Hi Jean-Baptiste
I simply reinstall Ubuntu 7.04 and upgrade by internet to version 8.04.
Since it works fine.
Please find hereafter the log files
Regards
2008/7/30 Jean-Baptiste Lallement <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks for your report.
>
> The problem is with update-rc.d .
>
> Is this still an iss
Have exactly the same problem on my laptop. Upgraded yesterday from
Hardy to Intrepid.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ setxkbmap -print
xkb_keymap {
xkb_keycodes { include "evdev+aliases(qwerty)" };
xkb_types { include "complete" };
xkb_compat{ include "complete" };
Starting with a new user did the trick, no problem with the up arrow
anymore...
--
Up arrow key mapped to Print [screen]
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/255008
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: seq24
Description of problem:
Since Ubuntu Jaunty, Seq24 (0.8.7-2ubuntu1) will boot normally, however when
you go to edit a "cell" by right-clicking the "cell' and choosing either Edit
or New, Seq 24 Seg-faults. The same bug was described and fixed in F
Yes, I can confirm that building the latest release 0.9.0 of Seq24 fixes
the problem.
Can Jaunty be updated to the latest version?
--
Seq24 crashes when right clicking edit or new (cell)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/346277
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubun
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: cron
Upgrade from Gutsy to Hardy failed for this package and more others
(ubuntu-standrd, nvidia packages...)
ProblemType: Package
Architecture: amd64
Date: Mon Apr 28 13:22:49 2008
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 8.04
ErrorMessage: le sous-processus post-installa
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13983951/Dependencies.txt
** Attachment added: "DpkgTerminalLog.gz"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13983952/DpkgTerminalLog.gz
--
package cron 3.0pl1-100ubuntu2 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-processus
post-installa
This affects me too
** Attachment added: "lswh.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41402926/lswh.txt
--
Lucid freeze after close lid
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/538521
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
In addition to the lswh.txt I posted, I as well use a recompiled kernel
without the ACPI 'Suspend to RAM' and 'Hibernation' activated as I don't
use them.
I don't know if it has anything to do with the current bug, but I just
suppose that once the lid of my laptop is down, Lucid might try to
activ
I am not sure it is linked to the theme... I browsed through all the
ones available in Ubuntu and still get the exact same issue (c.f.
screenshot space between the sound icon and the battery one).
In addition, I set the applet up to not show the envelope for GWibber,
Evolution and so on, but now i
I have exactly the same bug.
I use :
Ubuntu 9.04 - Jaunty Jackalope - amd64
Linux little-babasse 2.6.28-15-generic #52-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 9 10:48:52 UTC
2009 x86_64 GNU/Linux
I have reproduced the bug and save the backtrace with gdb. See the
attached file.
In Synaptic the installed package is
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubuntuone-client
no connexion at all on my computer (nc10 samsung netbook)
ProblemType: Bug
.home.aurelien..cache.ubuntuone.log.oauth.login.log:
Démarrage du client Ubuntu One version 1.0.2
Démarrage du client Ubuntu One version 1.0.2
.home.aurelien..c
** Attachment added:
".home.aurelien..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.exceptions.log.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37202628/.home.aurelien..cache.ubuntuone.log.syncdaemon.exceptions.log.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/37202629/Dependencies.txt
Public bug reported:
This bug became after dist-upgrade 11.10 -> 12.04
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: grub-pc 1.99-21ubuntu3.1
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038973
Title:
package grub-pc 1.99-21ubuntu3.1 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-
processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur d
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1038975
Title:
package friendly-recovery 0.2.25 failed to install/upgrade: le sous-
processus script post-installation installé a retourné une erreur d
Public bug reported:
This bug became after dist-upgrade 11.10 -> 12.04
ProblemType: Package
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 12.04
Package: friendly-recovery 0.2.25
ProcVersionSignature: Ubuntu 3.2.0-29.46-generic 3.2.24
Uname: Linux 3.2.0-29-generic x86_64
NonfreeKernelModules: fglrx
ApportVersion: 2.0.1-0
Hi, it affects me to with Ubuntu 12.04 (Unity). I have the same bug. My
workaround, create a tarball before encrypt.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/913159
Title:
Archive type dropdown
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 131094 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/131094
It seems to me that I have the same issue: high I/O but low cpu utilization as
well as high disk utilization but low throughput. My bootup times are very slow
(up to 5min for the desktop to fully load).
