Hello,
I just wanted to put in here that a user tried using mdadm to no success
where dmraid worked[0]. As this is a package that you may need in order
to boot (if fakeraid is supporting your boot drive), I think it's unwise
to simply remove completely. It would feel bad not seeing your system
boo
For now, I say let's keep it in.
Maybe downgrade to universe until more confidence that mdadm (or another
tool) covers the fakeraid scenarios users might be using.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu Oracular)
Status: Confirmed => Fix Committed
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2047303
Title:
Partitions on dmraid managed array are not mounted, sys
** Also affects: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: bcache-tool
I think this is still an issue in Jammy but haven't tested yet. I'll set
to new just for now and re-evaluate later.
** Changed in: bcache-tools (Ubuntu Jammy)
Status: Triaged => New
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubunt
Hello, and thank you for making this bug report.
Unfortunately the error message isn't terribly helpful.
dpkg: error processing package php7.4-common (--configure):
installed php7.4-common package post-installation script subprocess returned
error exit status 10
Is php not working after the up
Interesting. Glad to see the segfault is resolved, but that's not
friendly with the assertion failure. Please keep us posted!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076191
Title:
gpsmon cras
Thanks Gabriel. I agree with Sergio, let's wait for comment from
upstream.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2076173
Title:
cannot display sensor name when its owner is lun1
To manage n
If someone wants to do the SRU process for Noble/Jammy, feel free to go
ahead. I have a few other tasks on my plate before I can start on it.
** Changed in: dmraid (Ubuntu Oracular)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Thank you for making this bug report YunQiang!
I unfortunately do not have a risc-v system to test this out on.
Was this ssh working before and it was a recent regression? Does the
connection fail immediately or does it time out?
I see we have a version of openssh in the -proposed pocket
`1:9.6p
I just checked trying to apply those patches. I was able to apply the
following on top of jammy-devel:
113d8f4e95 s390x: pv: Add dump support
1af0006ab9 dump: Replace opaque DumpState pointer with a typed one
9b72224f44 dump: Add architecture section and section string table support
13fd417ddc dum
Apologies on late reply, I got busy and was waiting to see if there were
any new revelations regarding this bug.
Andres, Ninoy, did you find anything new or have you been using the
respective workaround you mentioned lately?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt
Thanks Utkarsh. I'll take the SRU.
** Changed in: gdisk (Ubuntu Focal)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
** Changed in: gdisk (Ubuntu Jammy)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
** Changed in: gdisk (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: Tr
** Also affects: gdisk (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Changed in: gdisk (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: New => Fix Committed
** Changed in: gdisk (Ubuntu Noble)
Status: Fix Committed => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a memb
** Changed in: libmail-dmarc-perl (Ubuntu)
Assignee: Utkarsh Gupta (utkarsh) => Mitchell Dzurick (mitchdz)
** Summary changed:
- Merge libmail-dmarc-perl from Debian unstable for oracular
+ [FFE] Merge libmail-dmarc-perl from Debian unstable for oracular
--
You received this
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/gdisk/+git/gdisk/+merge/471744
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2039594
Title:
sgdisk - Unexpected Behav
** Description changed:
- When using the sgdisk command to create a new partition with a specified
- size, the tool behaves unexpectedly when a size is specified with a
- decimal point. Specifically, using a size like 7.5G results in the
- partition size being set to 3.5 KiB instead.
+ [ Impact ]
** Description changed:
- [ Impact ]
+ [ Impact ]
When creating a partition with sgdisk, if you provide a decimal input it will
be incorrectly interpreted. For example, putting in the command
sgdisk --new=1:0:+7.5G --typecode=1:8300 ./a.img to create a 7.5G partition,
the tool will actual
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/libmail-dmarc-perl/+git/libmail-dmarc-perl/+merge/471764
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064417
Title:
The Jammy SRU was easy to make, validate, and run dep8 on.
Focal is having a strange issue where i386 can not install gdisk[0] I
haven't been able to figure out yet.
[0] - https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-focal-mitchdz-
lp2039594-gdisk-decimal/focal/i386/g/gdisk/20240821_190457_
** Description changed:
+ [ Impact ]
+ There are no dep8 tests in this package. In addition, the debian/watch file
is not working correctly which is corrected in this bug.
+
+ [ Test Plan ]
+ (1) The new dep8 tests pass
+ (2) the new debian/watch pulls the correct file. e.g. running the followin
Public bug reported:
Remove this package from Oracular.
