Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gnome-terminal
In gnome-terminal could not get keyboard shortcuts to accept changes. Changes
are ignored.
My fix was to edit using gconf-editor. Change /apps/gnome-terminal/keybindings
and change the fields there (copy, paste was all I wanted to chang
My bad.
In Ubuntu 7.04 to change the keyboard shortcut for Action Copy you can click on
the word "Copy" and it asks for the new shortcut. In Ubuntu 8.10 if you click
on "Copy" nothing. I finally discovered that now the user cannot click on
"Copy" but must click on the shortcut key field. The
I'm getting this error in 7.10 Beta
It is not consistent.
I can add items like Applications -> Accessories -> File Browser
and it works. The menu shows it.
But I cannot add Applications -> System Tools.
Not as root, as system admin, as terminal running "sudo alacarte".
It seems to allow executabl
Public bug reported:
Just downloaded and tried the 7.10 Beta Live CD desktop i386
My Dell-Ubuntu E520n has only a USB keyboard. The boot menu ignores the
keyboard until X loads.
SuSE 10.2 and Mandravia 2007 have this problem.
For some good clues see Mandriva threads:
http://mandrivausers.org/ind
This error is in 7.10 final as well.
See this forum post
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=604877
My work-around was editing out a line in
/etc/xdg/menus/applications.menu
This a bug in the logic of nesting files for local and global controls.
Alacarte is Broken as it currently is released.
Confirming the error is still there in 7.10 final release
The error also occurs for users that ARE in the "admin" group.
--
menu editor won't accept changes
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/96706
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is the bug contact f
OK I've learned it's not a bug but a feature!
You cannot add a menu so you can turn on the items under the menu without first
turning on at least one of the items under the menu. Or in my specific case to
turn on the System Tools menu I must first turn on an item in that menu (i.e.
Root Terminal
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 10.04 RC
System has two hard drives. 15 partitions on SATA 1TB drive. 12 partitions on
ATA/IDE 120GB drive.
Each boot U1004RC assigns random drive letters. 1TB to sda or maybe 1TB to sdb.
My large Data partition on sda5 shows as sdb5 often, about 30% of the time on
** Attachment added: "fstab"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/45329046/fstab
--
10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mai
Thanks Dave.
I'm attaching fstab. I am using only UUID since seeing this issue. 10 boots
found my /Data on sda 6 times sdb 4 times.
In rc.local I have:
# Spins down the sdb drive - to be quieter and save energy
hdparm -y /dev/sdb
That is now broken. I will write a script that finds /Data then
I'm using totally UUID for fstab etc. No issues there for me.
I learned how to use script commands like:
tune2fs -c -1 -i 3m -L 1TB_09
/dev/disk/by-uuid/dd6032a7-02ec-4b78-afff-8c5795345667
where before I used:
tune2fs -c -1 -i 3m -L 1TB_09 /dev/sda9
To spin down the second drive for energy and
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: ubiquity
When installing Ubuntu 10.04 Beta 1 to /dev/sda11 using [Advanced] to select
the location for GRUB the drill down shows/offers all the partitions, but when
clicking on the drill down list for /dev/sda11 the text box remains /dev/sda it
does no
OUCH!
Now that partition will no longer boot.
I used Synaptic to add the ppa, saw the new version for mountall and installed
it.
Before reboot I ran the mountall --debug command. Do you want all 288 lines?
the last line was "mountpoint_ready: /" Want a grep filter of it? I edited
out all but
OK Scott
It's on the attachment I hope.
Reviewing /etc/fstab to try to get it to boot again I saw I had swap sdb2
commented out at the time.
** Attachment added: "mountall.log before new mountall"
http://launchpadlibrarian.net/5757/mountall.log
--
mountall does not mount all swap partit
grub2 CAN boot when installed on other than first partition.
I'm doing exactly that. It works fine installed to my sda7.
This bug is about not being able to install and boot on sdb7.
** Summary changed:
- grub2 not properly installed when using other-than-first partition on a drive
+ grub2 canno
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: grub2
Ubuntu 9.10 Beta on a Dell E520N desktop
grub2 installs to hd0
grub2 can boot partitions on hd0 when installed to hd0 (i.e. sda5 works fine)
grub2 dies like a brick when Ubuntu 9.10 is installed to a partition on hd1
Super Grub Disk cannot recover
Public bug reported:
Ubuntu 9.10 Beta
Two swap partitions sda2 and sdb2
Only one gets mounted at boot, sdb2
swapon /dev/sdb2 --- shows mounted
swapon /dev/sda2 --- mounts second swap
Ubuntu 9.04 always mounted both no problem
If I comment out sdb2 in /etc/fstab then sda2 gets mounted OK.
So it see
Same problem with 9.10 RC.