I h
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: texlive-full
I tried to compile latex documents using the templates used in
bioinformatics
(http://www.oxfordjournals.org/our_journals/bioinformatics/for_authors/submission_online.html)
and failed to do so in hardy and intrepid.
Even the test document pr
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: network-manager
I have weird problems with network-manager 0.7. As I have the same
problem on intrepid and hardy (using PPA packages for NM 0.7), I don't
think it can be a kernel problem (it works fine on hardy with NM 0.6 and
the same hardware/kernel).
** Attachment added: "log extract"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/18961135/daemon.log
--
unreliable WPA connection with network-manager 0.7
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/290193
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubu
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 263963 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/263963
Indeed, it looks similar, but I'm not sure it is "only" a kernel bug: on
hardy, using the SAME kernel, the problem is only present if I use
network-manager 0.7
--
unreliable WPA connection with network-manag
I can confirm this.
When using compiz, the area selector works fine but the recording is messed up
(and compiz is not yet working/stable/glitch free for everyone).
as a (quick and dirty) workaround, I forced byzanz to set a root window
when selecting an area in src/byzanzselect.c by breaking the
I can confirm this as well (on a 32bit install). It affects pdfcrop as
well, also included in texlive.
I grabbed poppler 0.11.1 from http://poppler.freedesktop.org/ and compiled it
using the debian directory of the 0.11.2 package.
Beside a problem with a missing html documentation, the build went
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xserver-xorg-video-intel
it seems similar to bug #399829 which appears at each frequency but 85Hz.
In this case, none of the listed frequency fixes the problem.
ProblemType: Bug
Architecture: i386
Date: Fri Aug 7 16:17:37 2009
DistroRelease: Ubuntu 9.10
** Attachment added: "BootDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30005808/BootDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "CurrentDmesg.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30005809/CurrentDmesg.txt
** Attachment added: "Dependencies.txt"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/30005810/Dependencies.txt
** A
It seems to have been a problem with the in-kernel part of the driver and KMS,
fixed in the latest kernel update (2.6.31-6):
* I spotted some flicker in usplash and text console as well
* booting without KMS removed it
* it is gone, even with KMS enabled in 2.6.31-6 (and back if booting again on
short version: fixed for me
long version: my system was working with self-made packages of poppler 0.11.0
and the same behaviour appeared (I guess) after the latest texlive update.
It is now working fine again with the poppler version available in the archive
but not with the older version!
The
I have mixed feelings about this.
I was about to report a similar bug for grub as the move to UUID
everywhere currently prevents my edgy system from booting (I can boot if
I put back the old "root=/dev/mapper/" argument in grub). I am
marking this as also affecting grub, for the record.
On th
I guess that the original reporter really did mean "not needed", but it my
case, it causes a bug :)
I have just checked, it is still present after recreating my initramfs. The
problem is that it can not find my LVM volume by UUID.
The strange thing is that /etc/fstab has also been modified to use
--
font rendering broken in edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/54205
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
after the recent upgrade of gtk-engines, the font rendering is broken in
edgy, as chown in the attached picture
** Affects: gtk-engines (Ubuntu)
Importance: Untriaged
Status: Unconfirmed
--
font rendering broken in edgy
https://launchpad.net/bugs/54205
--
ubu
No, I am using the default ubuntu theme on an up to date edgy system.
ii xserver-xorg-core1.1.1-0ubuntu1 X.Org X server -- core
server
ii xserver-xorg 7.0.22ubuntu6the X.Org X server
ii ubuntu-artwork 31 Ubuntu themes an
update: I have just launched a Qt app to check and it has the same problem, it
is not a gtk/pango thing.
