdzone -0400], schreef Scott
Kitterman:
> IIRC, there were a number of open bugs against Firefox regarding
> incorrect loss of focus and so what often happened was that you could
> lose focus in a text box without taking action to do so and then end
> up paging
Op zondag 21-10-2007 om 12:53 uur [tijdzone +1300], schreef Matthew Paul
Thomas:
> On Oct 21, 2007, at 9:03 PM, Martin Olsson wrote:
> >
> > Nicolas Alvarez wrote:
> >>
> >> It's the wrong way to fix it. You can lose data by clicking enter
> >> while a link is focused too, should we disable the ent
I'm going to do so. The first assumption is that a set of repository servers
have synchronized data correctly. But that will be ok after the md5sum
verification.
On 10/22/07, Nicolas Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On 10/21/07, yueyu lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/22/07, Nicolas A
On 10/21/07, yueyu lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 10/22/07, Nicolas Alvarez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 10/21/07, yueyu lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > As you noticed, sometimes, synaptic downloads packages slowly. I noticed
> > > that apt-get in fact can use multiple threads to dow
The problem to download from multiple server is that multiple servers may
not be synchronized at the same time.
Data synchronization is a serious problem. But I guess this should be better
if we can make sure that multiple servers have the same package files.
On 10/22/07, Nicolas Alvarez <[EMAIL P
On 10/21/07, yueyu lin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> As you noticed, sometimes, synaptic downloads packages slowly. I noticed
> that apt-get in fact can use multiple threads to download sometimes. But
> synaptic seems seldom to do this.
> I wanna know why? In fact, it will not be difficult to modify
As you noticed, sometimes, synaptic downloads packages slowly. I noticed
that apt-get in fact can use multiple threads to download sometimes. But
synaptic seems seldom to do this.
I wanna know why? In fact, it will not be difficult to modify codes to
support active multiple threads downloading. But
I think that there is an occasional need to check the file system for
errors, but I think that it might work better as an optional, but
"highly recommended" thing.
Here's another case in point:
I have been working to set up an Ubuntu-based Asterisk phone server at
my workplace. For this applicat
On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 17:45 -0700, Martin Olsson wrote:
> Scott Kitterman wrote:
> > On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:08, Martin Olsson wrote:
> >
> >> And to justify this crippled BACKSPACE key you still would have to
> >> explain why this is not a problem on Windows ("the main platform of
> >> igno
I know the policy about not posting here bugs because they are often not
so important as they seem to the original reporter, but I'm really
afraid this one could give a really bad image about Ubuntu ability to
cope with common desktop users:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/openoffice.org
I'm going to add an anecdote to this thread why running fsck (at least in
textmode) at startup is bad.
Some good friends of mine use ubuntu on their HTPC. The connected HDTV can't
display the text mode under which the fsck runs, this results in a blue
screen during the whole operation. As these fol
Hi
Maybe i found a solution for this problem:
Am Dienstag, den 16.10.2007, 15:48 +0100 schrieb Ian Jackson:
> Alexander Sack writes ("Re: Untrusted software and security click-through
> warnings"):
> > I completely agree. My point is: if captchas don't help then why would
> > pasting commands fr
Scott Kitterman wrote:
> On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:08, Martin Olsson wrote:
>
>> And to justify this crippled BACKSPACE key you still would have to
>> explain why this is not a problem on Windows ("the main platform of
>> ignorant computer users")? Why is it that Firefox on Windows still has
>>
> If you want to talk about Windows/Linux consistencey in Firefox, there are
> far
> more common issues. Get Preferences moved from Edit to Tools in Linux is
> you
> are worried about consistency.
Sure, from an accessibility perspective you are comparing a non frequently
used menu entry change w
On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:08, Martin Olsson wrote:
> And to justify this crippled BACKSPACE key you still would have to
> explain why this is not a problem on Windows ("the main platform of
> ignorant computer users")? Why is it that Firefox on Windows still has
> this "really serious data loss
Matthew Paul Thomas wrote:
>
> A confirmation alert is usually the worst possible solution to any
> design problem. People treat it as an interruption rather than as a
> serious question. (Some horrid Web sites already do this, with
> JavaScript alerts of the form "Are you sure you want to navi
17 matches
Mail list logo