We provide a solution for hotplugging[0] and this package is currently
undergoing a lot of development work, so should be included once more
stable. If we keep it in, it's almost guaranteed SRUs will be needed.
[0] - https://documentation.u
I just want to make it clear - the noble package should stay in
proposed. There is no need to create an unnecessary update for the users
for dep8 test additions and an update to debian/watch. This can be
included in a bug update or security update.
--
You received this bug notification because yo
** Description changed:
- Remove this package from Oracular.
+ Remove amazon-ec2-net-utils from Oracular.
- We provide a solution for hotplugging[0] and this package is currently
- undergoing a lot of development work, so should be included once more
- stable. If we keep it in, it's almost guar
** Description changed:
Remove amazon-ec2-net-utils from Oracular.
We provide a solution for hotplugging[0] which is enabled by default
with no user interaction. This package can conflict with our default
- method
+ method.
In additon to this, this package is currently undergoing a d
** Description changed:
- Scheduled-For: Backlog
- Upstream: tbd
- Debian: 1.20230215-1
- Ubuntu: 1.20230215-1ubuntu1
+ [ FFE ]
+ This is a new release of libmail-dmarc-perl. Our Ubuntu delta from the
+ previous version applies on-top of it without any modifications.
- There is nothi
Thanks Douglas, I'm not sure if the download link did something weird,
but when I tried to download your link, it wasn't a proper core dump.
# file _usr_bin_clamscan.1000.crash
_usr_bin_clamscan.1000.crash: ASCII text, with very long lines (43521)
Which means I can't run it through a debugger. Co
Great to hear back from you Mario.
I'd suggest opening an upstream bug for the reconnect issue.
Regarding the assertion error, I wasn't able to immediately pin down the
commit that would fix that. Happen to have a commit you'd like me to try
to add to the PPA?
--
You received this bug notificat
ecot/+git/dovecot/+merge/471949
** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Noble)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Oracular)
Importance: Undecided
Status: Confirmed
** Changed in: dovecot (Ubuntu Oracular)
Assignee: (unassigned) => Mitchell Dzur
I'll look into Noble to see if the CVE fixes can be cherry-picked.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077324
Title:
2.3.21.1 released mitigating CVE-2024-23184/CVE-2024-23185
To manage
** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Focal)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Jammy)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
** Also affects: dovecot (Ubuntu Bionic)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification beca
Yes, All versions in our archive are affected. Below I have the openwall
message and extracted the corresponding commits needed to address each
CVE.
* CVE-2024-23184 (https://www.openwall.com/lists/oss-security/2024/08/15/3)
-
https://github.com/dovecot/core/commit/f8b5e476dce314ea3f557330eeaa9c5
Hi Hadmut, yes I agree. Unfortunately it's a bit easier to modify this
bug than the ubuntu release ugprade message, hence why the message in
the upgrader is so sparse. The hopeful plan is to have a nice wiki page
to redirect to.
I'm working on a good alternative upgrade path that we can rely on fo
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.launchpad.net/~mitchdz/ubuntu/+source/dovecot/+git/dovecot/+merge/472010
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077324
Title:
2.3.21.1 released mit
** Summary changed:
- 2.3.21.1 released mitigating CVE-2024-23184/CVE-2024-23185
+ [FFE] CVE-2024-23184/CVE-2024-23185
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2077324
Title:
[FFE] CVE-2024-23
** Description changed:
- There is a new minor/security patch for Dovecot, to mitigate the two DoS
- vulnerabilities. The fix should be merged into the supported Ubuntu
- version packages.
+ [ Impact ]
+
+ - CVE-2024-23184: A large number of address headers in email resulted
+ in excessive CPU
Closing this ticket as not needed anymore. Feel free to open again if
this functionality is needed.
** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Fix Released
** Changed in: webkit2gtk (Ubuntu Focal)
Status: In Progress => Won't Fix
--
You received this bug notification becaus
** Changed in: cloud-images
Status: New => Fix Released
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1941785
Title:
ec2-hibinit-agent: Add support for IMDSv2
To manage notifications about t
Closing this for Focal, since I do not have the hardware to test this.
If you need this feature for Focal and have the hardware to test, please
re-open this bug.