I might be related with the last xft update:
xft (2.1.10-1ubuntu1) edgy; urgency=low
.
* Merged with Debian experimental
* Fixed libfreetype6-dev Build-Depends
I have this version, I u
Indeed, I was using the nvidia binary driver. I thought it would not work at
all without explicitely telling it to ignore ABI changes...
Great to have xorg 7.1 then, and sorry for the noise!
I am marking the bug as rejected as they is nothing we can do with it, until a
free drivers exists :/
**
I can also confirm this problem. The same happened with f-spot which is now
fixed, I tried to rebuild the package (using apt-get source...) but this failed
with:
Printing.cs(17,10): error CS0104: `PrintJob' is an ambiguous reference between
`Gnome.PrintJob' and `Gtk.PrintJob'
after adding the
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 58492 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 58492
Openoffice.org crashes on "Save"
--
Openoffice Writer Crashes when Saving
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59733
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mail
An less hideous workaround if you are the only user of the system is to use
openoffice's dialog for open/save (in the "general" section of the options).
Anyway I am happy to learn that a rebuild is sufficient to get back gnome's
save dialog!
** Bug 59733 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
indeed, when launched by a normal user, users-admin crashes and the terminal
output says that this user was not allowed to send a dbus message.
Sorry for the extra fear it gave me. I am still pretty sure to have launched it
as a normal user a while ago, but this was either a separate (fixed) bug
It did also happen at each login for me.
I get ride of it by removing all references to external calendars, I think I
had something weird with my config. I tried once to add a google-calendar
source but entered it in the bad section and then I was unable to delete it.
After some gconf cleanup the
** Bug 59428 has been marked a duplicate of this bug
--
latest firefox update breaks gmail
https://launchpad.net/bugs/52373
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 52373 ***
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 52373
latest firefox update breaks gmail
--
Firefox compatibility issues with gmail in Edgy!!!
https://launchpad.net/bugs/59428
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: epiphany-browser
I have some strange behaviour for javascript-using webpages in epiphany.
As an example, gmail works properly except that I can not actually view
any email (the mail is marked as read but I stay in the list). In the
same vein, neither goog
This _might_ be related to a problem I am currently experiencing on
edgy, see bug 61922
--
Clicking gmail messages doesn't always display email
https://launchpad.net/bugs/38745
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
The recent updates (not sure which one of which package...) fixed the problem
for me :)
Does it still happen to you ?
--
jetdirect printer prints only the first page
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bu
As it seems to be gone for both of us, I think it is better to close
it...
** Changed in: cupsys (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
--
jetdirect printer prints only the first page
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
I can confirm this with the latest kernel in gutsy, not sure if it worked on
feisty (I only installed gutsy on this one).
Does anyone know if a fix may enter gutsy before the final release ?
--
toshiba p100 series dsdt acpi error no sound, works with acpi turned off.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/b
yes, the tooltip are still not going away in gutsy for me (or with a way
too large timeout).
--
[dapper] tooltip should disappear
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/33027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is a direct subscriber.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
I think I have the very same problem, whatever I print using gutsy I get
only one page (which can be two-sided), printing to the same network
printer from feisty works.
--
jetdirect printer prints only the first page
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147609
You received this bug notification becaus
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org
one particular slides of one of my odt presentations crashes reliably the ppt
export of openoffice.
The fun thing is that this slide does not have anything fancy, it is juste a
slightly modified version of another slide (some text, colors
** Attachment added: "a 2-slides odt file which triggers the crash"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9619226/crash_pptExport.odp
--
openoffice crash on ppt export
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147651
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug c
I think so, the cups URI is:
hp:/net/HP_LaserJet_P2015_Series?ip=
--
jetdirect printer prints only the first page
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147609
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailin
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: evince
The thumbnails generated by evince for some pdf are incomplete (see the
first file in the attached screenshot).
