[Bug 377060] Re: [jaunty karmic] espeak missing words and phonemes from sentences

2009-06-06 Thread David Sugar
This ties into the larger issue of untangling audio in Ubuntu. The latest release of portaudio has some problems with the alsa & pulse backend, and this is what breaks espeak. But what to do? We can compile espeak natively to use pulse rather than using portaudio, but until/unless pulse becomes

[Bug 27463] Re: [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server for Ubuntu

2009-06-28 Thread David Sugar
I am going to fill the ppa with at least initial packages based on the original ones from Timothy starting tomorrow evening. At least it will let people test them. If we get this into Debian first, then it could get into Karmic as a merge request. -- [needs-packaging] Fedora Directory Server fo

[Bug 342637] Re: [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch

2009-04-30 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress -- [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com h

[Bug 361827] Re: Obsolete version with broken zrtp support

2009-04-18 Thread David Sugar
ZRTP actually operates as if it were a "plugin" in Twinkle; the associated libraries are dloaded rather than directly linked, and this happens only when Twinkle has ZRTP activated. This happens in the "User Profile" settings under security tab. There is additional ui elements that exists in Twink

[Bug 228299] Re: libvirt-bin with QEMU ignores KQEMU

2009-04-29 Thread David Sugar
Morten, this issue had confused me also as I never had hardware that supports kvm. Reading your notes, if you do enable acceleration in virt-install (and does this also apply to launching it through virtual machine manager "new" virtual machine creation) and have kqemu built, just asking to confi

[Bug 342642] Re: [needs packaging] uCommon

2009-04-29 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress -- [needs packaging] uCommon https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342642 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com https:/

[Bug 361827] Re: Obsolete version with broken zrtp support

2009-04-29 Thread David Sugar
According to "published version", Karmic has (will have) correct versions of all related packages (see https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/libzrtpcpp and https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/twinkle). I guess I should set this as "in progress" for now, and once it appears, I should mar

[Bug 342642] [NEW] [needs packaging] GNU uCommon

2009-03-13 Thread David Sugar
of GNU Bayonne 3. URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/commoncpp License: GNU Lesser GPL v3 or later I already have a preliminary package successfully built for ucommon in my ppa, consisting of: libucommon2 libucommon-dev ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar

[Bug 342637] [NEW] [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch

2009-03-13 Thread David Sugar
-dev perl-sipwitch php5-sipwitch python-sipwitch sipwitch-plugin-forward sipwitch-plugin-rtpproxy sipwitch-plugin-scripting sipwitch-plugin-subscriber sipwitch-plugin-zeroconf sipwitch ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: New ** Tags

[Bug 350962] Re: [9.04 beta] no way to access screensaver enable/disable or timer settings like pre-beta 9.04

2009-04-03 Thread David Sugar
In Xubuntu 9.04 (beta), gnome-screensaver-preferences is still installed and can be manually executed, giving access to all the standard screen saver settings. The problem seems to be only that it is not offered in any menu anywhere. -- [9.04 beta] no way to access screensaver enable/disable or

[Bug 342637] Re: [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch

2009-04-15 Thread David Sugar
I will submit packages for "revu" after 9.04 is out... -- [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/342637 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubuntu.com ht

[Bug 361827] [NEW] Obsolete version with broken zrtp support

2009-04-15 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: twinkle Twinkle can be used to create fully media endpoint secure VoIP telephone calls using a GNU GPL implementation of Phil Zimmermanns ZRTP protocol. This package is used as a foundation for secure communication infrastructure in a number of institutio

[Bug 396759] [NEW] Required upstream update for zrtp ietf interop

2009-07-07 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: upstream 1.4.5 update is required to achieve full interoperability of ZRTP under the published IETF key-exchange protocol. This is related to Twinkle interoperability with zphone and SIP Communicator, the latter of which already was updated to GNU ZRTP 4J 1.4.5 some time ago.

