I don't believe it attracted any attention, other than me marking it as
confirmed. However, I haven't been using Ubuntu recently, so I can't
100% confirm. But I believe there is still no virtual package for linux-
ubuntu-modules, so there is no simple, automatic way to ensure these
extra modules ar
Hi Ben,
I've encountered the same problem with the radio hotkey not being recognised
(although I use ndiswrapper not b43). I believe this occurs if the device is
not active during boot, it appears as though X (which controls inputs such as
this) does not realise the key should do anything unles
Hi Ben,
I've encountered the same problem with the radio hotkey not being recognised
(although I use ndiswrapper not b43). I believe this occurs if the device is
not active during boot, it appears as though X (which controls inputs such as
this) does not realise the key should do anything unles
Public bug reported:
Binary package hint: gparted
The message above appears in /var/log/messages whenever GParted is
scanning drives. It appears to be harmless but it seems like something
someone should be made aware of.
This was using Hardy AMD64,
Steps to reproduce:
Run,
tail -f /var/log/mess
Public bug reported:
Followed the recent upgrade to linux-image-2.6.24-18-generic, when this
was installed, linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-18-generic was not installed
as a dependency (as would be expected). As a result ndiswrapper (the
most noticeable as it meant wireless was missing) was not availa
Still present with 2.6.24-19. Perhaps the linux-ubuntu-modules meta-
package should be restored, then this package could be updated at the
same time as linux-image, linux-headers, linux-restricted-modules, etc
etc.
--
linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-18-generic did not automatically update.
https://bu
Marking this confirmed.
** Changed in: linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Confirmed
--
linux-ubuntu-modules-2.6.24-18-generic did not automatically update.
https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/237311
You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu
Bugs, w
Agreed, I tend to recommend adding scripts to /etc/rc.local, as it is a
touch simpler, however creating a new init script is equally valid. This
bug is due to the initramd set up that Ubuntu uses, as explained in my
earlier post. For update-initramfs to actually do anything, it needs a
change in co
This issue is still present in 2.6.27-2-generic. I've attached some test
output (removing ndiswrapper, loading ssb then reloading ndiswrapper)
which shows the device being claimed by the ssb module.
As an aside, it appears that the module `pcspkr' has been compiled into
this kernel. I tend to disa
It appears I hadn't posted my earlier findings on this bug report
either.
At least in my case, ssb was part of the initrd by default due to a
desire for eth0 to be up immediately (presumably for a network boot, if
desired). This requires b44 to be in the initrd which in turn requires
ssb to be loa
Public bug reported:
Installed Hardy Release Candidate AMD64 from LiveCD.
Upon reboot, had to manually add:
deb http://au.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy main restricted
deb-src http://au.archive.ubuntu.com/ubuntu/ hardy main restricted
To /etc/apt/sources.list, the lines weren't even there com
Hmm... didn't keep any of the logs from the LiveCD. Attempted to
reproduce, but everything worked correctly. Can include the original
sources.list, however I don't think it'll be much help by itself. The
file was exactly the same as normal, except the hardy-updates section
was where the hardy secti
Unfortunately I didn't keep any of the logs from the first install. I
didn't actually diagnose what the issue was for a few days (I eventually
clicked as to why basic things I expected to be in the repositories
weren't showing up). Even more unfortunately, the bug did not reoccur
during my second (
Confirmed on 8.04 final. Once again dependent on theme.
The program 'xfce4-mixer-plugin' received an X Window System error.
This probably reflects a bug in the program.
The error was 'BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)'.
(Details: serial 198 error_code 11 request_code 53 minor_code
Public bug reported:
System: (X)Ubuntu Gutsy AMD64.
Upgrading xfce4-notes-plugin to 1.6.1-1ubuntu1~gutsy+ppa1, causes
existing notes to no longer display.
Can still see entries for old notes in ~/.config/xfce4/panel/notes.rc,
however these are not displayed by the panel plugin.
** Affects: xfce
Apologies, I downgraded the package, then attempted to replicate by
upgrading again, only to find the issue had vanished. No idea what
happened.
** Changed in: xfwm4 (Ubuntu)
Status: New => Invalid
--
xfwm4-4.4.2-1ubuntu3~gutsy+ppa won't use "super" as modifier.
https://bugs.launchpad.net
You are probably correct in voiding this, given the linux-ubuntu-modules
package doesn't appear to exist anymore (at least I couldn't see it
browsing the web package list). Can you tell me if Ubuntu still ships a
pre-built ndiswrapper module, and if so what package it's contained in?
--
linux-ubu
17 matches
Mail list logo