When opening this file, I can "force" evince to display the text by selecting
it. This is painfull but the content seems to be OK.
The
** Attachment added: "screenshot of the bad thumbnail (the first file, all
others, also from nature are OK)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/9620586/bad_thumb.png
--
bad thumnaild and printed version for some pdf
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/147670
You received this bug notification because
I had already the post-beta updates, I am using libcairo2
1.4.10-1ubuntu4 (which is stated _not_ to solve #116236).
It is probably not the same problem anyway: the pdf file given in
#116236 (the first one, not the firefox ad) opens fine in my gutsy
system and badly in feisty, while the pdf about w
It failed again. It looks to be caused by the mozilla plugin this time
(and it failed for the same reason on i386, I bet the plugin is disabled
on the arch that succedeed)
mkdir -p -m755 debian/mozilla-openoffice.org/usr/lib/openoffice/program
for f in libnpsoplugin.so nsplugin; do \
Once again the build failed. At least the cause looks different this
time!
** Changed in: openoffice.org (Ubuntu Hardy)
Status: Fix Released => Confirmed
--
openoffice in hardy doesn't build on powerpc
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/205923
You received this bug notification because you a
oups, submitted too quickly...
ii xorg 1:7.3+10ubuntu10
X.Org X Window System
ii xserver-xorg 1:7.3+10ubuntu10
the X.Org X server
ii xserver-xorg-core 2:1.4.1~git
** Attachment added: "xorg.conf (with XAA)"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/14091228/xorg.conf
--
Xorg freeze after a while with intel driver
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/225794
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ub
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: xorg
Hardware: laptop dell latitude, integrated intel graphic card
Software: up to date hardy AMD64 (updated from gutsy and followed half of hardy
devel cycle, I'll check with a fresh install when I have time to do so). compiz
is disabled, it happens wh
All freezes happened while doing something (reading pdf, using
openoffice). Il all cases I had not-so-big pdf(s) opened in evince.
As I said in my previous comment (after which I reassigned the bug to
evince which was then changed), it indeed looks like a memory leak: the
memory used by evince inc
Thank you for the translation
;-)
** Changed in: ubuntu
Status: Incomplete => New
--
Bug d'affichage lors de l'installation de gutsy
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/227666
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubun
On Thu, May 8, 2008 at 9:18 AM, unggnu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It is true that Evince consumes much memory but not more than 130 MB on
> my pc and it often reduces consumption after some time. Since I have
> enough memory I can't confirm it. Could you recheck this issue with a
> Live CD? Is
it may be related to bug #138399 and/or #136523
--
trackerd crashed with SIGSEGV
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/136251
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https
The upstream bug is very unlikely to get fixed at all now that the
backend of nautilus is switching from gnome-vfs to gio/gvfs: whatever
the current status, isn't it better to close this bug as wontfix ?
I have juste tested on hardy with the new nautilus and sftp:
* I can cancel a "live" network
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 104956 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/104956
** This bug has been marked a duplicate of bug 97630
A Openoffice Impress presentation is not correctly exported to PDF
** This bug is no longer a duplicate of bug 97630
A Openoffice Impress presentatio
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: openoffice.org
I have an OOo impress presentation using some transparency (to have a
gradient as background in the master pages). In edit mode it renders
fine but does not work in presentation mode: every partially transparent
item is completely hidden (i
This has been fixed a while ago, with other MD/LVM related bugs.
