On 2022-05-02 16:48, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
On 2022-03-09 17:53, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
I just requested that Debian sets the NO_PKG_MANGLE variable.
https://bugs.debian.org/1006970
If approved we can force sync when considered appropriate.
Well, I did an NMU.
Is it time to force sync
On 2022-03-09 17:53, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
I just requested that Debian sets the NO_PKG_MANGLE variable.
https://bugs.debian.org/1006970
If approved we can force sync when considered appropriate.
Well, I did an NMU.
Is it time to force sync debianutils now?
--
Gunnar Hjalmarsson
https:/
On 2022-01-24 15:53, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
On 2022-01-24 15:27, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Longer term it would be easier if we do a merge from debian now to
preserve just the `export NO_PKG_MANGLE=1` delta (if that is still
required),
Setting that variable was my idea. The reason is that
On 2022-01-24 15:27, Dimitri John Ledkov wrote:
Longer term it would be easier if we do a merge from debian now to
preserve just the `export NO_PKG_MANGLE=1` delta (if that is still
required),
Setting that variable was my idea. The reason is that without it, the
translation files are stripped
Longer term it would be easier if we do a merge from debian now to
preserve just the `export NO_PKG_MANGLE=1` delta (if that is still
required), otherwise a forcesync.
--
Regards,
Dimitri.
On Mon, Jan 24, 2022 at 1:40 PM Robie Basak wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:05:38PM +, Robie Ba
On Wed, Dec 01, 2021 at 04:05:38PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> This has now landed in the release pocket. Thanks to all involved for
> your help.
You may have noticed that Debian CTTE have overruled some of these
changes in the debianutils package in Debian and reverted them in Debian
itself.
tem
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:45:56PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:56:28PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:53:03PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > > Any objections to an upload to debianutils in Ubuntu reverting these two
> > > changes?
> >
> > It turn
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 01:57:33PM +0100, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> I think it's fine to keep that deprecation warning.
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 02:12:13PM +0100, Julian Andres Klode wrote:
> Let's keep them, suddenly undeprecating it would be weird. It also
> apparently broke no or few autopkgtests,
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:45:56PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:56:28PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:53:03PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > > Any objections to an upload to debianutils in Ubuntu reverting these two
> > > changes?
> >
> > It turn
On Tue, Nov 30, 2021 at 12:45:56PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> tempfile still prints a deprecation warning to stderr. This looks like
> it was introduced since Hirsute in Ubuntu and so also exists in Impish
> and Jammy currently. Do we still want the deprecation warning in Jammy,
> or should I drop
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 03:56:28PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:53:03PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> > Any objections to an upload to debianutils in Ubuntu reverting these two
> > changes?
>
> It turned out to be a bit of a rabbithole getting the package to rebuild
> with
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:59:19PM +, Dimitri Ledkov wrote:
> I have been playing whack-a-mole trying to fix usage of those two
> commands in all the places. It will be a painful and long process, not
> only because we need to merge changes from Debian, but because we have
> Ubuntu-specific del
On 2021-11-25 17:42, Robie Basak wrote:
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +0100, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
But.. With Ubuntu's language pack arrangement, those translations
are already in Launchpad. If I understand it correctly,
regenerating the POT file would have been sufficient.
I had to p
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 05:16:52PM +0100, Gunnar Hjalmarsson wrote:
> On 2021-11-25 16:56, Robie Basak wrote:
> >It turned out to be a bit of a rabbithole getting the package to rebuild
> >with translated string changes, but I have a work-in-progress branch up
> >here:
> >
> >https://code.launchpad
On 2021-11-25 16:56, Robie Basak wrote:
It turned out to be a bit of a rabbithole getting the package to rebuild
with translated string changes, but I have a work-in-progress branch up
here:
https://code.launchpad.net/~racb/ubuntu/+source/debianutils/+git/debianutils/+merge/412397
But.. With U
On Thu, Nov 25, 2021 at 12:53:03PM +, Robie Basak wrote:
> Any objections to an upload to debianutils in Ubuntu reverting these two
> changes?
It turned out to be a bit of a rabbithole getting the package to rebuild
with translated string changes, but I have a work-in-progress branch up
here:
I have been playing whack-a-mole trying to fix usage of those two
commands in all the places. It will be a painful and long process, not
only because we need to merge changes from Debian, but because we have
Ubuntu-specific deltas that use those commands all over the place as
well.
I agree that it
On 2021-11-25 7:53 a.m., Robie Basak wrote:
> You may be aware of a couple of recent changes in debianutils in Debian:
>
> 1. The "tempfile" command has been removed.
>
> 2. The "which" command now prints a deprecation warning on every
> invocation.
>
> These have ramifications across the archi
You may be aware of a couple of recent changes in debianutils in Debian:
1. The "tempfile" command has been removed.
2. The "which" command now prints a deprecation warning on every
invocation.
These have ramifications across the archive, and also outside the
archive, as everything that relies o
19 matches
Mail list logo
