I just hit the same... google lead me to
http://www.mydatabasesupport.com/forums/postgresql/359831-general-file-system-level-backup-32bit-64bit.html
which seems to match my use case -- I've moved DB from 32bit box to 64 -- so I
guess that is the reason for me.
Is it the same in your case?
--
Pro
vant I suggest to put high importance on this bug. I would
> have done it myself but cannot see how or am not allowed to.
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
unfortunately yet again bug report is closed with some excuses and
without actually doing a valid resolution of the problem...
here you can find an answer on how problem can actually be solved (many kudos
to C Shore)
http://ubuntuforums.org/showpost.php?p=5042655&postcount=4
And here are the det
ah... nothing to worry about... Debian people have fixed it (as of nfs-utils
1.1.4-1)
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=493059
--
Permission denied when user belongs to group that owns group writable or setgid
directories mounted via nfs
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/110132
You
it-script definitely. If an application crashes, it's usually pretty
> difficult to tell it to clean up after itself. :)
> Will you create a patch for this?
--
.-.
=-- /v\ =
Keep in touch
gt; + I am using 0.7.6-3ubuntu1 from apt
> +
> Did they remove this in newer versions?
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4
ary 2008 16:29:05 Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> > see
> > http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=468382
> > apply patch provided and please verify that it works after...
> That patch won't apply because it's for a significantly different version of
> fail2ban
ill supported for servers, where
> this kind of thing matters?
gy gy -- ask Canonical about that... just teasing ;-) or may be MOTUs?
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973)
t; /var/log/auth.log
> cat /dev/null > /var/log/fail2ban.log
> /etc/init.d/fail2ban restart
> Before you "flush" the auth.log and fail2ban.log, make a copy ;-)
> After that, fail2ban is running wel.
> Best regards
> Michael Schleicher
--
Yaroslav Halch
imepattern))'),
> ('/usr/lib/python2.4/_strptime.py', 425, 'strptime', 'julian =
> datetime_date(year, month, day).toordinal() - \\')]
> and isn't actually starting the process.
> This is in dapper, and not something I think will come up a who
checked the 0.7.6-3 -- indeed it had the bug
but it was fixed later on so debian package is not shipped with it any
longer ;-)
On Wed, 12 Dec 2007, Yaroslav Halchenko wrote:
> I never said 'prior to 0.6'. I said that it is fixed in etch version
> which is 0.7.5-2, where fail
tus: Confirmed => Incomplete
> ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu Dapper)
> Status: Confirmed => Incomplete
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Ph.D. Student CS Dept. NJIT
--
Denial of service through log injection in fail2ban
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/121374
You received this bug
> This seems to allow any non-whitespace characters after , which I
> believe is the nature of the vulnerability described in CVE-2006-6302.
> Please correct me if I'm wrong.
being not anchored at the end of the string is the real reason for such
vulnerability imho
--
Yaro
correct me if I'm wrong.
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in
ed, 12 Dec 2007, Jamie Strandboge wrote:
> Sorry, I didn't give the complete regexes, only the ROOT LOGIN REFUSED
> part.
> Anyway, since these are the Debian package versions, do you know if they
> are indeed affected? Simply put, Ubuntu did not make any changes to
>
rning emails.
> ** Affects: fail2ban (Ubuntu)
> Importance: Undecided
> Assignee: Yaroslav Halchenko (yarikoptic)
> Status: New
> ** Changed in: fail2ban (Ubuntu)
> Assignee: (unassigned) => Yaroslav Halchenko (yarikoptic)
--
Yaroslav Halchen
1-8.deb
> Both are still vulnerable.
> There is a very similar vulnerability reported here:
> http://www.ossec.net/en/attacking-loganalysis.html#fail2ban
> However, I am unsure whether this is specific to fail2ban version 0.8
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psycho
This issue had been closed in 1.0.2-2 in debian unstable (and now event
in testing) -- so might be 1 step away from edgy
--
This extension is incompatible with Firefox 2.0b2
https://launchpad.net/bugs/62759
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailma
it reported empty IP?
so the problem got resolved with newer version of fail2ban (0.6.1-8),
correct?
dapper version is way too oldish...
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax
ve complete backport from next release
propagate into the previous one, especially such elderly one. I would
need to check if there are any specific instructions on that..
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973
designed and organized.
> I hope I was not too hard in my speaking. ( If that the case sorry I
> didn't mean it.)
that is ok -- emails are bad as for describing emotions and intent so I
am trying to take them having positive intent as the base ;-)
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assis
vsftpd is present in the 0.7.x branch of fail2ban and was present in
latest 0.6.x debian releases
--
Lacks support for other programs (VSFTPD)
https://launchpad.net/bugs/66865
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
I am not sure if that is imagezoom extension problem since I remember
having the same issue with another extension.
