> Fair enough, although I might wait for tomorrow given the debian one has
> worse
> issues.
what worse issues? let me know -- I will have it fixed ;-)
> However, if the dapper one has real security issues shouldn't it be
> updated there at some stage, given it's still supported for servers, where
> this kind of thing matters?
gy gy -- ask Canonical about that... just teasing ;-) or may be MOTUs?
--
Yaroslav Halchenko
Research Assistant, Psychology Department, Rutgers-Newark
Student Ph.D. @ CS Dept. NJIT
Office: (973) 353-5440x263 | FWD: 82823 | Fax: (973) 353-1171
101 Warren Str, Smith Hall, Rm 4-105, Newark NJ 07102
WWW: http://www.linkedin.com/in/yarik
--
fail2ban doesn't handle leap years
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/196854
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing list
ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com
https://lists.ubuntu.com/mailman/listinfo/ubuntu-bugs