[Bug 396759] Re: Required upstream update for zrtp ietf interop

2009-07-07 Thread David Sugar
** Attachment added: "debdiff from current 1.4.3 to new 1.4.5 upstream" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/28775918/libzrtpcpp-1.4.3-to-1.4.5.diff.gz -- Required upstream update for zrtp ietf interop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396759 You received this bug notification because you are a member

[Bug 396759] Re: Required upstream update for zrtp ietf interop

2009-07-07 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: libzrtpcpp (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- Required upstream update for zrtp ietf interop https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/396759 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubun

[Bug 396759] Re: Required upstream update for zrtp ietf interop

2009-07-08 Thread David Sugar
Ah...I see what you mean. I had attached a debdiff from 1.4.3 to my 1.4.5...but not the diff for my 1.4.5 itself... All I did was change the upstream version, added a changelog entry, and gave it a -0ubuntuX release number so that it could be trumped should Debian ever update their archive and a

[Bug 383978] Re: [ARM] wvdial seems unusable on armel due to reliance on the unimplemented sysv ucontext API in glibc

2009-07-08 Thread David Sugar
*** This bug is a duplicate of bug 383975 *** https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/383975 It is worth noting that this problem seems entirely confined to utils/wvtask.cc. One key difference to note about ucontext vs set/longjmp is that signal states are also saved in the context_t. I think this c

[Bug 354522] Re: espeak sound doesn't play correctly

2009-07-08 Thread David Sugar
In Jaunty we have: portaudio19-19+svn20071207 In Karmic we currently have: portaudio19_19+svn20090620 Offhand, I do not know if this finally fixes these specific issues, however. Also rebuilding the newer Karmic package on Jaunty may break abi's, depending on what is different in these svn snapsh

Re: [Bug 398403] [NEW] gcc-4.4 fails to build upstart 0.6 on armel due to an internal compiler error

2009-07-12 Thread David Sugar
Perhaps it was forced to swap or ran out of virtual memory. Sometimes you will find some strange situation in some piece of code where gcc seems to decide it needs a massive amount of memory and a very long time to compile something optimized. For example, there was a time when compiling the pci

[Bug 364656] Re: armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94

2009-08-05 Thread David Sugar
Does getconf CLK_TCK also report 94? There is a relevant debian bug for this; http://bugs.debian.org/cgi- bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=460331 which at least explains why this is reported as invalid. A common way to compute this is to sleep 1 second and count the difference in timer interrupt events. pr

[Bug 358362] Re: Usplash doesn't work on systems without vesa framebuffer

2009-08-05 Thread David Sugar
In debian/rules: ifeq ($(DEB_HOST_ARCH), $(findstring $(DEB_HOST_ARCH),i386 amd64 lpia)) BACKEND = "BACKEND=svga" else BACKEND = endif It looks like i386, amd64 and lpia all use the svgalib backend, and that does initialize svgalib only for VESA. svgalib can however also be set t

[Bug 364656] Re: armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94

2009-08-05 Thread David Sugar
Decided to patch procps for a relaxed tick range. ** Changed in: procps (Ubuntu) Status: New => In Progress -- armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ub

[Bug 364656] Re: armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94

2009-08-05 Thread David Sugar
There are reports of this happening native on i386 hw also. I extended the valid range from 95-105 to 90-105. This is not a great solution, because this really indicates the methodology presently used in procps is not sufficiently reliable, but it should be okay for those having this problem righ

[Bug 364656] Re: armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94

2009-08-05 Thread David Sugar
** Attachment removed: "procps_3.2.7-11ubuntu3.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29934156/procps_3.2.7-11ubuntu3.diff.gz -- armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subs

[Bug 364656] Re: armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94

2009-08-05 Thread David Sugar
** Attachment added: "procps_3.2.7-11ubuntu3.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29934773/procps_3.2.7-11ubuntu3.debdiff.gz -- armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is

[Bug 364656] Re: armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94

2009-08-05 Thread David Sugar
** Attachment added: "procps_3.2.7-11ubuntu3.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29934823/procps_3.2.7-11ubuntu3.diff.gz -- armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/364656 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subsc

