** Attachment added: "uname-a.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14600561/uname-a.log
--
Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "version.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14600572/version.log
--
Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
** Attachment added: "dmesg.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14600574/dmesg.log
--
Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
** Attachment added: "lspci-vvnn.log"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14600589/lspci-vvnn.log
--
Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to U
Leann,
I installed kernel 2.6.25.1 as advised. Didn't solve the problem,
though. My harddisks are still addressed as UDMA2 and performance is as
bad as with 2.6.24.
BTW: KDE wouldn't start with the new kernel (I'm using Kubuntu). All I
got was the console.
--
Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/
Sorry - I forgot to add that I have a MSI 915P/G Neo2 motherboard with a
VIA6410 IDE Raid Controller.
--
Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribe
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404827 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827
My remark above was related to FF 3.6a1pre but the bug still exists in
the new 3.6a2pre.
--
Something wrong with the security function in Shiretoko (Firefox 3.5).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397907
You r
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404827 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827
... and also in v. 3.5.3pre
--
Something wrong with the security function in Shiretoko (Firefox 3.5).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/397907
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubu
Thanks - the fix works for 3.5 and 3.6. Great!
--
Firefox doesn't warn about Attack Sites!?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 404827 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827
FF 3.6 Minefield from the ppa shows the same behaviour - no warning on
the above mentioned site.
--
Something wrong with the security function in Shiretoko (Firefox 3.5).
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/3979
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 377560 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377560
The ppa version doesn't work here. The only way to make it work is using
the method described on http://www.csamuel.org/2009/05/23/digikam-
problem-with-kde-43-beta-1. Downgrading marble is no option as variou
I can confirm that beta1 works for me although I haven't tested it
thoroughly for other bugs.
--
[karmic] Digikam does not display anything in the main pane
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub
I can confirm that beta1 works for me with KDE 4.3 final although I
haven't tested it thoroughly for other bugs.
--
[karmic] Digikam does not display anything in the main pane
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/377560
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which
Thanks. The fix works for me - no more crashes.
--
plasma-desktop crashes randomly
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/395893
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to kdebase-workspace in ubuntu.
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@li
@Pjotr: Couldn't agree more. This is a disaster from a security
viewpoint. We're always telling Windows users that they need something
like Secunia PSI to make sure that they will keep their applications
updated. And we're telling them: Switch to Ubuntu, and you won't have
this problem. - And now t
Yes, it's more than sad. It's rather a breach of trust. Is there another
way to ring the alarm bell?
Pjotr is right that this is a structural problem. Considering the
subscribers to this bug, I wonder why his posting in the MOTU list was
even necessary.
And I'm beginning to wonder how many other
@Matthias Klose: It must be possible to critisize something without
being a developer. IMO, it's a breach of trust from a user's
perspective. Why?
1. A patch is available for Karmic (and in some ppa's). Even without being a
developer, I cannot imagine that it's so difficult to provide a patched v
Yes, it's available for Karmic but unfortunately not for Jaunty and
earlier. And Sun has just released 6u16 which doesn't contain any new
fixes for security vulnerabilities, though.
--
sun-java6 should be updated to 6u15
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/411733
You received this bug notification be
I agree with xor. The java packages are critical applications used by
many people. Not applying the updates that fix their vulnerabilities in
due time undermines the reputation of Ubuntu as a secure operating
system. Fixing them only in Karmic is definitely not enough. And the
solution proposed by
I'm having the same problem using Hardy. Any chance to write a patch
like pad's one for Gutsy mentioned in comment #8 above?
--
Wrong UDMA mode due to error in 40/80 wire cable detection
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/195221
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
B
@Micah Gersten: I've only installed FF 3.5.4 in Jaunty and the fix
works. But perhaps it's because I added https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-
mozilla-daily/+archive/ppa
--
Firefox doesn't warn about Attack Sites!?
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/404827
You received this bug notification because you a
Since Jamie proposed to use OpenJDK as an alternative: I don't know
about Firefox 3.0, but OpenJDK doesn't work properly under FF 3.5 - see
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/firefox-3.5/+bug/359407 - and
doesn't work at all under FF 3.6 (it doesn't even show up under
about:plugins). So muc
The problem persists with openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-3ubuntu1.