For me - it opens fine on the 2nd try (after I close that first tiny one
and click on preferences once again) -- could you confirm that it works
for you the same way?
--
Preference
can't confirm - don't experience the same effect.
it might be helpful if you include what versions of firefox/imagezoom you are
experiencing the problem with
(doesn't ubuntu has some standard way to report bugs similar to debian's
reportbug?)
--
Removing mozilla-imagezoom corrupts Firefox's glo
exactly the same issue as for Ben Echols on a Debian system with recent
nvidia drivers. Initially I suspected some racing within systemd, thus
filed (and later closed for now) https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-
bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=945158 which has supporting documentation. Did
not find a workaround ye
Filed a question within nvidia forum:
https://devtalk.nvidia.com/default/topic/1066963/linux/if-laptop-lid-is-
closed-during-suspend-quot-failed-to-set-mode-no-space-left-on-device-
quot-upon-resume/post/5406357/ so far no closure
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
inotify backend had already merged into upstream's master branch post
0.8.6 release but there were no upstream release yet.
There is an issue reported against functionality of this backend:
https://github.com/fail2ban/fail2ban/issues/44
and it would be great if you could give it some testing. I ha
I wonder what was the resolution here -- I am pretty much in 100%
identical situation ;-) so if anyone could comment on -- I would
appreciate!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/66727
Titl
(In reply to comment #3)
> Does debian carry any patches?
yes. See
http://patch-tracker.debian.org/package/xorg-server/2:1.12.3-1
for details
> if so, can you reproduce this with a vanilla X
> server? I just vt-switched about 50 times with 1.12.99.902 but it doesn't
> happen here.
Never happene
(In reply to comment #6)
> yaroslav: could you try reverting the synaptics driver to, say, 1.5.99.902 or
> .903 and test if you can reproduce the crash? A similar crash has been filed
> on
> ubuntu, and there it was discovered that reverting to that version stopped the
> crashes.
yes -- I saw tho
ok -- downgrade to xserver-xorg-input-synaptics 1.5.99.902-1 (debian
package) built with -O0 -- no crashes within a week -- so I guess it is
indeed synaptics to blame. If I find a chance I will "upgrade" to 1.6.0
and see if crash comes back... I would hate to do such silly bisection
but I guess it
I have upgraded xorg server quite a while ago and it had not resolved
the issue at that time. Just for the completness:
/var/log/dpkg.log.1:2012-07-03 09:53:04 status installed xserver-xorg:amd64
1:7.6+13
/var/log/dpkg.log.1:2012-07-03 09:53:04 status installed xorg:amd64 1:7.6+13
/var/log/dpkg.
On Tue, 22 May 2012, Mark Schroeder wrote:
> I'm not sure what you want tested.
I know that polling is guaranteed to work ;) sorry if I wasn't clear
-- I wondered if you could test current development version which
is in git which should use inotify by default (to replace gamin)... but
I guess i
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012, Mark Schroeder wrote:
> I'm a developer and at least aware that there is additional
> complexity to wrap a standard "tar" source into an Ubuntu .deb.
> I see these:
> http://packages.ubuntu.com/precise/fail2ban (standard, ubuntu wrapped)
> https://github.com/fail2ban/fail
ch Updater wrote:
> ** Changed in: pymvpa (Debian)
>Status: New => Fix Released
--
=--=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/
--=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/802110
Title:
Status: New => Invalid
--
=--=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaroslav Halchenko www.ohloh.net/accounts/yarikoptic
--
You received this bug notification because you are a membe
oy -- we are still ok in Debian, phew
On Tue, 15 Feb 2011, Michael Vogt wrote:
> Public bug reported:
is public also fixes them in Ubuntu?
--
=--=
Keep in touch www.onerussian.com
Yaros
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 695351 ***
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/695351
Hint: get recent package of pymvpa in 0.4.x series pre-built for Ubuntus
on http://neuro.debian.net
Enjoy
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Public bug reported:
If you visit https://popcon.ubuntu.com/ and download "universe"
(https://popcon.ubuntu.com/universe/by_inst.gz) and "unknown"
(https://popcon.ubuntu.com/unknown/by_inst) you will see that many
packages which are in universe (e.g., git-annex) are not present in
"universe" but
regarding the original issue + NB: additional point of information:
$> zgrep neurodebian-popularity-contest by_inst*
by_inst:14151 neurodebian-popularity-contest 726 341 1 681
(Neurodebian Team)
by_inst_ubuntu_unknown.gz:18478 neurodebian-popularity-contest 1326
41 matches
Mail list logo