[Bug 364656] Re: armel/versatile: unknown HZ value 94

2009-08-06 Thread David Sugar
This is a patch, for Karmic procps 3.2.8-1ubuntu1, that fixes the issue the way suggested at the end of the debian bug list, by assuring the linux version detection actually occurs before init_libproc, hence removing the hack calculation for modern kernels with elf notes. Originally, both init_Linu

[Bug 372121] Re: xargs on qemu has bad ARG_MAX

2009-08-07 Thread David Sugar
The default arg size used in xargs is further checked against the posix api reported limits. It is possible the upper limit is 128K on qemu/versatile/arm, but note that whatever value is selected is further validated against sysconf(_SC_ARG_MAX). However, as noted in sysconf itself, this does no

[Bug 372121] Re: xargs on qemu has bad ARG_MAX

2009-08-07 Thread David Sugar
Loic, we currently do both; we have a default maximum value hard coded, but we also check at runtime to make sure it is not larger than what sysconf would allow. -- xargs on qemu has bad ARG_MAX https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/372121 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 401453] [NEW] [needs packaging] GNU ccScript

2009-07-19 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: GNU ccScript is a realtime concurrent scripting engine and is used as a foundation for building GNU Bayonne. Currently the 4th edition of GNU ccScript, to be used to build GNU Bayonne 3.0, has not yet been packaged. URL: http://www.gnu.org/software/ccscript License: GNU Gene

[Bug 401453] Re: [needs packaging] GNU ccScript

2009-07-19 Thread David Sugar
** Attachment added: "ccscript_4.1.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29257068/ccscript_4.1.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress -- [needs packaging] GNU ccScript https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/401453 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 401453] Re: [needs packaging] GNU ccScript

2009-07-19 Thread David Sugar
** Attachment removed: "ccscript_4.1.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29257068/ccscript_4.1.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz ** Attachment added: "ccscript_4.1.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29257312/ccscript_4.1.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- [needs packaging] GNU ccScript h

[Bug 342637] Re: [needs packaging] GNU SIP Witch

2009-07-19 Thread David Sugar
** Attachment added: "sipwitch_0.5.6-0.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/29257364/sipwitch_0.5.6-0.diff.gz ** Description changed: GNU SIP Witch is a VoIP call/telephone/video server for the SIP protocol that is capable of supporting secure and direct peer-to-peer media endpoint in

[Bug 401453] Re: [needs packaging] GNU ccScript

2009-07-19 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) ** Description changed: GNU ccScript is a realtime concurrent scripting engine and is used as a foundation for building GNU Bayonne. Currently the 4th edition of GNU ccScript, to be used to build GNU Bayonne 3.0,

[Bug 391588] Re: banshee fails to run on arm

2009-07-20 Thread David Sugar
I appologize for not commenting earlier, I had been battling other hw issues that kept me from testing this properly. So far, I have not been able to get Banshee to come up far enough to even hit this failure point on my present hw, so I had started digging more into the code to understand why thi

Re: [Bug 398403] Re: gcc-4.4 fails to build upstart 0.6 on armel due to an internal compiler error

2009-07-13 Thread David Sugar
This is so very much like my strange experience last year with just a very specific file in X.org that would similarly balloon gcc memory usage cross-compiling for powerpc...the solution chosen at the time was to use 2G or larger build machines ;). Loïc Minier wrote: > 19:06 < lool> cjwatson: I bu

[Bug 416522] [NEW] atomics, threading, and missing __gnu_cxx::__exchange_and_add(int*, int)

2009-08-20 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: This is a place-holder for a curious issue I found myself investigating today, and it is probably related to some unimplemented arm specific functionality in libstdc++/gcc and referenced through ext/atomics.h. Basically, I encountered a "missing __gnu_cxx::__exchange_and_add(i