Am I really the only one with this error? I'm surprised that nobody seems to
be interested.
--
[Karmic] openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3 freezes Firefox 3.5.x
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476550
You received this bug notification because you
Problem solved. I installed Karmic anew using the Alternate CD.
Previously I had installed it anew using the Live CD (with formatting
the root partition and mounting the existing home partition). After all
I don't know what caused and fixed the error. It's working now as
expected.
** Changed in: o
Unfortunately today the problem is back ...
** Changed in: openjdk-6 (Ubuntu)
Status: Invalid => New
--
[Karmic] openjdk 6b16-1.6.1-1ubuntu3 freezes Firefox 3.5.x
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/476550
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is su
While apparmor works in Karmic with kernel 2.6.31.x, the mentioned error
comes up when using the 2.6.32.x mainline kernel. Any idea how to fix
this?
--
apparmor fails to load at startup
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/375422
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
@Michał Gołębiowski: I can confirm that this problem didn't exist in
Jaunty where Virtualbox ran very well with SMP (2 cpus) enabled (and, of
course, VT-x which is required for SMP). I have an Intel Core2Duo E8400
with 3 GHz.
Now under Karmic the situation is considerably worse: With SMP enabled,
I forgot to mention one thing: In the Virtualbox forums there are some
posters who wrote that installing the real time kernel (incl. headers)
improved the performance of Virtualbox considerably. I tried, and it
didn't make a difference for me. But it might be worth a try for others.
(Note, however,
I had the same problem after installing Kubuntu 14.04 64bit. During the
installation process I mounted an existing home partition encrypted with
ecryptfs. Result: The swap partition was not available/mounted. After
manually implementing syscon-hh's solution in the first post, all is
well.
--
You
I should have added that sudo blkid reported a different UUID for the
swap partition than the one used in /etc/crypttab. Replacing that one
with the UUID reported by blkid did not solve the problem.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
Installing xserver-xorg-lts-quantal (and linux-generic-lts-quantal) as
suggested on https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack breaks
Kubuntu as crucial KDE packages like kubuntu-desktop, kdm etc. will be
removed.
** Affects: lowmem (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Oops - I somehow got here in "lowmem" erroneously. Sorry! How can I
delete or move it to the right section?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133453
Title:
xserver-xorg-lts-quantal bre
** Changed in: lowmem (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1133453
Title:
xserver-xorg-lts-quantal breaks Kubuntu
To manage notifications about this
Public bug reported:
Installing xserver-xorg-lts-quantal as suggested on
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack breaks Kubuntu 12.04
as crucial KDE packages like kubuntu-desktop, kdm etc. will be removed.
** Affects: xorg-lts-quantal (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status:
** Description changed:
Installing xserver-xorg-lts-quantal as suggested on
- https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack breaks Kubuntu as
- crucial KDE packages like kubuntu-desktop, kdm etc. will be removed.
+ https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Kernel/LTSEnablementStack breaks Kubuntu 12.04
+ as c
Jamie, I'm sorry but I've just done a release upgrade to Quantal. I
guess your suggestion won't give us new insights now, will it?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098
Title:
AppArm
Public bug reported:
My HP printer suddenly didn't work anymore, and /var/log/syslog reported
for udev-configure-printer:
"failed to connect to CUPS server; giving up"
I decided to reinstall cups and hplip and got the following error
messages:
"AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin
Forgot to mention that I'm using Kubuntu 12.04.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098
Title:
AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd
To manage notifications about t
I think I found the culprit: I was modifying an AppArmor profile for
Thunderbird. When I executed aa-logprof, I got the following message:
Enforce-mode changes:
@jdstrand:
Ubuntu 3.5.0-14.18~precise1-generic 3.5.3
I've added https://launchpad.net/~ubuntu-x-swat/+archive/q-lts-backport
to my repositories. Perhaps related to that one?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs
It happened again. I finetuned the Thunderbird profile with aa-logprof,
and again it wanted to modify the cupsd profile by adding that
capability.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098
It also happened when I tweaked my Google Chrome profile with aa-
logprof. I chose "Finish".