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix Released => Won't Fix
** Changed in: samba (Ubuntu)
Status: Won't Fix => Fix C
One additional note - The fix for this is available in Focal in the
-proposed pocket.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2046994
Title:
Spotlight search function broken with macOS Ventura
Also fixing kpartx-boot, new initramfs test, systemd socket/service
handling. All WIP.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645
Title:
Oracular migration issues
To manage notifications
I added that changelog entry due to v3.9.23 making that change[0].
Before pushing, I would like to remove that changelog entry as to not
cause any confusion, but will wait for the rest of the review in-case
some more changes are needed.
[0] - https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-server/releases/t
Thanks for the question Andreas,
Looking into this, I noticed the defaults are already 65536!
root@j:~# dpkg -s rabbitmq-server | grep Version
Version: 3.9.13-1ubuntu0.22.04.2
root@j:~# cat /proc/$(pgrep -f rabbitmq)/limits | grep "Max open files"
Max open files655366
One more thing I'd like to have a discussion on - if rabbitmq-server's
database has open queues, they will be lost on upgrade. This is already
the current behavior, and I assume this is fine, but I'd like to at the
very least bring it up.
For example, if you open up an lxc shell, and run the new h
I'm considering removing the kpartx-boot split. This will take a bit of
testing to be thorough to account for no regressions.
If multipath-tools failing in -proposed is blocking your package please
contact me and I can expedite the testing to get this package through
without that change.
--
You
Andreas, got it. I'll update the section about the file handle limit
change as well. Want me to just update the MP I already have up? Or
should I make a new MP?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Regarding comment #10 I was planning on documenting the need to set the
environment variable, but didn't consider having systemd export the
variable, which I really like that idea.
I'll test and include that change in my MP soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of
https://github.com/rabbitmq/rabbitmq-management/pull/748
In the comment chain:
> As this wasn't a documented feature, I didn't think that it could be
> considered a breaking change. Let's discuss privately re PCF. I am not aware
> of anyone other than us using this feature.
--
You received thi
I'll see if I can find evidence that it was used by many people, but it
doesn't seem like there was a lot of blowing up in the pull request
after it was merged.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
Thanks for the discussion thermoman and ekomc.
thermoman, are your machines identically set up? Is it just a single
machine that is experiencing this issue, or a few out of your fleet?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
h
The init scripts should probably be removed in favor of the systemd
scripts.
Jacob, just to confirm, the fix requires 2 things that we know of so far:
1. removing the init script
2. applying the upstream patch to error check unbind_tree[0]
Or is it JUST removing the init script that alleviates th
Thanks Cesar, I'll change this to incomplete in-case other people are
encountering similar issues. Please comment on this bug again if it
becomes an issue, although with that said I don't know how often you
would be reinstalling mysql for fun.
** Changed in: mysql-8.0 (Ubuntu)
Status: Fix R
Thank you for taking the time to make this bug report Markus!
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324
Title:
vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
To manage notifications
What version of Ubuntu are you seeing this bug on? Unfortunately
upstream/debian has been pretty dormant for a while, in-fact we are
ahead of debian right now, so it may make sense to apply this patch.
Unfortunately it looks like even upstream does not have this patch
applied.
--
You received th
Thank you for taking the time to make this bug Alfonso!
I can reproduce this in a noble-vm very easily.
$ lxc launch ubuntu:noble n-vm --vm
$ lxc shell n-vm
# rm /etc/ssh/sshd_config.d/60-cloudimg-settings.conf
# sed -i 's/#PermitRootLogin prohibit-password/PermitRootLogin yes/'
/etc/ssh/sshd_co
Just for fun, I also tried the latest openssh-client that we have in
Jammy and see it works too -
# wget
https://launchpad.net/ubuntu/+archive/primary/+files/openssh-client_8.9p1-3ubuntu0.7_amd64.deb
# dpkg -i ./openssh-client_8.9p1-3ubuntu0.7_amd64.deb
# scp
root@localhost:/sys/firmware/efi/efi
To be complete, I also tried openssh-server_9.3p1-1ubuntu3.3 and see
this issue on noble.
Which leaves something changed between openssh-client 8.9 and 9.3 to
cause this behavior.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https:
Markus, if I were to create a PPA with this patch applied, would you be
willing to help test that out?
** Changed in: vsftpd (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad
** Changed in: openssh (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Triaged
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069305
Title:
scp fails to copy files from sysfs
To manage notifications about this bug
Andres,
Thanks a lot for chiming in. It's always good data to see multiple
people hitting this issue to help narrow things down.