[Bug 403286] [NEW] mini-httpd sysv init script now requires bash

2009-07-22 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mini-httpd The sysv style init script packaged with mini-httpd was changed between Jaunty (1.19.8) and Karmic (1.19.9) to use "function". Hence, it no longer will run when /bin/sh = dash. This I believe is a regression. This may actually be a result of

[Bug 403286] Re: mini-httpd sysv init script now requires bash

2009-07-22 Thread David Sugar
** Tags added: packaging ** Tags removed: karmic -- mini-httpd sysv init script now requires bash https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/403286 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list ubuntu-bugs@lists.ubunt

[Bug 540419] Re: mgltools-opengltk requires python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-27 Thread David Sugar
It is not python version specific. This is the same for all three mgltools related packages. ** Changed in: mgltools-opengltk (Ubuntu) Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned) -- mgltools-opengltk requires python2.6 for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540419 You received t

[Bug 540415] Re: mgltools-pmv must depend on python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-27 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: mgltools-pmv (Ubuntu) Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned) -- mgltools-pmv must depend on python2.6 for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540415 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubu

[Bug 540422] Re: mgltools-mglutil requires python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-27 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: mgltools-mglutil (Ubuntu) Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned) -- mgltools-mglutil requires python2.6 for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540422 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubu

[Bug 540419] Re: mgltools-opengltk requires python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-27 Thread David Sugar
Isn't XS-Python-Version required for pycentral helper scripts though? -- mgltools-opengltk requires python2.6 for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540419 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-bugs mailing list u

[Bug 575082] [NEW] Please update for new ucommon abi for Maverick

2010-05-04 Thread David Sugar
. I am going to upload a debdiff and related files for updating Maverick shortly. I need this in because this will block other uploads for I have Maverick, but there is no urgent issue otherwise. ** Affects: ucommon (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet

[Bug 575082] Re: Please update for new ucommon abi for Maverick

2010-05-04 Thread David Sugar
primary package diff for 2.1.3 ** Patch added: "ucommon_2.1.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47791268/ucommon_2.1.3-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Please update for new ucommon abi for Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575082 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 575082] Re: Please update for new ucommon abi for Maverick

2010-05-04 Thread David Sugar
debdiff from ucommon 2.0.8 to 2.1.3 ** Patch added: "debdiff 2.0.8 to 2.1.3" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47791303/ucommon.debdiff -- Please update for new ucommon abi for Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu B

[Bug 576967] [NEW] new upstream version for Maverick

2010-05-07 Thread David Sugar
releases, so it seemed a good time to update Maverick's archive. ** Affects: sipwitch (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: New ** Changed in: sipwitch (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) -- new upstream version for

[Bug 575082] Re: Please update for new ucommon abi for Maverick

2010-05-07 Thread David Sugar
** Changed in: ucommon (Ubuntu) Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned) -- Please update for new ucommon abi for Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575082 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu-b

[Bug 576967] Re: new upstream version for Maverick

2010-05-07 Thread David Sugar
sipwitch diff for 0.8.1 package ** Patch added: "sipwitch_0.8.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47997405/sipwitch_0.8.1-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- new upstream version for Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576967 You received this bug notification because you are a member of

[Bug 576967] Re: new upstream version for Maverick

2010-05-07 Thread David Sugar
debdiff from 0.7.4 (lucid) to 0.8.1 (for maverick) ** Patch added: "sipwitch.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/47997423/sipwitch.debdiff ** Changed in: sipwitch (Ubuntu) Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) => (unassigned) -- new upstream version for Maverick https://bugs.

[Bug 506358] Re: [armel] unable to find a register to spill in class 'GENERAL_REGS'

2010-01-22 Thread David Sugar
This issue also effects building busybox. Will try the same using -O2 there. -- [armel] unable to find a register to spill in class 'GENERAL_REGS' https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/506358 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. --

[Bug 511197] [NEW] fails to build on arm lucid (thumb2)

2010-01-22 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: busybox There is a gcc issue, as reported in 506358, effecting builds of open office. This same gcc issue effects busybox. After some testing, the best solution seems to be to set armel builds to use -marm, since changing optimization flags are override

[Bug 511197] Re: fails to build on arm lucid (thumb2)

2010-01-22 Thread David Sugar
Patch attached ** Attachment added: "busybox.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/38237235/busybox.debdiff.gz ** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) ** Changed in: busybox (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- fails

Re: [Bug 449984] Re: Empathy SIP Issues - karmic beta

2010-01-19 Thread David Sugar
In respect to the error 401, there are two possible errors you can get. The normal one would be a "407 Proxy Authentication Required", at which point Empathy should (I think actually does) supply the authentication header with the next invite. The reason you are getting a 401 rather than a 407 fr

[Bug 513732] Re: [arm] needs porting to thumb2

2010-02-25 Thread David Sugar
I found a simpler way to patch this which leaves configure alone. The debdiff is attached. ** Attachment added: "gmp.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39787944/gmp.debdiff.gz -- [arm] needs porting to thumb2 https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/513732 You received this bug notification b

[Bug 513732] Re: [arm] needs porting to thumb2

2010-02-25 Thread David Sugar
Opps, forgot to add the actual bug to the changelog ;). Revised patch ** Attachment removed: "gmp.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39787944/gmp.debdiff.gz ** Attachment added: "gmp.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39788313/gmp.debdiff.gz -- [arm] needs porting to th

[Bug 420513] Re: [needs packaging] lubuntu desktop meta

2009-09-01 Thread David Sugar
This had to be in this morning, so I only had time to incorporate Martin-Éric Racine's changes to the meta and seed. The tarball has the source, dsc, and changes files needed to build. ** Attachment added: "lubuntu-meta-srcbld.tar.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/31123466/lubuntu-meta-srcbl

[Bug 129758] Re: [needs-packaging] pocketsphinx

2009-09-03 Thread David Sugar
At long last this is ready and for Karmic! ;) http://revu.ubuntuwire.com/p/pocketsphinx This requires a feature freeze exception for Karmic: * It is part of a UDS Karmic blueprint (https://blueprints.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+spec/ubuntu-mobile-voice-user- interface) * It fixes broken functionali

Re: [Lubuntu-desktop] [Bug 432664] Re: Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta

2009-09-21 Thread David Sugar
I am away in Portland for LinuxCon most of the week, but I had no further modifications. If I have a chance, I will try to do so later tonight or tomorrow, unless you wish to run update and upload the new version. Julien Lavergne wrote: > lxde-icon-theme is now in the archive, any modifications y

[Bug 432664] Re: Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta

2009-09-22 Thread David Sugar
debdiff for 0.5 release attached, Julian, if you would like to sponsor it... ** Attachment added: "lubuntu-meta_0.5.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/32263015/lubuntu-meta_0.5.debdiff.gz -- Minor Lubuntu meta package changes for Karmic beta https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/432664 You

[Bug 494667] Re: [armel] non-ISO-C misaligned pointer punning causes slowness and SIGILLs

2009-12-11 Thread David Sugar
This adds a conditional in the Makefile to use -marm when DEB_BUILD_ARCH_CPU is arm, which does for arm as suggested by David Martin. The lucid version of squashfs was still debian upstream. I am not sure if we wish to push this back to debian at all, or even if we later want to address this in a

[Bug 404876] Re: please update the package ucommon to 2.0.6

2009-12-07 Thread David Sugar
There is now a 2.0.7 upstream release, but this really was about pedantic cleanup for gcc 4.4 and the addition of a makefile target to clean docs, but has no real effective change from the perspective of packaging or use. But I am happy to see 2.0.6 did get packaged for Karmic. -- please update

Re: [Bug 553398] Re: [ftbfs] condor at least on armel

2010-04-12 Thread David Sugar
I had been told in the past not to do it as a patch if it does not already have a patch system in place and is originally from debian to simplify future merges, but I see this has an entirely Ubuntu history from the changelog. So yes, I should have done it adding a patch system and a patch for thi

[Bug 539206] [NEW] Two packaging issues; debug package and setuid for sippasswd

2010-03-15 Thread David Sugar
options from upstream Why FFE? This package is tied to a blueprint for Lucid and effects no other packages or subsystems. This update fixes existing functionality and packaging issues. ** Affects: sipwitch (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status

[Bug 539206] Re: Two packaging issues; debug package and setuid for sippasswd

2010-03-15 Thread David Sugar
debdiff for this change... ** Attachment added: "debdiff from 0.7.1 to 0.7.4" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40964492/sipwitch.debdiff.gz -- Two packaging issues; debug package and setuid for sippasswd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539206 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 539206] Re: Two packaging issues; debug package and setuid for sippasswd

2010-03-15 Thread David Sugar
Debian diff for new release... ** Patch added: "sipwitch_0.7.4-0ubuntu1.diff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/40964598/sipwitch_0.7.4-0ubuntu1.diff.gz -- Two packaging issues; debug package and setuid for sippasswd https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539206 You received this bug notification be

[Bug 539660] [NEW] [needs-packaging] lightmediascanner

2010-03-16 Thread David Sugar
ation, avoiding parsing files that are already up-to-date. This SQLite connection and the file id within the master table 'files' are handled to plugins for relationship with other tables. ** Affects: ubuntu Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: New

[Bug 539700] [NEW] ftbfs - missing dependency libdbusmenu-qt-dev

2010-03-16 Thread David Sugar
: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: plasma-widget-message-indicator (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Changed in: plasma-widget-message-indicator (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) -- ftbfs - missing depe

[Bug 539700] Re: ftbfs - missing dependency libdbusmenu-qt-dev

2010-03-16 Thread David Sugar
Added missing dependency (per attachment), builds fine now... ** Attachment added: "plasma-widget-message-indicator.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41035208/plasma-widget-message-indicator.debdiff -- ftbfs - missing dependency libdbusmenu-qt-dev https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/539700

[Bug 539874] [NEW] ftbfs for armel on lucid - gcc cannot build this optimized

2010-03-16 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: ziproxy This is an armel specific bug. Actually it is more a gcc/armel/thumb2 issue, as this triggers a gcc internal failure when compiled on lucid for thumb2. It builds fine if optimization is disabled, however, so I have modified the rules to disable

[Bug 539874] Re: ftbfs for armel on lucid - gcc cannot build this optimized

2010-03-16 Thread David Sugar
Temporary fix until gcc issues resolved... ** Changed in: ziproxy (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) ** Changed in: ziproxy (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed ** Attachment added: "ziproxy.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41056879

[Bug 540415] [NEW] mgltools-pmv must depend on python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-17 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mgltools-pmv This needed to be updated for python2.6 for Lucid ** Affects: mgltools-pmv (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: mgltools-pmv (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned

[Bug 540419] [NEW] mgltools-opengltk requires python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-17 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mgltools-opengltk Just requires dependency update ** Affects: mgltools-opengltk (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: mgltools-opengltk (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned

[Bug 540422] [NEW] mgltools-mglutil requires python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-17 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: mgltools-mglutil The python dependency needs to be updated for Lucid. ** Affects: mgltools-mglutil (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: mgltools-mglutil (Ubuntu) Assignee

[Bug 553398] [NEW] [ftbfs] condor at least on armel

2010-04-01 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: condor Currently fails to build from source. This is a result of changes in include file order and dependencies in glibc on lucid. I patched this to move where it includes and modifies ** Affects: condor (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided St

[Bug 553398] Re: [ftbfs] condor at least on armel

2010-04-01 Thread David Sugar
** Attachment added: "condor_7.2.4.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42796616/condor_7.2.4.debdiff ** Attachment removed: "condor_7.2.4.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42796616/condor_7.2.4.debdiff -- [ftbfs] condor at least on armel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553398 You

[Bug 553398] Re: [ftbfs] condor at least on armel

2010-04-01 Thread David Sugar
debdiff with lp error attached... ** Attachment added: "condor_7.2.4.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42797211/condor_7.2.4.debdiff -- [ftbfs] condor at least on armel https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/553398 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, whic

[Bug 540419] Re: mgltools-opengltk requires python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-31 Thread David Sugar
New debdiff for this issue attached ** Attachment removed: "opengltk_1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1 to 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1ubuntu1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41161479/mgltools-opengltk.debdiff ** Attachment added: "mgltools-opengltk.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42650798/mgltools-opengl

[Bug 540422] Re: mgltools-mglutil requires python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-31 Thread David Sugar
new debdiff for this issue ** Attachment removed: "1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1 to 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1ubuntu1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41155702/mgltools-mglutil.debdiff ** Attachment added: "mgltools-mglutil.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42651097/mgltools-mglutil.debdiff ** Change

[Bug 540415] Re: mgltools-pmv must depend on python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-31 Thread David Sugar
new debdiff for this issue ** Attachment removed: "1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1 to 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1ubuntu1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41159441/mgltools-pmv.debdiff ** Attachment added: "mgltools-pmv.debdiff" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/42651445/mgltools-pmv.debdiff ** Changed in: mgltoo

[Bug 519897] Re: [armel] squid FTBFS: cf_gen Segmentation fault

2010-03-12 Thread David Sugar
Building squid still crashes with current gcc on armel, and I do not have the root cause yet. Although I do not know if we want to do this, I did a small change for debian/rules to build with -O0 for arm, and this at least does work, as Loic noted much earlier. So I have attached it here. ** At

[Bug 532554] Re: [needs-packaging] [FFe] canola for lucid/universe

2010-03-12 Thread David Sugar
This is what I think is "minimally" needed to get Canola2 going: etk efl-epsilon lightmediascanner python-evas (debian merge, updated) python-ecore(debian sid, updated) python-etk python-edbus(debian sid, merge?) python-edje (debian sid, merge?) python-efl-epsilon python-efl-utils

[Bug 576967] Re: new upstream version for Maverick

2010-05-17 Thread David Sugar
I like this very much, and in fact I will have to look at how I am packaging other things now as well. I will take this in with maybe a few small tweaks, and propagate something similar to things like ucommon and ccscript packaging. Actually there will be a newer upstream release of sipwitch (0.8

[Bug 575082] Re: Please update for new ucommon abi for Maverick

2010-05-19 Thread David Sugar
Fabrice, a new version of sipwitch was pending in another que. I am going to post an update for that shortly, and that should be in maverick also shortly. -- Please update for new ucommon abi for Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/575082 You received this bug notification because you are a

[Bug 576967] Re: new upstream version for Maverick

2010-05-19 Thread David Sugar
Debdiff for new 0.8.3 release with proposed changes merged ** Attachment added: "debdiff from 0.7.4 to 0.8.3" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48722268/sipwitch.debdiff.gz -- new upstream version for Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576967 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 576967] Re: new upstream version for Maverick

2010-05-19 Thread David Sugar
Packaging for 0.8.3 by itself ** Attachment added: "sipwitch_0.8.3-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48722359/sipwitch_0.8.3-0ubuntu1.debian.tar.gz -- new upstream version for Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576967 You received this bug notification because you a

[Bug 576967] Re: new upstream version for Maverick

2010-05-19 Thread David Sugar
Benjamin, I have merged your changes with upstream changes for the newer 0.8.3 release, which includes placing network config change scripts, and re-subscribing sponsors as you suggest. -- new upstream version for Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576967 You received this bug notification

[Bug 583841] [NEW] armv7 requirement for 10.04 or later

2010-05-21 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: update-manager When upgrading on arm, we now require arm v7 or later for 10.04 (and 10.10). This is because we are now using thumb2 instruction mode. A simple patch to DistUpgradeQuirks.py is needed for this, and I will attach one to be pushed back into

[Bug 583841] Re: armv7 requirement for 10.04 or later

2010-05-21 Thread David Sugar
** Patch added: "0.134.8 to 0.134.9" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/48871526/update-manager.diff -- armv7 requirement for 10.04 or later https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/583841 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which is subscribed to Ubuntu. -- ubuntu

[Bug 591412] [NEW] btrfs-tools fails to build, missing header

2010-06-08 Thread David Sugar
Public bug reported: Binary package hint: btrfs-tools btrfsck.c fails to compile, missing , probably was included indirectly in older glibc's. This is a simple patch to clear the package build status for Maverick. ** Affects: btrfs-tools (Ubuntu) Importance: Undecided Status: New

[Bug 591412] Re: btrfs-tools fails to build, missing header

2010-06-08 Thread David Sugar
Patch attached, probably should get pushed upstream. ** Attachment added: "btrfs-tools.debdiff.gz" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49965271/btrfs-tools.debdiff.gz -- btrfs-tools fails to build, missing header https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/591412 You received this bug notification because you

[Bug 576967] Re: new upstream version for Maverick

2010-05-25 Thread David Sugar
sippasswd needs to be a setuid binary. I added $remote_fs to init as suggested, as yes, it makes sense since /usr may be network mounted, and I fixed sipwitch-cgi. I do not think the abi is stable enough where it can be trusted to match linkage between even different point releases, and at the mo

[Bug 576967] Re: new upstream version for Maverick

2010-05-25 Thread David Sugar
Revised debdiff ** Attachment added: "debdiff from 0.7.4 to 0.8.3 - revised" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/49070331/sipwitch.debdiff.gz -- new upstream version for Maverick https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/576967 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu Bugs, which

[Bug 532554] Re: [FFe] canola for lucid/universe

2010-03-05 Thread David Sugar
u1.diff.gz ** Changed in: ubuntu Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) ** Changed in: ubuntu Status: New => In Progress -- [FFe] canola for lucid/universe https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/532554 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubunt

[Bug 499632] Re: [i965gm] screen flickers whenever anything is drawn under KMS

2010-03-24 Thread David Sugar
I have found this same or a very similar issue on a dell 1545 with intel video, and with beta1, and updated to current (3/24). I tried the suggested fix, adding i915.modeset=0 and using UMS. While it kinda killed the splash screen, I discovered that a lot of the times I was getting these mystery

[Bug 540422] Re: mgltools-mglutil requires python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-17 Thread David Sugar
debdiff to fix python packaging issues for lucid ** Attachment added: "1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1 to 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1ubuntu1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41155702/mgltools-mglutil.debdiff -- mgltools-mglutil requires python2.6 for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540422 You received thi

[Bug 540415] Re: mgltools-pmv must depend on python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-17 Thread David Sugar
Debdiff for fixed python version ** Attachment added: "1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1 to 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1ubuntu1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41159441/mgltools-pmv.debdiff -- mgltools-pmv must depend on python2.6 for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540415 You received this bug notification

[Bug 540419] Re: mgltools-opengltk requires python2.6 for lucid

2010-03-17 Thread David Sugar
Debdiff to update python support for Lucid ** Attachment added: "opengltk_1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1 to 1.5.4.cvs.20090603-1ubuntu1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/41161479/mgltools-opengltk.debdiff -- mgltools-opengltk requires python2.6 for lucid https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/540419 You receive

[Bug 520996] [NEW] broken init script in sipwitch package

2010-02-12 Thread David Sugar
Assignee: David Sugar (dyfet) Status: Confirmed ** Changed in: sipwitch (Ubuntu) Assignee: (unassigned) => David Sugar (dyfet) ** Changed in: sipwitch (Ubuntu) Status: New => Confirmed -- broken init script in sipwitch package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520996 You re

[Bug 520996] Re: broken init script in sipwitch package

2010-02-12 Thread David Sugar
Debdiff from 0.6.2 to 1.7.1 attached ** Patch added: "debdiff 0.6.2 to 0.7.1" http://launchpadlibrarian.net/39100788/sipwitch-0.7.1.debdiff.gz -- broken init script in sipwitch package https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/520996 You received this bug notification because you are a member of Ubuntu

  1   2   3   4   >