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
Status: Unconfirmed => Fix Released
--
[feisty] boot stuck in the initramfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of U
It seems that the new OOo upload still didn't build on PPC (binaries for
x86 and AMD64 are available). According to
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/13083788/buildlog_ubuntu-hardy-
powerpc.openoffice.org_1%3A2.4.0-3ubuntu1_FAILEDTOBUILD.txt.gz the
problem is still the same:
pkgmaintainermangler: Erro
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: compiz
I have some weird misbehaviour of gnome-screensaver in combination with compiz
fusion in gutsy.
It is not 100% reproductible but happens most of the time.
It looks like compiz does not let the screensaver lock the screen properly:
when the "unloc
I just ran update-initramfs for my two kernels and I the problem happens only
with the latest one: "2.6.20-14", so I am reassigning the package.
just in case, my initramfs is available here:
http://crfb.univ-mrs.fr/~naldi/initrd.img-2.6.20-14-generic
** Changed in: linux-source-2.6.20 (Ubuntu)
S
might be related to #103679, and to #103608 ?
(I am the original reporter of the second, and I have seen the same error
messages as in the first)
--
System fails to boot with 2.6.20-14
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103696
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bu
This looks similar to some other reported bugs: #103679 (I have seen the
same "failed to set xfermode" in the busybox shell) and #103696
--
[feisty] boot stuck in the initramfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which
Le samedi 07 avril 2007 à 01:19 +, Cafuego a écrit :
> Aurelien:
>
> I don't see any messages like the ones described in #103679 - the
> devices are detected properly. I don't use lvm or md on this machine, so
> I don't know if #103608 is relevant. I never g
I would surely test a newer udev packages if it fixes this problem.
Using apt-get source to rebuild the debian package should be fairly
easy, but I guess ubuntu maintains a set of additionnal patches, and
merging them might be non-trivial. Is any of the ubuntu dev willing to
upload a test package s
tells ``testing/unstable``.
/etc/lsb-release exists, and should be used instead.
--
aurelien naldi
--
Microsoft has a majority market share
https://launchpad.net/bugs/1
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Here is my output for udevd. I needed several boots to get it, so I hope
it helps ;)
** Attachment added: "output of udevd --verbose"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7031494/udevd.out
--
boot-time race condition initializing md
https://launchpad.net/bugs/75681
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubu
mdadm config file as it is included...
On 3/28/07, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aurelien Naldi writes ("[Bug 75681] Re: boot-time race condition initializing
> md"):
> > Here is my output for udevd. I needed several boots to get it, so I hope
> > it hel
On 3/28/07, Ian Jackson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Aurelien Naldi writes ("Re: [Bug 75681] Re: boot-time race condition
> initializing md"):
> > With older versions (of mdadm I think) the RAID was assembled, but
> > degraded or kind of assembled but not startab
my initramfs can be found here:
http://gin.univ-mrs.fr/GINsim/download/initrd.img-2.6.20-13-generic
NOTE: it is note the one on which I booted this morning but I think I reverted
all changes and built it again, so it should be pretty similar ;)
--
boot-time race condition initializing md
https:
Le mercredi 28 mars 2007 à 22:55 +, Ian Jackson a écrit :
> I see. Err, actually, I don't see. In what way was the assembly of
> the raid incorrect ? You say it wasn't degraded. Was it assembled at
> all ? Was it half-assembled ?
My memory does not deserve me right, sorry!
In previous ver
OK, I really appreciate that you want to fix this and I really want to help,
but this has been driving me nuts.
I can reproduce it *way too* reliably with a "normal" boot (i.e. it happens 8
times out of 10) but when trying to get a log it suddenly refused to happen :/
I started to think that the
o exit)
- adding a timeout in "/usr/share/initramfs-tools/init" works fine for
me: 5 seconds are not enough but 8 are OK ;)
--
aurelien naldi
--
boot-time race condition initializing md
https://launchpad.net/bugs/75681
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: lvm2
recent updates in feisty fixed a race condition at boot time between
mdadm and sata hard drives. This fix seems to have been working for me.
more recently, the kernel was updated to 2.6.20-14. This updates and the one
coming along broke my boot aga
** Attachment added: "collected logs"
http://librarian.launchpad.net/7177647/log_udevd.tgz
--
[feisty] boot stuck in the initramfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103608
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact for Ubuntu.