> but if I have to narrow it down, I'd say it happens when umounting/mounting a
> disk.
And performing a sudo multipath -F cleans up this connections (at least most of
Andres,
Thanks for being willing to help out! Let me see if there is some easy
way to profile multipath-tools, I'll get back to you on that.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286
Titl
I'm investigating the jammy MRE - specifically on the addition of
ERL_MAX_PORTS. I'm not a fan of the ideas I have so far. The concern is
that a user may have increased the cap, and on upgrade would silently
cap, which could cause failures.
This of course will be documented in the d/changelog, but
** Tags removed: verification-needed verification-needed-done
** Tags added: verification-done-noble
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999
Title:
enable hibernation on ARM
To manage
Markus, would you mind making a bug report upstream to see if this could
be included?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324
Title:
vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
As per the previous comment - I will do some research in v3.9.22 for
Jammy, ensuring that no bugs are introduced there that is fixed in a
more recent version, and proceed to do the MRE for that version instead.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which i
Andres, Apologies for the delay.
It looks like the default solution is simply using perf, which I can
help setup, but the problem is that perf logs a ton of info. The perf
logs will balloon in size substantially. How often does this issue occur
for you? If it does not happen frequently then I'd no
I did 3 runs pre/post patch and recorded the data in the attached file.
Post-patch means using my PPA from [0].
I had to set up these systems in a different AWS region. I chose eu-
west-1 simply because it supports the AWS a1.metal instance type which
is the first graviton instance. I set these s
Thanks Chris.
I'm setting up a Graviton system (ARMv8.0) in a different AWS region,
since my old region doesn't support it. Results coming soon.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2024019
I'm still planning to do this, but haven't finished the paperwork just
yet, mainly want to investigate the security side of things. Apologies
on the delays.
** Tags removed: server-todo
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
Removing server-todo. I still plan to look at this, but it is a lower
priority item for me, please let me know if this is a bigger issue that
needs addressing, but to me it looks like there is a workaround in place
so it is not critical to fix ASAP.
I also worry the fix for this will be messing wi
Markus, if we prepare a package with the patch, would you be willing to
help out testing the patch?
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324
Title:
vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_ex
No need to worry Cesar - thank you for your contributions, we really
appreciate it.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069080
Title:
package mysql-server-8.0 8.0.37-0ubuntu0.24.04.1 fail
I prepared a v3.9.22 in Jammy and have ran the autopkgtest, I am seeing
a failure[0] with the new rpc test in ppc64el. I re-ran it twice so far
with the same timeout, and waiting for a third run to see the results.
The logs unfortunately do not have a lot of useful information, so I'm
hoping it's
FWIW, I did see the same thing when I did my original merge, where
ppc54el timed out for rpc[0] and then when I re-ran it, it passed[1].
[0] -
https://autopkgtest.ubuntu.com/results/autopkgtest-jammy-mitchdz-rabbitmq-server-mre-2204/jammy/ppc64el/r/rabbitmq-server/20240516_012945_a4e10@/log.gz
[1
** Tags added: verification-done
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066999
Title:
enable hibernation on ARM
To manage notifications about this bug go to:
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubun
The following packages have been tested on amd64 to ensure no
regressions:
* 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.24.04.1
* 1.0.0-0ubuntu16.23.10.1
* 1.0.0-0ubuntu11.22.04.5
* 1.0.0-0ubuntu9.6
The process is the same for each release, but shown below is the example
for noble.
1) Launch instance
Example of how to sta
Right now I'm working on getting access to testflinger systems to
confirm that it is indeed okay to remove kpartx-boot binary package
splitting.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645
T
Thanks Andres, that is very helpful information. Let me know if there's
anything I can do to help out.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286
Title:
Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU u
Attached is the detailed test results. No significant performance
regression is seen in ARMv8.0, and a significant improvement in STREX
events are seen in ARMv8.1, which makes me happy to verify the proposed
package.
Test result summary:
Package tested: nginx 1.18.0-0ubuntu1.5
[ARMv8.0]
STREX EV
Public bug reported:
The latest version is version 1.5.19 released 2023-09-20. The download
is available at [0].
[0] - https://s3.amazonaws.com/ec2-downloads/
** Affects: ec2-ami-tools (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
You received this bug notification because you ar
Debian has a new version - 0.9.8-1 so I will also update to the new
version.
