On Sun, 2007-10-21 at 17:45 -0700, Martin Olsson wrote: > Scott Kitterman wrote: > > On Sunday 21 October 2007 14:08, Martin Olsson wrote: > > > >> And to justify this crippled BACKSPACE key you still would have to > >> explain why this is not a problem on Windows ("the main platform of > >> ignorant computer users")? Why is it that Firefox on Windows still has > >> this "really serious data loss problem"? Maybe it's because if someone > >> made a change like this in Firefox on Windows people would be converting > >> back IE "en masse". Of course, this is Linux so people don't have a > >> choice (unless they want to go proprietary and use Opera). > >> > > No. The fact that it is a problem is sufficient. > > To some extent this is a "color of the bikeshed" (*) kind of issue, so > it's important to end it once the most important arguments had been laid > out. For my part, I've made all the points I wanted to make around this > issue so this will be my last post on this thread before some actual > progress is made. A big thanks to all the people that helped clarify the > arguments on both sides. I certainly hope that TB will review this > issue, but in the end it's their call of course. > The TB will not make any call until the matter is referred to the TB -- and that should only happen once dialogue here has broken down and no consensus reached.
Scott -- Scott James Remnant [EMAIL PROTECTED]
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- Ubuntu-devel-discuss mailing list Ubuntu-devel-discuss@lists.ubuntu.com Modify settings or unsubscribe at: https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-devel-discuss