Installed to sdb6 --- cannot boot PC.
Fix was to install again the second time to sda7 and now it can boot
--
grub2 cannot boot when installed on sdb (hdb1)
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/441907
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Installed 9.10 RC
Both swap partitions are used (sda2 and sdb2 each 2GB)
:)
--
mountall does not mount all swap partitions
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/435027
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bugs mailing lis
My observation:
When I install Ubuntu 9.10 (Grub2) to hdb the PC cannot boot. The bios goes to
the first grub line, maybe it's "Grub Loading" and dies. The bios lets me
choose which hard drive I boot from. If I tell the bios to boot from hdb then
I get an old grub legacy menu.
My conclusion i
Thank you Alex Burfee (joop-wow)
I've had this bug since gnome3/unity 11.04. In 12.04 beta 1 there is a new
version of gpointing-device-settings 1.5.1-6 and the bug is still there.
Thanks to Alex I have a fix - I posted it in ubuntuforums:
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1941067
basicall
** Tags added: apport-collected
** Description changed:
Ubuntu 10.04 RC
System has two hard drives. 15 partitions on SATA 1TB drive. 12 partitions
on ATA/IDE 120GB drive.
Each boot U1004RC assigns random drive letters. 1TB to sda or maybe 1TB to
sdb.
My large Data partition on sda5 s
Hi Jeremy,
I don't mind helping, but I'm at the level I need much more detailed
instructions.
I didn't see how to use your links.
I have 10.10 and installed and booted kernel 2.6.37-rc2.
The problem still exists.
I did not see where to download a 11.04 alpha version. If you want me
to test tha
OK - more tests
I downloaded 11.04 alpha 1 from
http://www.ubuntu.com/testing/natty/alpha1
Date stamp is Dec 3.
Kernel is 2.6.37-7-generic
Bug persists - random assignment of drives as sda or sdb
(unity will be interesting - gets to desktop fast)
--
You received this bug notification because you
Follow up observations patch applied on 11-30 (post #140)
This is for a remote PC I connect to via VNC over SSH. tightvnc. I don't see
it often. Today was first time in 3 weeks. User has trouble getting photos
from camera.
Initial cpu load around 30% - things look good.
PC uptime is 2 hours -
I'm fighting this bug too.
Tried the fix in #85 but bug came back again.
So I'm back here again.
Tried the fix of uncheck "remember-numlock-state"
cpu load dropped from > 5.0 to under 1.0 and system seems fine now.
Could be a hardware issue. The user has a replacement keyboard. Don't know
what s
Just used synaptic package manager to download and install
cups (1.5.3-0ubuntu3)
in Ubuntu 12.04
Now my Canon i560 prints full page again.
Thank You!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/103
Another test: Canon i560 still working for me with ...4
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1032456
Title:
Canon inkjets (and some other printers) print only half of the last
page after
Bug affects me in Gnome Classic (No Effects)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781931
Title:
New windows are moved to front but don't take focus
To manage notifications about this bug g
Should mention Ubuntu 12.04 - 64 bit - all updates I've seen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/781931
Title:
New windows are moved to front but don't take focus
To manage notifications
Thanks Jeffery,
The edit in post #3 is working here.
I used chmod to the .so file then let my user ID edit the file and chmod back
to 644.
For some reason Okteta as root was slow slow slow.
As a test I booted to an older partition with Ubuntu 12.04. Started Firefox -
no bug file on desktop. Ran
I just installed the i386 ...06 deb on a friend's PC with the problem.
Before the install cpu load was like 6.x or 7.x now it's like 0.3
Hope the bug stays dead.
Thanks for the package.
Will post back only if the bug returns.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Affects me too on Ubuntu 11.10
and on Fedora 16
After reboot settings are ignored
Hack:
Open settings - turn off wheel emulation
close settings
Open settings - turn on wheel emulation
Then it's working again --- until the next reboot. :(
--
You received this bug notification because you are a me
Hi Fabio,
I'm using Ubuntu 10.10 now. I still use UUID like I explained before like #5
above.
For a test in Ubuntu 10.10 I rebooted the PC 10 times and checked $ df
/dev/sda - 4 times
/dev/sdb - 6 times
On my PC /dev/sda is more likely after a cold boot after the hard drives have
stopped spinnin
My explanation looks fuzzy.
I was checking in df to see which drive / root was on.
--
10.04RC system boot random assignment of sda, sdb
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/569645
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
--
ubuntu-bug
me too!
I vote for having Synaptics automatically install qcad-data with qcad so
dimension lines can be displayed.
I installed qcad in April so maybe this is already fixed. I just used qcad on
Ubuntu 10.04 for the first time and the problem showed up. I downloaded
qcad-data and the dimensions
36 matches
Mail list logo