** Tags added: needs-merge
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2068645
Title:
Oracular migration issues
To ma
I wonder if we can just move the udev rules for bcache to be higher than
multipath-tools, so mpath runs first?
I can test this on a smalle-scale, but I worry there could be negative
ramifications to simply moving udev rules around. @Jerzy, would there be
a system available to test the changes once
Thanks Markus, I'll make a PPA for that right now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324
Title:
vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD when pam_exec.so is used
To manage notifications about this
Just kicked off a build at [0].
[0] - https://launchpad.net/~mitchdz/+archive/ubuntu/lp2069324-vsftpd-
sigchld
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2069324
Title:
vsftpd hangs with SIGCHLD
Finally got my hands on a ppc64el system. Running the rpc test manually
now.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248
Title:
MRE updates of rabbitmq-server for Jammy,Focal
To manage no
Okay, manually ran the rpc test on a ppc64el system and it passed fine.
Ran on bobonevm4
$ dpkg -s rabbitmq-server | grep Version:
Version: 3.9.22-0ubuntu0.1~jammy1
$ python3 rpc_server.py &
[1] 5069
$ client_result=$(python3 rpc_client.py)
[.] fib(30)
$ echo $client_result
[x] Requesting fib(3
Okay quick response - this time the dep8 test passed in the LP
runners[0].
3 dep8 test failures in a row seems fishy though, so I'd like to run the
test a few more times to see if it is really flaky, or if the runners
were just sad on the previous runs. Will run 2 more tests now.
[0] - https://au
While waiting for the new autopkgtest to publish and run, I am going to
attempt to kick off the upstream CI/CD tests for 3.9.22.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060248
Title:
MRE upda
@hjd, thanks for adding a tag, are you planning on working on this
merge? I was going to take it, but feel free if you are interested :)
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2070537
Title:
Thanks for the confirmation axino.
I would like to read up on the bcache-tools udev rules and see if
there's anything historically blocking moving them later in the boot
cycle, but if all checks out I'd be glad to make a PPA and do as much
testing as I reasonably can.
This will take a bit of rese
Any luck narrowing down the issue more Andres?
Thanks for the remedy steps Ninoy.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2066286
Title:
Multipath 0.8.8 reports High CPU usage when having Lun
Attached an MP, still a work in progress, but passed all autopkgtest
locally. Will kick off the autopkgtest against the PPA once it is
published. I also plan to do some more testing with testflinger
tomorrow, especially around the removal of kpartx-boot.
** Merge proposal linked:
https://code.
I'm working on the oracular multipath-tools merge right now, and there
are some udev changes there. Once that gets in -proposed I'll test this
issue again in Oracular and try to fix it there first.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed
Real,
Is there more steps you took to configure the system? I'm not able to
reproduce the issue. Here's the steps I took to attempt a reproduction.
$ lxc launch ubuntu:noble n
$ lxc shell n
# apt update -y && apt upgrade -y
# echo "auth sufficient pam_radius_auth.so" >> /etc/pam.d/sudo
# echo "us
Right now there is nothing to do since we up to date with Debian.
If we want to update it, we will need to either wait to see if Debian
updates during OO development, or pull from upstream which does publish
deb files.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs
Public bug reported:
Upstream: 3.26.1
Debian: 1:3.26.1-2~exp2
Ubuntu: 1:3.26.1-1build1
This merge is has the fix for
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2060745 that will let noble
out of proposed.
** Affects: nbd (Ubuntu)
Importance: Undecided
Status: New
--
Yo
Thanks Andreas!
Regarding comment #3
a) debian version has this fix, and quite a few updates to the debian/*
directory, so I think we might as well do an early oracular merge to get
that fix in.
B) I'm curious why the excuses page didn't pick up those autopkgtests
during the sync?
--
You recei
I didn't see a bug to track the Oracular merge, so I made it here
https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/nbd/+bug/2064688
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2060745
Title:
nbd-client f
Whoops, the fix is in debian experimental, we might need to wait for a
new unstable release to happen.
--
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/2064688
Title:
Merge nbd from Debian unstable for
Thank you for the response Nigel!
> Looks like a false alarm
Would you like to close this bug then?
I'm also curious how often this issue occurs, maybe the maintainer
script should be improved to check for port availability before
attempting to start the unit.
--
You received this bug notifica
301 - 400 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