Anyway, /var/log/syslog says:
[ 5303.439870] type=1400 audit(1348065251.369:4090): apparmor="DENIED"
operation="capable" parent=1 profile="/usr/sbin/cupsd" pid=1235
comm="cupsd" pid=1235 comm="cupsd" capa
@Jamie: I understand, that explains it. Thanks a lot!
I'm using cips 1.5.3-0ubuntu4
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1052098
Title:
AppArmor parser error for /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.c
Sure - see the attachment.
** Attachment added: "cups.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+attachment/3347820/+files/cups.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Jamie, now I'm confused. As a matter of fact,
/etc/apparmor.d/local/usr.sbin.cupsd here is completely empty.
And, yes, I commented out
# capability block_suspend,
in /etc/apparmor.d/usr.sbin.cupsd in order to avoid this bug. I noticed
that it was shown in the attachment under ##included
- but a
** Attachment added: "apparmor_1.d.tar.gz"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/cups/+bug/1052098/+attachment/3348830/+files/apparmor_1.d.tar.gz
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1
Nobody? Really?
I mean, Kubuntu 12.04 is an LTS version, too. That a (semi-)official
upgrade suggestion dismantles it and nobody seems to care, is rather
weird, IMO.
BTW: Other Ubuntu flavours like Xubuntu, Lubuntu etc. might also be
affected although I haven't checked that.
--
You received th
And it's enabled on my system, too. However, libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-quantal
won't be installed by Muon, Synaptic or apt-get.
Only if I *manually* add libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-quantal :
sudo apt-get install xserver-xorg-lts-quantal libgl1-mesa-glx-lts-
quantal
... kubuntu-desktop etc. won't be removed.
The attachment shows what aptitude reports.
** Attachment added: "aptitude.txt"
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/xorg-lts-quantal/+bug/1134492/+attachment/3634501/+files/aptitude.txt
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed t
Just download the respective Debian package from
http://packages.debian.org/experimental/krusader
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1065110
Title:
krusader fails to enter .zip archive wi
Re #9: Sorry for the late response. I tested it with the newest version
0.8.16~exp12ubuntu10.10 and it still doesn't work as expected.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1134492
Title:
x
@Sami Mäkinen: Fully ACK. It seems that AppArmor doesn't have a high
priority for Ubuntu developers. It's time to think about moving to,
e.g., Tomoyo.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/7125
Public bug reported:
Starting some time ago I've been getting apparmor error messages
affecting several pofiles which are in enforce mode. In all these error
messages read access to /etc/ld.so.preload is denied.
According to the kernel protocol the affected profiles on my system are:
/sbin/dhcli
Forgot to mention that I'm using Kubuntu 11,04 with KDE 4.7 and kernel
3.0.0-8 from the xorg-edgers ppa.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/825231
Title:
apparmor: denied read access to /
Jamie, why don't you want to add these devices? I mean most Nvidia card
users should be affected by this problem. But not all of them are able
to debug AppArmor and to edit the related profile - they would probably
chose to NOT use this FF profile at all. I'm not sure if that's really
what we want.
Or, as a general question: Why don't add rules that don't "hurt" but
improve the acceptance of AppArmor?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712584
Title:
Firefox-4.0: AppArmor blocks acce
This issue is not yet fixed in the apparmor profile for FF 4.0 b13.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/712584
Title:
Firefox-4.0: AppArmor errors on certain websites
--
ubuntu-bugs mail
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: apparmor
with Firefox 4.0 (currently b12 from the ppa but it happened also with previous
betas) on Ubuntu 10.10 I'm getting AppArmor error messages like:
type=1400 audit(1296725581.050:58): apparmor="DENIED" operation="open" parent=1
profile="/usr/lib
Will this fix be backported to Lucid?
--
Qt 4.7.0 breaks QX11EmbedWidget
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/614699
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Kubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to qt4-x11 in ubuntu.
--
kubuntu-bugs mailing list
kubuntu-b...@lists.ubuntu.com
https
59 matches
Mail list logo