--
ubunt
I have just tested upgrading to the debian udev package and (beside being
painfull) it completly broked my system.
I think that people here are experiencing two different bugs, as _for_me_
/dev/sd* files are created normally, just with a few seconds of delay, making
mdadm blocked after trying to
It looks more like a crash of the kernel driver for your wifi card...
I have just experienced a similar problem, I will test tomorow if removing
network-manager solves it.
Uneducated guess: if it is "just" a driver problem, blacklisting r8187 should
also solve the problem (I planned to do it but
Indeed, the log you posted looks like a driver problem:
Jan 31 13:39:05 leon-desktop kernel: [ 46.901348] rtl8187: Card successfully
reset
Jan 31 13:39:10 leon-desktop kernel: [ 51.597988] BUG: unable to handle kernel
NULL pointer dereference at virtual address
If blacklisting it solve
ii lvm-common 1.5.20ubuntu11
The Logical Volume Manager for Linux (common
ii lvm2 2.02.06-2ubuntu8
The Linux Logical Volume Manager
ii udev
creating the block devices by hand did not help.
And the major/minor numbers for /dev/sda* are the same in the initramfs as in
my working system.
This looks pretty annoying :/
This initramfs was created in a chroot, the problem may land here ??
My working system is a 64 bit install, while the br
OK, now I have a problem :/
I wanted to recreate the initramfs outside of a 64bit install, so I fired an
edgy desktop CD: it does not support RAID/lvm anymore.
The dapper CD worked fine, I recreated the initramfs. upon reboot, it is still
broken.
The actual problem is that I tryed to add other d
Just to let you know, recreating the RAID array in the same order with
the same options scared me but did work. Everything seems to be "fine",
I am just done playing with it for now, waiting for your analyse of the
initramfs to do more tests. Sorry for tonight's flood :)
--
[feisty] mounting LVM
Today I managed to boot this system again, so here are some updates:
* the mount error (invalid argument) was caused by a missing "-t reiserfs" (or
"-t ext2" for my /boot partition)
* with "break=premount", the raid array has been correctly assembled twice (out
of 4 tries), in which cas the LVM v
There is still a race condition here. I does not attempt to start the
array before detecting devices but it often starts it too early. My 4
devices RAID5 is, most of the time, either not assembled (i.e. 1 or 2
devices out of 4 is not enough) or assembled in degraded mode. An array
should be assembl
The first boot went fine. The next one hanged. And the next one went also fine.
For all of them, I get the message "no devices listed in cinf file were found"
but it looks harmless.
I do not know were the second one hanged so it may be unrelated, but it was
before mounting /
--
initramfs script
>From the changelog of mdadm 2.5.6-7ubuntu4:
Specify --no-degraded argument to mdadm in initramfs; this
can be overridden by setting MD_DEGRADED_ARGS to some nonempty value
(eg, a single space). This ought to fix race problems where RAIDs are
assembled in degraded mode far too
This pretty old bug has only been fixed in the latest version of the nvidia
binary drivers: 1.0-9746, released December 21, 2006.
Installing this version manually solved it for me, both in edgy and in feisty.
Is it any hope to include this version, at least for feisty or is it any other
blocker ?
How is it a bug ?
Installing this package requires some manual intervention, which will be asked
again and again until completed. To get rid of this message you can:
* follow the instructions, it worked fine for me
* remove the sun-java[56]-doc package
If these actions fail, then a bug is present
Public bug reported:
I know that sun does not support linux-ppc. But some of the "sun-
java[56]-*" packages are available (but not installable) on PPC, which
may give some false hope to the users.
Would it be possible to distribute packages of the IBM java for the PPC
architecture ? I have been
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo